Received: by 2002:ac0:a594:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m20-v6csp2161995imm; Wed, 16 May 2018 08:48:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZp+YxO3A4Z2W1S++X+TV5x68+l/RuTkzvTS/HxnUHl86rzvEIZx2bGK8qYSAPOwNh8iB64f X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:aa95:: with SMTP id d21-v6mr1429598plr.73.1526485681080; Wed, 16 May 2018 08:48:01 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1526485681; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=A53p/if3ikV4VJLMRfc/N0HeCVPi3lGZCZBske0LTUhmSaciZVl1nSJ8RsR5jMH1JJ DCR3dHoMotzR/dEz68UelvJ6S9BBjyUeZqnZrPmNaDAi6Pk/rd99+fjK5NLqooRIXTKi TMdmoMNoyfLGZLhLKbfRQi1XLc81eoQVpmM+VJeGWYH5kRJzvTIMSDCSyDXmYcUu1CsB CLAYTIeOKmmOryZ5lzpU2f6XZWrgfXG0oAkMf8M/7NeIBav0XP9rb9xLhhfeKVhk9C3r UEKAM/U26syeG8/2HrM4/OeO72Yzj8X0oJ0nnsx9JCTn2W8/6Lktr4qwFm7dRn59tD6c wgvw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id :arc-authentication-results; bh=kjx3+ezXRmp/NCkmpYEwwvQmlz1i6ej202QX8ANQYwo=; b=lqtzqXyxVGY+yYEEMDLVDm71RUcoK8879QS40QwzIKkqjGPImtpsT1c2zoTSL1R9FJ FeeS6+MZRw8F3HOsRtoEeolfyuRBsJkJ47Z4/MUmM2qSXRFJ8Oqtttk1OCy62s4iVp9M hJsqDo7UmvCuBOFBpV4mw0uecW4yIluE5pOnflRFU7hEBrYbUi3cZxBO41asNaq+cuMG 2ygvuXX1cgl7HlfTPiImOWeEMfVrP/kM1b0WmWU2W3510krln09KGvcobHBWXDoiGQcl I3Eocl/L5lb0yVeVWWSJE79ibGIxQ7C4ovKORT+zZ9z14PWPL1YFBPSqm20pF4pZQx9e mkZA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w20-v6si3064495pfn.12.2018.05.16.08.47.47; Wed, 16 May 2018 08:48:01 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751976AbeEPPq2 (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 16 May 2018 11:46:28 -0400 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([192.55.52.115]:33242 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750775AbeEPPqZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 May 2018 11:46:25 -0400 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga005.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.32]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 May 2018 08:46:24 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.49,406,1520924400"; d="scan'208";a="229031108" Received: from spandruv-desk.jf.intel.com ([10.54.75.31]) by fmsmga005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 May 2018 08:46:24 -0700 Message-ID: <1526485584.61700.19.camel@linux.intel.com> Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT] [PATCH 10/10] cpufreq: intel_pstate: enable boost for SKX From: Srinivas Pandruvada To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@suse.de, lenb@kernel.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net, mgorman@techsingularity.net, x86@kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, juri.lelli@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 08:46:24 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20180516074948.GZ12217@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20180516044911.28797-1-srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> <20180516044911.28797-11-srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> <20180516074948.GZ12217@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.24.6 (3.24.6-1.fc26) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2018-05-16 at 09:49 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 09:49:11PM -0700, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: > > Enable HWP boost on Skylake server platform. > > Why not unconditionally enable it on everything HWP ? Never noticed in any difference performance in clients with HWP nor anybody complained. Since clients uses single power domain, some other CPUs always gives boost. Thanks, Srinivas