Received: by 2002:ac0:a594:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m20-v6csp3145367imm; Thu, 17 May 2018 04:15:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZrftHhK/JJ03JCiR2wBlmWVia9g+0tjZniodkvv+s1sfRdVFgmKUh7V2laKzeewaPcxBbmp X-Received: by 2002:a63:be01:: with SMTP id l1-v6mr3732453pgf.267.1526555727593; Thu, 17 May 2018 04:15:27 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1526555727; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=D1s6L9mlBUTTa4flgPYbQ4Bbj1jFobB3fx3ybsF+FCh7IzMFxd1DSkKgP5/tltO/QI nugbjcxDwQDqpufqCu9QK8asrjxgLQ4hvzg+Jhg0nIjYFqZPy5JbS7crR+zjBqJMBfEy AVv1rAJoezfUplV7G/HRUrNH/uESAzPMP38/stxz6KZOK/tgDZqNE6HTZaraRBgo2Se9 BGwnkGZU6JoxItA5T7rOUZ40GO5TbDZ9xlxOeUuOF9Tg/wXGMJVaNjhgWASIyWGW+q05 ZsFdFIowU71jNeWASuqaHL37j3qCCA2NrGCg3ME9JG6gNJJIHYkqUXNi6Yi3lDxnp6AA vZxQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:cc:references:to :subject:arc-authentication-results; bh=JJDe2FFaJFujU6OdjmV81gzl0Se0bDPeq2T+hGnLeEU=; b=raGdCKSaKS544owjyX8/4zg4xPcx0/osz47sE5fuU27VuXkaN6+w227HQiMTSF82mE LEgWOUCXZJE/9YYYh6hA7YO472DMQlqLYSz7mQji+AqcjTjYnnQ+5c3fSlu8WAtrM+vz 3AnE9e8eB53MRJYnTqCz6DI6DWfz77coZ+xNpf/bkHjLc8PkgMzdEtt8KV8X23ysCpZV oW39AK/n0wA+YNBZYaIaTpjcUU3ce20a5ijxcoAPGStKmdWhunKS4ysy8S1vHqyv6fpN 9FnwNo7j32hhxK9ZQdkoDhansB7XZmkrJlRAQWf0r7plor3tg2oODAMxnRfwkbMk2Tyo K7Sg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d6-v6si3788048pgc.140.2018.05.17.04.15.13; Thu, 17 May 2018 04:15:27 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752425AbeEQLM1 (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 17 May 2018 07:12:27 -0400 Received: from szxga07-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.35]:47842 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752349AbeEQLMX (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 May 2018 07:12:23 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS408-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.58]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id CE96C76E3F423; Thu, 17 May 2018 19:12:18 +0800 (CST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.202.227.238) by DGGEMS408-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.208) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.361.1; Thu, 17 May 2018 19:12:15 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] ThunderX2: Add Cavium ThunderX2 SoC UNCORE PMU driver To: Ganapatrao Kulkarni , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" References: <20180516045518.6876-1-ganapatrao.kulkarni@cavium.com> <20180516045518.6876-3-ganapatrao.kulkarni@cavium.com> CC: "mark.rutland@arm.com" , "Vadim.Lomovtsev@cavium.com" , "Jan.Glauber@cavium.com" , "Will.Deacon@arm.com" , "gklkml16@gmail.com" , "Robert.Richter@cavium.com" , "jnair@caviumnetworks.com" From: John Garry Message-ID: <8f2f9e2c-50c1-bf93-525f-ebf93c69bcd7@huawei.com> Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 12:12:05 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180516045518.6876-3-ganapatrao.kulkarni@cavium.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.202.227.238] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 16/05/2018 05:55, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote: > This patch adds a perf driver for the PMU UNCORE devices DDR4 Memory > Controller(DMC) and Level 3 Cache(L3C). > Hi, Just some coding comments below: > ThunderX2 has 8 independent DMC PMUs to capture performance events > corresponding to 8 channels of DDR4 Memory Controller and 16 independent > L3C PMUs to capture events corresponding to 16 tiles of L3 cache. > Each PMU supports up to 4 counters. All counters lack overflow interrupt > and are sampled periodically. > > Signed-off-by: