Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 16 May 2018 08:09:05 -0500
From:   Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To:     poza@codeaurora.org
Cc:     Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
        Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>,
        linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Dongdong Liu <liudongdong3@huawei.com>,
        Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>, Wei Zhang <wzhang@fb.com>,
        Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>,
        Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 8/9] PCI/DPC: Unify and plumb error handling into DPC
Message-ID: <20180516130905.GA236884@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>
References: <1526035408-31328-1-git-send-email-poza@codeaurora.org>
 <1526035408-31328-9-git-send-email-poza@codeaurora.org>
 <a497fae20a326bdf67395c907a5b6b0d@codeaurora.org>
 <20180515235632.GB11156@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>
 <2ca65f6b38668cfcf553833409ee38e3@codeaurora.org>
 <20180516105236.GA217390@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>
 <d49a07cc1d255e894fb52f0b76bae772@codeaurora.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <d49a07cc1d255e894fb52f0b76bae772@codeaurora.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 06:21:09PM +0530, poza@codeaurora.org wrote:
> On 2018-05-16 16:22, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 01:46:25PM +0530, poza@codeaurora.org wrote:
> > > On 2018-05-16 05:26, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > > On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 05:22:08PM +0530, poza@codeaurora.org wrote:
> > > > > On 2018-05-11 16:13, Oza Pawandeep wrote:
> > > > > > DPC driver implements link_reset callback, and calls
> > > > > > pci_do_fatal_recovery().
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Which follows standard path of ERR_FATAL recovery.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Oza Pawandeep <poza@codeaurora.org>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.h b/drivers/pci/pci.h
> > > > > > index 5e8857a..6af7595 100644
> > > > > > --- a/drivers/pci/pci.h
> > > > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.h
> > > > > > @@ -354,7 +354,7 @@ static inline resource_size_t
> > > > > > pci_resource_alignment(struct pci_dev *dev,
> > > > > >  void pci_enable_acs(struct pci_dev *dev);
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  /* PCI error reporting and recovery */
> > > > > > -void pcie_do_fatal_recovery(struct pci_dev *dev);
> > > > > > +void pcie_do_fatal_recovery(struct pci_dev *dev, u32 service);
> > > > > >  void pcie_do_nonfatal_recovery(struct pci_dev *dev);
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  bool pcie_wait_for_link(struct pci_dev *pdev, bool active);
> > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv_core.c
> > > > > > b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv_core.c
> > > > > > index fdfc474..36e622d 100644
> > > > > > --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv_core.c
> > > > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv_core.c
> > > > > > @@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ static void handle_error_source(struct pcie_device
> > > > > > *aerdev,
> > > > > >  	} else if (info->severity == AER_NONFATAL)
> > > > > >  		pcie_do_nonfatal_recovery(dev);
> > > > > >  	else if (info->severity == AER_FATAL)
> > > > > > -		pcie_do_fatal_recovery(dev);
> > > > > > +		pcie_do_fatal_recovery(dev, PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_AER);
> > > > > >  }
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_PCIEAER
> > > > > > @@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ static void aer_recover_work_func(struct work_struct
> > > > > > *work)
> > > > > >  		if (entry.severity == AER_NONFATAL)
> > > > > >  			pcie_do_nonfatal_recovery(pdev);
> > > > > >  		else if (entry.severity == AER_FATAL)
> > > > > > -			pcie_do_fatal_recovery(pdev);
> > > > > > +			pcie_do_fatal_recovery(pdev, PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_AER);
> > > > > >  		pci_dev_put(pdev);
> > > > > >  	}
> > > > > >  }
> > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c
> > > > > > index 80ec384..5680c13 100644
> > > > > > --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c
> > > > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c
> > > > > > @@ -73,29 +73,31 @@ static void dpc_wait_link_inactive(struct dpc_dev
> > > > > > *dpc)
> > > > > >  	pcie_wait_for_link(pdev, false);
> > > > > >  }
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -static void dpc_work(struct work_struct *work)
> > > > > > +static pci_ers_result_t dpc_reset_link(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > > > > >  {
> > > > > > -	struct dpc_dev *dpc = container_of(work, struct dpc_dev, work);
