Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261809AbTH2TEt (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Aug 2003 15:04:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261828AbTH2TEs (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Aug 2003 15:04:48 -0400 Received: from e3.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.103]:41909 "EHLO e3.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261809AbTH2TEr (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Aug 2003 15:04:47 -0400 Subject: Re: /proc/ioports overrun patch From: john stultz To: Marcelo Tosatti Cc: olof@austin.ibm.com, lkml , "Randy.Dunlap" In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1062183578.1307.1400.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.4 Date: 29 Aug 2003 11:59:39 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 744 Lines: 22 On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 06:30, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > If so, I would prefer to have a fix which outputs the full resource > information. For that we would need seq_file(). I have a patch that converts /proc/interrupts to use seq_file as well, however it would be much cleaner if Randy's backport of the "single" interface went in first http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0308.3/0296.html Are you planning on taking that patch? Or should I just resend my patch w/o it? thanks -john - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/