Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262062AbTH2UIA (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Aug 2003 16:08:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261933AbTH2UHv (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Aug 2003 16:07:51 -0400 Received: from smtp-out2.iol.cz ([194.228.2.87]:14015 "EHLO smtp-out2.iol.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262005AbTH2UGQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Aug 2003 16:06:16 -0400 Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 23:19:05 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Patrick Mochel , kernel list Subject: [PM] /proc/acpi/sleep needs to stay Message-ID: <20030828211905.GA380@elf.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 840 Lines: 21 Hi! acpi/sleep needs to stay. It is published interface, being used in 2.4.X and 2.6.0-test3. That makes it wrong to change it in 2.6.0-test4. [I've seen two different people trying to use /proc/acpi/sleep in last week, *in person*.] Also your new /sys/power/state is bogus. You invented new abstraction, alas that abstraction is harmfull. User needs to know if he is doing S4BIOS or swsusp: in first case he needs to set up special partition, in second case he needs to pass resume= flag. Pavel -- When do you have a heart between your knees? [Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/