Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 16 Mar 2001 15:47:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 16 Mar 2001 15:47:22 -0500 Received: from zeus.kernel.org ([209.10.41.242]:2278 "EHLO zeus.kernel.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 16 Mar 2001 15:47:12 -0500 Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 12:16:54 +0000 From: "Stephen C. Tweedie" To: Anton Blanchard Cc: torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Tweedie Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Only one memory zone for sparc64 Message-ID: <20010316121654.C1771@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20010315191352.D1598@linuxcare.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010315191352.D1598@linuxcare.com>; from anton@linuxcare.com.au on Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 07:13:52PM +1100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 07:13:52PM +1100, Anton Blanchard wrote: > > On sparc64 we dont care about the different memory zones and iterating > through them all over the place only serves to waste CPU. I suspect this > would be the case with some other architectures but for the moment I > have just enabled it for sparc64. > > With this patch I get close to a 1% improvement in dbench on the dual > ultra60. I'd be surprised if dbench was anything other than disk-bound on most systems. On any of my machines, the standard error of a single dbench run is *way* larger than 1%, and I'd expect to have to run the benchmark a dozen times to get a confidence interval small enough to detect a 1% performance change: are your runs repeatable enough to be this sensitive to the effect of the allocator? Cheers, Stephen - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/