Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     akpm@linux-foundation.org, mhocko@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
        kirill@shutemov.name, ak@linux.intel.com, dave@stgolabs.net,
        jack@suse.cz, Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
        khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com, aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
        benh@kernel.crashing.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, paulus@samba.org,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, hpa@zytor.com,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
        sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
        kemi.wang@intel.com, Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
        Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>,
        Ganesh Mahendran <opensource.ganesh@gmail.com>,
        Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
        Punit Agrawal <punitagrawal@gmail.com>,
        vinayak menon <vinayakm.list@gmail.com>,
        Yang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        haren@linux.vnet.ibm.com, npiggin@gmail.com, bsingharora@gmail.com,
        paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
        linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, x86@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v11 24/26] x86/mm: add speculative pagefault handling
Date:   Thu, 17 May 2018 13:06:31 +0200
In-Reply-To: <1526555193-7242-1-git-send-email-ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
References: <1526555193-7242-1-git-send-email-ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <1526555193-7242-25-git-send-email-ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>

Try a speculative fault before acquiring mmap_sem, if it returns with
VM_FAULT_RETRY continue with the mmap_sem acquisition and do the
traditional fault.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>

[Clearing of FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY is now done in
 handle_speculative_fault()]
[Retry with usual fault path in the case VM_ERROR is returned by
 handle_speculative_fault(). This allows signal to be delivered]
[Don't build SPF call if !CONFIG_SPECULATIVE_PAGE_FAULT]
[Handle memory protection key fault]
Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
index fd84edf82252..11944bfc805a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
@@ -1224,7 +1224,7 @@ __do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code,
 	struct mm_struct *mm;
 	int fault, major = 0;
 	unsigned int flags = FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY | FAULT_FLAG_KILLABLE;
-	u32 pkey;
+	u32 pkey, *pt_pkey = &pkey;
 
 	tsk = current;
 	mm = tsk->mm;
@@ -1314,6 +1314,27 @@ __do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code,
 		flags |= FAULT_FLAG_INSTRUCTION;
 
 	/*
+	 * Do not try to do a speculative page fault if the fault was due to
+	 * protection keys since it can't be resolved.
+	 */
+	if (!(error_code & X86_PF_PK)) {
+		fault = handle_speculative_fault(mm, address, flags);
+		if (fault != VM_FAULT_RETRY) {
+			perf_sw_event(PERF_COUNT_SW_SPF, 1, regs, address);
+			/*
+			 * Do not advertise for the pkey value since we don't
+			 * know it.
+			 * This is not a matter as we checked for X86_PF_PK
+			 * earlier, so we should not handle pkey fault here,
+			 * but to be sure that mm_fault_error() callees will
+			 * not try to use it, we invalidate the pointer.
+			 */
+			pt_pkey = NULL;
+			goto done;
+		}
+	}
+
+	/*
 	 * When running in the kernel we expect faults to occur only to
 	 * addresses in user space.  All other faults represent errors in
 	 * the kernel and should generate an OOPS.  Unfortunately, in the
@@ -1427,8 +1448,10 @@ __do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code,
 	}
 
 	up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
+
+done:
 	if (unlikely(fault & VM_FAULT_ERROR)) {
-		mm_fault_error(regs, error_code, address, &pkey, fault);
+		mm_fault_error(regs, error_code, address, pt_pkey, fault);
 		return;
 	}
 
-- 
2.7.4