Ganapatrao Kulkarni > --- > drivers/perf/Kconfig | 8 + > drivers/perf/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/perf/thunderx2_pmu.c | 965 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > include/linux/cpuhotplug.h | 1 + > 4 files changed, 975 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 drivers/perf/thunderx2_pmu.c > > diff --git a/drivers/perf/Kconfig b/drivers/perf/Kconfig > index 28bb5a0..eafd0fc 100644 > --- a/drivers/perf/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/perf/Kconfig > @@ -85,6 +85,14 @@ config QCOM_L3_PMU > Adds the L3 cache PMU into the perf events subsystem for > monitoring L3 cache events. > > +config THUNDERX2_PMU > + bool "Cavium ThunderX2 SoC PMU UNCORE" > + depends on ARCH_THUNDER2 && PERF_EVENTS && ACPI Is the explicit dependency for PERF_EVENTS required, since we're under the PERF_EVENTS menu? And IIRC for other perf drivers we required a dependency on ARM64 - is that required here also? I see arm_smccc_smc() calls in the code... > + help > + Provides support for ThunderX2 UNCORE events. > + The SoC has PMU support in its L3 cache controller (L3C) and > + in the DDR4 Memory Controller (DMC). > + > config XGENE_PMU > depends on ARCH_XGENE > bool "APM X-Gene SoC PMU" > diff --git a/drivers/perf/Makefile b/drivers/perf/Makefile > index b3902bd..909f27f 100644 > --- a/drivers/perf/Makefile > +++ b/drivers/perf/Makefile > @@ -7,5 +7,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_PMU_ACPI) += arm_pmu_acpi.o > obj-$(CONFIG_HISI_PMU) += hisilicon/ > obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_L2_PMU) += qcom_l2_pmu.o > obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_L3_PMU) += qcom_l3_pmu.o > +obj-$(CONFIG_THUNDERX2_PMU) += thunderx2_pmu.o > obj-$(CONFIG_XGENE_PMU) += xgene_pmu.o > obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_SPE_PMU) += arm_spe_pmu.o > diff --git a/drivers/perf/thunderx2_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/thunderx2_pmu.c > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..0401443 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/perf/thunderx2_pmu.c > @@ -0,0 +1,965 @@ > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > +/* > + * CAVIUM THUNDERX2 SoC PMU UNCORE > + * > + * Copyright (C) 2018 Cavium Inc. > + * Author: Ganapatrao Kulkarni > + * > + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify > + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as > + * published by the Free Software Foundation. > + * > + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, > + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of > + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the > + * GNU General Public License for more details. > + * > + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License > + * along with this program. If not, see . > + */ Isn't this the same as the SPDX? > + > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > + > +/* L3c and DMC has 16 and 8 channels per socket respectively. L3C, right? > + * Each Channel supports UNCORE PMU device and consists of > + * 4 independent programmable counters. Counters are 32 bit > + * and does not support overflow interrupt, they needs to be /s/needs/need/, /s/does/do/ > + * sampled before overflow(i.e, at every 2 seconds). how can you ensure that this value is low enough? "I saw this comment in previous patch: > Given that all channels compete for access to the muxed register > interface, I suspect we need to try more often than once every 2 > seconds... 