Received: by 2002:ac0:a594:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m20-v6csp1964640imm; Wed, 16 May 2018 05:57:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZp6n+VzcL4thcUESEnbGJTdAsFZATsba/TOqGZ4krrJLPn2gzNusA33kwD90npZ558VbhMi X-Received: by 2002:a62:a65c:: with SMTP id t89-v6mr865206pfe.27.1526475458859; Wed, 16 May 2018 05:57:38 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1526475458; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=i+IzmgsvcGIFmL6/xqu/OYCEnnT/6uicVlt1AFEAMQ8JsnptqNbJPRqtfD3a9Isi4R 9caHSkR29eHjPs/+2BDuiHqAhGXumhCeThBrxWOIV2DlCC8pKUH7muFSc+0kRx1G2+0M zRNoPwCyR+MJVsz364dN8keDtzSm/BdYve/sj+JI/N0aDiUwgQfaTRxVSYxPso0DLCGO fvvYRHT3h2lhwFyBZGQxTpqLVDNl6oGu+luQIiZ/yqUMJCasPKQXfNW1qYBQ4tv2Y4vw VM30Ve2j5ohFZFD/1ydcx+JaIkMKJ73Kbe9Pmum04q2U8ENWGTzo6lxx+bhK4PKDznUt a3Iw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-language :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :from:references:cc:to:subject:arc-authentication-results; bh=QmQowtWI63KAZti9YKADfPiaG6uuYJW4mTx4meCIJDw=; b=GpJk3B47uhsCXD6DzmxmRHA3kXYKe2jDfq4nM2zIyGP9Rly5y45XyWQQSO1mI5gQ+d yL7dPNCZLYgXe6L94TpoUqxhiWprobn6Hun45O8FPjz9ADZCdWirmQCJoMTJjj4m5MKs P9tvDNZNQO1QUHS3dB85MgrmyCLTPHivm7s9gP6ro3ZRhob+v2HCl/80Kx3lWLIo5ryQ uzqCnowBEto2Vj/I1xoh+gh+we1SuDLNOqxnqF20yHeTntl+nGH5J0EjEXVZ8H/CzPo7 qAutDTRYVOo+iGY8v6HkDV9PRKjq4Pddkt0f1BnLVQ//zBGSLDO8GadHpjwtkyyI3ekJ 8M3g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t3-v6si2437646plo.554.2018.05.16.05.57.24; Wed, 16 May 2018 05:57:38 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752679AbeEPMuj (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 16 May 2018 08:50:39 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:38830 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752563AbeEPMuh (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 May 2018 08:50:37 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098421.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w4GCoJTX006300 for ; Wed, 16 May 2018 08:50:37 -0400 Received: from e32.co.us.ibm.com (e32.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.150]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2j0kc4chx6-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 16 May 2018 08:50:20 -0400 Received: from localhost by e32.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 16 May 2018 06:49:06 -0600 Received: from b03cxnp08025.gho.boulder.ibm.com (9.17.130.17) by e32.co.us.ibm.com (192.168.1.132) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Wed, 16 May 2018 06:49:02 -0600 Received: from b03ledav002.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03ledav002.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.233]) by b03cxnp08025.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w4GCn0Ep22610410; Wed, 16 May 2018 05:49:00 -0700 Received: from b03ledav002.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id B91C2136043; Wed, 16 May 2018 06:49:00 -0600 (MDT) Received: from oc8043147753.ibm.com (unknown [9.80.200.126]) by b03ledav002.gho.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB423136040; Wed, 16 May 2018 06:48:57 -0600 (MDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 05/13] s390: vfio-ap: register matrix device with VFIO mdev framework To: Cornelia Huck Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, freude@de.ibm.com, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, kwankhede@nvidia.com, bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com, pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com, alifm@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mjrosato@linux.vnet.ibm.com, jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com, thuth@redhat.com, pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com, berrange@redhat.com, fiuczy@linux.vnet.ibm.com, buendgen@de.ibm.com References: <1525705912-12815-1-git-send-email-akrowiak@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1525705912-12815-6-git-send-email-akrowiak@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20180516124240.42dcd426.cohuck@redhat.com> From: Tony Krowiak Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 08:48:57 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180516124240.42dcd426.cohuck@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18051612-0004-0000-0000-00001418A617 X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00009034; HX=3.00000241; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000260; SDB=6.01033129; UDB=6.00528230; IPR=6.00812260; MB=3.00021144; MTD=3.00000008; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2018-05-16 12:49:04 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18051612-0005-0000-0000-000087360798 Message-Id: X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2018-05-16_05:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1709140000 definitions=main-1805160131 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05/16/2018 06:42 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Mon, 7 May 2018 11:11:44 -0400 > Tony Krowiak wrote: > >> Registers the matrix device created by the VFIO AP device >> driver with the VFIO mediated device framework. >> Registering the matrix device will create the sysfs >> structures needed to create mediated matrix devices >> each of which will be used to configure the AP matrix >> for a guest and connect it to the VFIO AP device driver. >> >> Registering the matrix device with the VFIO mediated device >> framework will create the following sysfs structures: >> >> /sys/devices/vfio_ap >> ... [matrix] >> ...... [mdev_supported_types] >> ......... [vfio_ap-passthrough] >> ............ create >> >> To create a mediated device for the AP matrix device, write a UUID >> to the create file: >> >> uuidgen > create >> >> A symbolic link to the mediated device's directory will be created in the >> devices subdirectory named after the generated $uuid: >> >> /sys/devices/vfio_ap >> ... [matrix] >> ...... [mdev_supported_types] >> ......... [vfio_ap-passthrough] >> ............ [devices] >> ............... [$uuid] >> >> Signed-off-by: Tony Krowiak >> --- >> MAINTAINERS | 1 + >> drivers/s390/crypto/Makefile | 2 +- >> drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_drv.c | 9 +++ >> drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c | 106 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h | 17 +++++ >> 5 files changed, 134 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >> create mode 100644 drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c > >> diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000..d7d36fb >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c >> @@ -0,0 +1,106 @@ >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ >> +/* >> + * Adjunct processor matrix VFIO device driver callbacks. >> + * >> + * Copyright IBM Corp. 2017 > Should be '2018' (also in some other files in this series; please > double check.) Gee, I thought I got all of these fixed. I must have a gremlin in my laptop. > >> + * Author(s): Tony Krowiak >> + * >> + */ >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> + >> +#include "vfio_ap_private.h" >> + >> +#define VFOP_AP_MDEV_TYPE_HWVIRT "passthrough" >> +#define VFIO_AP_MDEV_NAME_HWVIRT "VFIO AP Passthrough Device" >> + >> +static int vfio_ap_mdev_create(struct kobject *kobj, struct mdev_device *mdev) >> +{ >> + struct ap_matrix *ap_matrix = to_ap_matrix(mdev_parent_dev(mdev)); >> + >> + ap_matrix->available_instances--; > Shouldn't the code check whether available_instances is actually > 0? It is my understanding that once the available_instances hits zero, the mdev framework will not allow any more mediated devices to be created, so the value should always be greater than zero when this function is invoked. I did an experiment to verify my understanding. I initialized the available_instances to 1. I was able to create 2 mediated devices. It seems that the framework refuses to create a mediated device only after the available_instances sysfs attribute is a negative number, so I have two choices: Initialize available_instances to one less than desires; add the check you suggested. I think I'll go with the latter. > >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +static int vfio_ap_mdev_remove(struct mdev_device *mdev) >> +{ >> + struct ap_matrix *ap_matrix = to_ap_matrix(mdev_parent_dev(mdev)); >> + >> + ap_matrix->available_instances++; >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +static ssize_t name_show(struct kobject *kobj, struct device *dev, char *buf) >> +{ >> + return sprintf(buf, "%s\n", VFIO_AP_MDEV_NAME_HWVIRT); >> +} >> + >> +MDEV_TYPE_ATTR_RO(name); >> + >> +static ssize_t available_instances_show(struct kobject *kobj, >> + struct device *dev, char *buf) >> +{ >> + struct ap_matrix *ap_matrix; >> + >> + ap_matrix = to_ap_matrix(dev); > Move this with the declaration? > >> + >> + return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", ap_matrix->available_instances); >> +} >> + >> +MDEV_TYPE_ATTR_RO(available_instances); >> + >> +static ssize_t device_api_show(struct kobject *kobj, struct device *dev, >> + char *buf) >> +{ >> + return sprintf(buf, "%s\n", VFIO_DEVICE_API_AP_STRING); >> +} >> + >> +MDEV_TYPE_ATTR_RO(device_api); >> + >> +static struct attribute *vfio_ap_mdev_type_attrs[] = { >> + &mdev_type_attr_name.attr, >> + &mdev_type_attr_device_api.attr, >> + &mdev_type_attr_available_instances.attr, >> + NULL, >> +}; >> + >> +static struct attribute_group vfio_ap_mdev_hwvirt_type_group = { >> + .name = VFOP_AP_MDEV_TYPE_HWVIRT, >> + .attrs = vfio_ap_mdev_type_attrs, >> +}; >> + >> +static struct attribute_group *vfio_ap_mdev_type_groups[] = { >> + &vfio_ap_mdev_hwvirt_type_group, >> + NULL, >> +}; >> + >> +static const struct mdev_parent_ops vfio_ap_matrix_ops = { >> + .owner = THIS_MODULE, >> + .supported_type_groups = vfio_ap_mdev_type_groups, >> + .create = vfio_ap_mdev_create, >> + .remove = vfio_ap_mdev_remove, >> +}; >> + >> +int vfio_ap_mdev_register(struct ap_matrix *ap_matrix) >> +{ >> + int ret; >> + >> + ret = mdev_register_device(&ap_matrix->device, &vfio_ap_matrix_ops); >> + if (ret) >> + return ret; >> + >> + ap_matrix->available_instances = AP_MATRIX_MAX_AVAILABLE_INSTANCES; >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +void vfio_ap_mdev_unregister(struct ap_matrix *ap_matrix) >> +{ >> + ap_matrix->available_instances--; >> + mdev_unregister_device(&ap_matrix->device); >> +} >> diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h >> index cf23675..afd8dbc 100644 >> --- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h >> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h >> @@ -10,14 +10,31 @@ >> #define _VFIO_AP_PRIVATE_H_ >> >> #include >> +#include >> +#include >> >> #include "ap_bus.h" >> >> #define VFIO_AP_MODULE_NAME "vfio_ap" >> #define VFIO_AP_DRV_NAME "vfio_ap" >> +/** >> + * There must be one mediated matrix device per guest. If every APQN is assigned > One, or at most one? Or one for every guest using ap devices? > >> + * to a guest, then the maximum number of guests with a unique APQN assigned >> + * would be 255 adapters x 255 domains = 72351 guests. >> + */ >> +#define AP_MATRIX_MAX_AVAILABLE_INSTANCES 72351 >> >> struct ap_matrix { >> struct device device; >> + int available_instances; >> }; >> >> +static inline struct ap_matrix *to_ap_matrix(struct device *dev) >> +{ >> + return container_of(dev, struct ap_matrix, device); >> +} >> + >> +extern int vfio_ap_mdev_register(struct ap_matrix *ap_matrix); >> +extern void vfio_ap_mdev_unregister(struct ap_matrix *ap_matrix); >> + >> #endif /* _VFIO_AP_PRIVATE_H_ */