> > > > > > -	struct pci_dev *dev, *temp, *pdev = dpc->dev->port;
> > > > > > -	struct pci_bus *parent = pdev->subordinate;
> > > > > > -	u16 cap = dpc->cap_pos, ctl;
> > > > > > -
> > > > > > -	pci_lock_rescan_remove();
> > > > > > -	list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(dev, temp, &parent->devices,
> > > > > > -					 bus_list) {
> > > > > > -		pci_dev_get(dev);
> > > > > > -		pci_dev_set_disconnected(dev, NULL);
> > > > > > -		if (pci_has_subordinate(dev))
> > > > > > -			pci_walk_bus(dev->subordinate,
> > > > > > -				     pci_dev_set_disconnected, NULL);
> > > > > > -		pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device(dev);
> > > > > > -		pci_dev_put(dev);
> > > > > > -	}
> > > > > > -	pci_unlock_rescan_remove();
> > > > > > -
> > > > > > +	struct dpc_dev *dpc;
> > > > > > +	struct pcie_device *pciedev;
> > > > > > +	struct device *devdpc;
> > > > > > +	u16 cap, ctl;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +	/*
> > > > > > +	 * DPC disables the Link automatically in hardware, so it has
> > > > > > +	 * already been reset by the time we get here.
> > > > > > +	 */
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +	devdpc = pcie_port_find_device(pdev, PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_DPC);
> > > > > > +	pciedev = to_pcie_device(devdpc);
> > > > > > +	dpc = get_service_data(pciedev);
> > > > > > +	cap = dpc->cap_pos;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +	/*
> > > > > > +	 * Waiting until the link is inactive, then clearing DPC
> > > > > > +	 * trigger status to allow the port to leave DPC.
> > > > > > +	 */
> > > > > >  	dpc_wait_link_inactive(dpc);
> > > > > > +
> > > > > >  	if (dpc->rp_extensions && dpc_wait_rp_inactive(dpc))
> > > > > > -		return;
> > > > > > +		return PCI_ERS_RESULT_DISCONNECT;
> > > > > >  	if (dpc->rp_extensions && dpc->rp_pio_status) {
> > > > > >  		pci_write_config_dword(pdev, cap + PCI_EXP_DPC_RP_PIO_STATUS,
> > > > > >  				       dpc->rp_pio_status);
> > > > > > @@ -108,6 +110,17 @@ static void dpc_work(struct work_struct *work)
> > > > > >  	pci_read_config_word(pdev, cap + PCI_EXP_DPC_CTL, &ctl);
> > > > > >  	pci_write_config_word(pdev, cap + PCI_EXP_DPC_CTL,
> > > > > >  			      ctl | PCI_EXP_DPC_CTL_INT_EN);
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +	return PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED;
> > > > > > +}
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +static void dpc_work(struct work_struct *work)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > +	struct dpc_dev *dpc = container_of(work, struct dpc_dev, work);
> > > > > > +	struct pci_dev *pdev = dpc->dev->port;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +	/* From DPC point of view error is always FATAL. */
> > > > > > +	pcie_do_fatal_recovery(pdev, PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_DPC);
> > > > > >  }
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  static void dpc_process_rp_pio_error(struct dpc_dev *dpc)
> > > > > > @@ -288,6 +301,7 @@ static struct pcie_port_service_driver dpcdriver = {
> > > > > >  	.service	= PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_DPC,
> > > > > >  	.probe		= dpc_probe,
> > > > > >  	.remove		= dpc_remove,
> > > > > > +	.reset_link	= dpc_reset_link,
> > > > > >  };
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  static int __init dpc_service_init(void)
> > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c
> > > > > > index 33a16b1..29ff148 100644
> > > > > > --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c
> > > > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c
> > > > > > @@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ static pci_ers_result_t default_reset_link(struct
> > > > > > pci_dev *dev)
> > > > > >  	return PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED;
> > > > > >  }
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -static pci_ers_result_t reset_link(struct pci_dev *dev)
> > > > > > +static pci_ers_result_t reset_link(struct pci_dev *dev, u32 service)
> > > > > >  {
> > > > > >  	struct pci_dev *udev;
> > > > > >  	pci_ers_result_t status;
> > > > > > @@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ static pci_ers_result_t reset_link(struct pci_dev
> > > > > > *dev)
> > > > > >  	}
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  	/* Use the aer driver of the component firstly */
> > > > > > -	driver = pcie_port_find_service(udev, PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_AER);
> > > > > > +	driver = pcie_port_find_service(udev, service);
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  	if (driver && driver->reset_link) {
> > > > > >  		status = driver->reset_link(udev);
> > > > > > @@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ static pci_ers_result_t
> > > > > > broadcast_error_message(struct pci_dev *dev,
> > > > > >   * followed by re-enumeration of devices.