2 seconds seems to be sufficient. So far testing looks good." Can you provide any more analytical reasoning than this? > + */ > + > +#define UNCORE_MAX_COUNTERS 4 > +#define UNCORE_L3_MAX_TILES 16 > +#define UNCORE_DMC_MAX_CHANNELS 8 > + > +#define UNCORE_HRTIMER_INTERVAL (2 * NSEC_PER_SEC) > +#define GET_EVENTID(ev) ((ev->hw.config) & 0x1ff) > +#define GET_COUNTERID(ev) ((ev->hw.idx) & 0xf) > +#define GET_CHANNELID(pmu_uncore) (pmu_uncore->channel) > +#define DMC_EVENT_CFG(idx, val) ((val) << (((idx) * 8) + 1)) > + > +#define DMC_COUNTER_CTL 0x234 > +#define DMC_COUNTER_DATA 0x240 > +#define L3C_COUNTER_CTL 0xA8 > +#define L3C_COUNTER_DATA 0xAC I feel it's generally better to keep register offsets in numeric order (if indeed, that is what they are) > + > +#define THUNDERX2_SMC_CALL_ID 0xC200FF00 > +#define THUNDERX2_SMC_SET_CHANNEL 0xB010 > + > +enum thunderx2_uncore_l3_events { > + L3_EVENT_NONE, > + L3_EVENT_NBU_CANCEL, > + L3_EVENT_DIB_RETRY, > + L3_EVENT_DOB_RETRY, > + L3_EVENT_DIB_CREDIT_RETRY, > + L3_EVENT_DOB_CREDIT_RETRY, > + L3_EVENT_FORCE_RETRY, > + L3_EVENT_IDX_CONFLICT_RETRY, > + L3_EVENT_EVICT_CONFLICT_RETRY, > + L3_EVENT_BANK_CONFLICT_RETRY, > + L3_EVENT_FILL_ENTRY_RETRY, > + L3_EVENT_EVICT_NOT_READY_RETRY, > + L3_EVENT_L3_RETRY, > + L3_EVENT_READ_REQ, > + L3_EVENT_WRITE_BACK_REQ, > + L3_EVENT_INVALIDATE_NWRITE_REQ, > + L3_EVENT_INV_REQ, > + L3_EVENT_SELF_REQ, > + L3_EVENT_REQ, > + L3_EVENT_EVICT_REQ, > + L3_EVENT_INVALIDATE_NWRITE_HIT, > + L3_EVENT_INVALIDATE_HIT, > + L3_EVENT_SELF_HIT, > + L3_EVENT_READ_HIT, > + L3_EVENT_MAX, ',' required? > +}; > + > +enum thunderx2_uncore_dmc_events { > + DMC_EVENT_NONE, > + DMC_EVENT_COUNT_CYCLES, > + DMC_EVENT_RES2, > + DMC_EVENT_RES3, > + DMC_EVENT_RES4, > + DMC_EVENT_RES5, > + DMC_EVENT_RES6, > + DMC_EVENT_RES7, > + DMC_EVENT_RES8, > + DMC_EVENT_READ_64B_TXNS, > + DMC_EVENT_READ_BELOW_64B_TXNS, > + DMC_EVENT_WRITE_TXNS, > + DMC_EVENT_TXN_CYCLES, > + DMC_EVENT_DATA_TRANSFERS, > + DMC_EVENT_CANCELLED_READ_TXNS, > + DMC_EVENT_CONSUMED_READ_TXNS, > + DMC_EVENT_MAX, ditto > +}; > + > +enum thunderx2_uncore_type { > + PMU_TYPE_L3C, > + PMU_TYPE_DMC, > + PMU_TYPE_INVALID, > +}; > + > +/* > + * pmu on each socket has 2 uncore devices(dmc and l3), > + * each uncore device has up to 16 channels, each channel can sample > + * events independently with counters up to 4. > + * > + * struct thunderx2_pmu_uncore_channel created per channel. > + * struct thunderx2_pmu_uncore_dev per uncore device. this comment is a bit obvious > + */ > +struct thunderx2_pmu_uncore_channel { > + struct pmu pmu; > + struct hlist_node node; > + struct thunderx2_pmu_uncore_dev *uncore_dev; > + int channel; > + int cpu; > + DECLARE_BITMAP(active_counters, UNCORE_MAX_COUNTERS); > + struct perf_event *events[UNCORE_MAX_COUNTERS]; > + struct hrtimer hrtimer; > + /* to sync counter alloc/release */ > + raw_spinlock_t lock; > +}; > + > +struct thunderx2_pmu_uncore_dev { > + char *name; > + struct device *dev; > + enum thunderx2_uncore_type type; > + void __iomem *base; > + int node; > + u32 max_counters; > + u32 max_channels; > + u32 max_events; > + u64 hrtimer_interval; > + /* this lock synchronizes across channels */ > + raw_spinlock_t lock; > + const struct attribute_group **attr_groups; > + void (*init_cntr_base)(struct perf_event *event, > + struct thunderx2_pmu_uncore_dev *uncore_dev); > + void (*select_channel)(struct perf_event *event); > + void (*stop_event)(struct perf_event *event); > + void (*start_event)(struct perf_event *event, int flags); > +}; > + > +static inline struct thunderx2_pmu_uncore_channel * is inline keyword required or even used generally? Since static, can't the compiler figure this out? > +pmu_to_thunderx2_pmu_uncore(struct pmu *pmu) > +{ > + return container_of(pmu, struct thunderx2_pmu_uncore_channel, pmu); > +} > + > +/* > + * sysfs format attributes > + */ can't this comment fit on a single line? > +static ssize_t thunderx2_pmu_format_show(struct device *dev, > + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf) > +{ > + struct dev_ext_attribute *eattr; > + > + eattr = container_of(attr, struct dev_ext_attribute, attr); > + return sprintf(buf, "%s\n", (char *) eattr->var); > +} > + > +#define FORMAT_ATTR(_name, _config) \ > + (&((struct dev_ext_attribute[]) { \ > + { \ > + .attr = __ATTR(_name, 0444, thunderx2_pmu_format_show, NULL), \ > + .var = (void *) _config, \ > + } \ > + })[0].attr.attr) > + > +static struct attribute *l3c_pmu_format_attrs[] = { > + FORMAT_ATTR(event, "config:0-4"), > + NULL, > +}; > + > +static struct attribute *dmc_pmu_format_attrs[] = { > + FORMAT_ATTR(event, "config:0-4"), > + NULL, > +}; > + > +static const struct attribute_group l3c_pmu_format_attr_group = { > + .name = "format", > + .attrs = l3c_pmu_format_attrs, > +}; > + > +static const struct attribute_group dmc_pmu_format_attr_group = { > + .name = "format", > + .attrs = dmc_pmu_format_attrs, > +}; > + [ ... ] > + * Per PMU device attribute groups > + */ > +static const struct attribute_group *l3c_pmu_attr_groups[] = { > + &l3c_pmu_format_attr_group, > + &pmu_cpumask_attr_group, > + &l3c_pmu_events_attr_group, > + NULL > +}; > + > +static const struct attribute_group *dmc_pmu_attr_groups[] = { > + &dmc_pmu_format_attr_group, > + &pmu_cpumask_attr_group, > + &dmc_pmu_events_attr_group, > + NULL > +}; > + > +static inline u32 reg_readl(unsigned long addr) > +{ > + return readl((void __iomem *)addr); > +} > + > +static inline void reg_writel(u32 val, unsigned long addr) > +{ > + writel(val, (void __iomem *)addr); > +} > + > +static int alloc_counter(struct thunderx2_pmu_uncore_channel *pmu_uncore) > +{ > + int counter; > + > + raw_spin_lock(&pmu_uncore->lock); > + counter = find_first_zero_bit(pmu_uncore->active_counters, > + pmu_uncore->uncore_dev->max_counters); > + if (counter == pmu_uncore->uncore_dev->max_counters) { > + raw_spin_unlock(&pmu_uncore->lock); > + return -ENOSPC; > + } > + set_bit(counter, pmu_uncore->active_counters); > + raw_spin_unlock(&pmu_uncore->lock); > + return counter; > +} > + > +static void free_counter( > + struct thunderx2_pmu_uncore_channel *pmu_uncore, int counter) strange formatting > +{ > + raw_spin_lock(&pmu_uncore->lock); > + clear_bit(counter, pmu_uncore->active_counters); > + raw_spin_unlock(&pmu_uncore->lock); > +} > + [ ... ] > +static void uncore_stop_event_l3c(struct perf_event *event) > +{ > + reg_writel(0, event->hw.config_base); > +} > + > +static void uncore_start_event_dmc(struct perf_event *event, int flags) > +{ > + u32 val; > + struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw; > + int idx = GET_COUNTERID(event); > + int event_type = GET_EVENTID(event); > + > + /* enable and start counters. > + * 8 bits for each counter, bits[05:01] of a counter to set event type. > + */ > + val = reg_readl(hwc->config_base); > + val &= ~DMC_EVENT_CFG(idx, 0x1f); > + val |= DMC_EVENT_CFG(idx, event_type); > + reg_writel(val, hwc->config_base); > + local64_set(&hwc->prev_count, 0); > + reg_writel(0, hwc->event_base); > +} > + > +static void uncore_stop_event_dmc(struct perf_event *event) > +{ > + u32 val; > + struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw; > + int idx = GET_COUNTERID(event); > + > + /* clear event type(bits[05:01]) to stop counter */ > + val = reg_readl(hwc->config_base); > + val &= ~DMC_EVENT_CFG(idx, 0x1f); > + reg_writel(val, hwc->config_base); > +} > + > +static void init_cntr_base_l3c(struct perf_event *event, > + struct thunderx2_pmu_uncore_dev *uncore_dev) > +{ > + struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw; > + > + /* counter