Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 16 May 2018 12:43:13 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc:     Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
        Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
        the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT] [PATCH 03/10] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Utility functions
 to boost HWP performance limits
Message-ID: <20180516104313.GC12217@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <20180516044911.28797-1-srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
 <20180516044911.28797-4-srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
 <20180516072202.GV12217@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <CAJZ5v0iaRFO5GWRZAHVWWVMmF8FQps1CowpE5r6zj_tFO7W+jg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0iaRFO5GWRZAHVWWVMmF8FQps1CowpE5r6zj_tFO7W+jg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.5 (2018-04-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 11:15:09AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> So if the "cached" thing is the last "not boosted EPP", that's why it
> is not updated here.

Sure, I see what it does, just saying that naming and comments are wrong
vs the actual code.