> > > > > >   */
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -void pcie_do_fatal_recovery(struct pci_dev *dev)
> > > > > > +void pcie_do_fatal_recovery(struct pci_dev *dev, u32 service)
> > > > > >  {
> > > > > >  	struct pci_dev *udev;
> > > > > >  	struct pci_bus *parent;
> > > > > > @@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ void pcie_do_fatal_recovery(struct pci_dev *dev)
> > > > > >  		pci_dev_put(pdev);
> > > > > >  	}
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -	result = reset_link(udev);
> > > > > > +	result = reset_link(udev, service);
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  	if (dev->hdr_type == PCI_HEADER_TYPE_BRIDGE) {
> > > > > >  		/*
> > > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/aer.h b/include/linux/aer.h
> > > > > > index 8f87bbe..0c506fe 100644
> > > > > > --- a/include/linux/aer.h
> > > > > > +++ b/include/linux/aer.h
> > > > > > @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> > > > > >  #define AER_NONFATAL			0
> > > > > >  #define AER_FATAL			1
> > > > > >  #define AER_CORRECTABLE			2
> > > > > > +#define DPC_FATAL			4
> > > >
> > > > I think DPC_FATAL can be 3, since these values are not used as a bit
> > > > mask.
> > > >
> > > > > >  struct pci_dev;
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Bjorn,
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I have addressed all the comments, and I hope we are heading towards
> > > > > closure.
> > > > >
> > > > > I just figure that pcie_do_fatal_recovery  (which is getting
> > > > > executed for
> > > > > DPC as well)
> > > > >
> > > > > if (result == PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED) {
> > > > >                 if (pcie_wait_for_link(udev, true))
> > > > >                         pci_rescan_bus(udev->bus);
> > > > >                 pci_info(dev, "Device recovery successful\n");
> > > > >         }
> > > > >
> > > > > I have to correct it to
> > > > >
> > > > > if (service==AER  && result == PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED) {
> > > > >                 if (pcie_wait_for_link(udev, true))
> > > > >                         pci_rescan_bus(udev->bus);
> > > > >                 pci_info(dev, "Device recovery successful\n");
> > > > >         }
> > > >
> > > > This patch is mostly a restructuring of DPC and doesn't really change
> > > > its
> > > > behavior.  DPC didn't previously call pcie_wait_for_link() or
> > > > pci_rescan_bus(), so I agree that adding the "service==AER" test will
> > > > help preserve the existing DPC behavior.
> > > >
> > > > However, the rescan should happen with DPC *somewhere* and we should
> > > > clarify where that is.  Maybe for now we only need a comment about where
> > > > that happens.  Ideally, we could eventually converge this so the same
> > > > mechanism is used for AER and DPC, so we wouldn't need a test like
> > > > "service=AER".
> > 
> > Please still add a comment here about why the rescan behavior is
> > different.
> 
> I am not sure if I understand this comment. AER and DPC will follow the same
> path.
> if (result == PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED) {
>               if (pcie_wait_for_link(udev, true))
>                         pci_rescan_bus(udev->bus);
>                  pci_info(dev, "Device recovery successful\n");
>         }
> 
> so the above code will execute for both AER and DPC.
> and before re-enumerating both will wait for link to become active.

OK, good.  I still had your comment about adding the "service==AER"
test here in my mind.  You had already corrected that by saying you
intended that test for a different path, but I hadn't internalized it
yet.

If AER and DPC work the same here, that's great.  That's what we want,
so no clarifying comment should be needed.