ctrl/data reg offset at 8 */ > + hwc->config_base = (unsigned long)uncore_dev->base > + + L3C_COUNTER_CTL + (8 * GET_COUNTERID(event)); > + hwc->event_base = (unsigned long)uncore_dev->base > + + L3C_COUNTER_DATA + (8 * GET_COUNTERID(event)); Is there a better way to hold this, since we're casting back to a void * when writing to the register? > +} > + > +static void init_cntr_base_dmc(struct perf_event *event, > + struct thunderx2_pmu_uncore_dev *uncore_dev) > +{ > + struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw; > + > + hwc->config_base = (unsigned long)uncore_dev->base > + + DMC_COUNTER_CTL; > + /* counter data reg offset at 0xc */ > + hwc->event_base = (unsigned long)uncore_dev->base > + + DMC_COUNTER_DATA + (0xc * GET_COUNTERID(event)); > +} > + > +static void thunderx2_uncore_update(struct perf_event *event) > +{ > + s64 prev, new = 0; > + u64 delta; > + struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw; > + struct thunderx2_pmu_uncore_channel *pmu_uncore; > + enum thunderx2_uncore_type type; > + > + pmu_uncore = pmu_to_thunderx2_pmu_uncore(event->pmu); > + type = pmu_uncore->uncore_dev->type; > + > + pmu_uncore->uncore_dev->select_channel(event); > + > + new = reg_readl(hwc->event_base); > + prev = local64_xchg(&hwc->prev_count, new); > + > + /* handles rollover of 32 bit counter */ > + delta = (u32)(((1UL << 32) - prev) + new); > + local64_add(delta, &event->count); > +} > + > +enum thunderx2_uncore_type get_uncore_device_type(struct acpi_device *adev) > +{ > + int i = 0; > + struct acpi_uncore_device { > + __u8 id[ACPI_ID_LEN]; > + enum thunderx2_uncore_type type; > + } devices[] = { > + {"CAV901D", PMU_TYPE_L3C}, > + {"CAV901F", PMU_TYPE_DMC}, > + {"", PMU_TYPE_INVALID}, for sentinels, ',' should not be required > + }; > + > + while (devices[i].type != PMU_TYPE_INVALID) { > + if (!strcmp(acpi_device_hid(adev), devices[i].id)) > + return devices[i].type; Can't you use acpi_match_device()? > + i++; > + } > + return PMU_TYPE_INVALID; > +} > + > +/* > + * We must NOT create groups containing events from multiple hardware PMUs, > + * although mixing different software and hardware PMUs is allowed. > + */ > +static bool thunderx2_uncore_validate_event_group(struct perf_event *event) [ ... ] > + > +static int thunderx2_pmu_uncore_add(struct thunderx2_pmu_uncore_dev *uncore_dev, > + int channel) > +{ > + struct thunderx2_pmu_uncore_channel *pmu_uncore; > + int ret, cpu; > + > + pmu_uncore = devm_kzalloc(uncore_dev->dev, sizeof(*pmu_uncore), > + GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!pmu_uncore) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + cpu = cpumask_any_and(cpumask_of_node(uncore_dev->node), > + cpu_online_mask); > + if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + pmu_uncore->cpu = cpu; > + pmu_uncore->channel = channel; > + pmu_uncore->uncore_dev = uncore_dev; > + > + hrtimer_init(&pmu_uncore->hrtimer, CLOCK_MONOTONIC, HRTIMER_MODE_REL); > + pmu_uncore->hrtimer.function = thunderx2_uncore_hrtimer_callback; > + > + ret = thunderx2_pmu_uncore_register(pmu_uncore); > + if (ret) { > + dev_err(uncore_dev->dev, "%s PMU: Failed to init driver\n", > + uncore_dev->name); > + return -ENODEV; > + } > + > + /* register hotplug callback for the pmu */ > + ret = cpuhp_state_add_instance( > + CPUHP_AP_PERF_ARM_THUNDERX2_UNCORE_ONLINE, > + &pmu_uncore->node); > + if (ret) { > + dev_err(uncore_dev->dev, "Error %d registering hotplug", ret); > + return ret; > + } > + > + dev_dbg(uncore_dev->dev, "%s PMU UNCORE registered\n", > + pmu_uncore->pmu.name); strange alignment, and many more times in the code > + return ret; > +} > + > +static struct thunderx2_pmu_uncore_dev *init_pmu_uncore_dev( > + struct device *dev, acpi_handle handle, > + struct acpi_device *adev, u32 type) > +{ > + struct thunderx2_pmu_uncore_dev *uncore_dev; > + void __iomem *base; > + struct resource res; > + struct resource_entry *rentry; > + struct list_head list; > + int ret; > + > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&list); > + ret = acpi_dev_get_resources(adev, &list, NULL, NULL); > + if (ret <= 0) { > + dev_err(dev, "failed to parse _CRS method, error %d\n", ret); > + return NULL; > + } > + > + list_for_each_entry(rentry, &list, node) { > + if (resource_type(rentry->res) == IORESOURCE_MEM) { > + res = *rentry->res; > + break; > + } > + } what I am missing that you can not use platform_get_resource(,IORESOURCE_MEM,)? And I also wonder if you need all the device-related arguments for the code > + > + if (!rentry->res) > + return NULL; > + > + acpi_dev_free_resource_list(&list); > + base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, &res); > + if (IS_ERR(base)) { > + dev_err(dev, "PMU type %d: Fail to map resource\n", type); > + return NULL; > + } > + > + uncore_dev = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*uncore_dev), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!uncore_dev) > + return NULL; > + > + uncore_dev->dev = dev; > + uncore_dev->type = type; > + uncore_dev->base = base; > + uncore_dev->node = dev_to_node(dev); > + > + raw_spin_lock_init(&uncore_dev->lock); > + > + switch (uncore_dev->type) { if we can re-arrange, isn't it better to do the steps which can fail before the steps which can't? > + case PMU_TYPE_L3C: > + uncore_dev->max_counters = UNCORE_MAX_COUNTERS; > + uncore_dev->max_channels = UNCORE_L3_MAX_TILES; > + uncore_dev->max_events = L3_EVENT_MAX; > + uncore_dev->hrtimer_interval = UNCORE_HRTIMER_INTERVAL; > + uncore_dev->attr_groups = l3c_pmu_attr_groups; > + uncore_dev->name = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, > + "uncore_l3c_%d", uncore_dev->node); > + uncore_dev->init_cntr_base = init_cntr_base_l3c; > + uncore_dev->start_event = uncore_start_event_l3c; > + uncore_dev->stop_event = uncore_stop_event_l3c; > + uncore_dev->select_channel = uncore_select_channel; it's possible to bring the common code outside the swicth statement, but probably not worth it > + break; > + case PMU_TYPE_DMC: > + uncore_dev->max_counters = UNCORE_MAX_COUNTERS; > + uncore_dev->max_channels = UNCORE_DMC_MAX_CHANNELS; > + uncore_dev->max_events = DMC_EVENT_MAX; > + uncore_dev->hrtimer_interval = UNCORE_HRTIMER_INTERVAL; > + uncore_dev->attr_groups = dmc_pmu_attr_groups; > + uncore_dev->name = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, > + "uncore_dmc_%d", uncore_dev->node); > + uncore_dev->init_cntr_base = init_cntr_base_dmc; > + uncore_dev->start_event = uncore_start_event_dmc; > + uncore_dev->stop_event = uncore_stop_event_dmc; > + uncore_dev->select_channel = uncore_select_channel; > + break; > + case PMU_TYPE_INVALID: > + devm_kfree(dev, uncore_dev); do you really need this? > + uncore_dev = NULL; > + break; return NULL And don't we require a default statement? > + } > + > + return uncore_dev; > +} > + > +static acpi_status thunderx2_pmu_uncore_dev_add(acpi_handle handle, u32 level, > + void *data, void **return_value) > +{ > + struct thunderx2_pmu_uncore_dev *uncore_dev; > + struct acpi_device *adev; > + enum thunderx2_uncore_type type; > + int channel; > + > + if (acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &adev)) > + return AE_OK; > + if (acpi_bus_get_status(adev) || !adev->status.present) > + return AE_OK; > + > + type = get_uncore_device_type(adev); > + if (type == PMU_TYPE_INVALID) > + return AE_OK; > + > + uncore_dev = init_pmu_uncore_dev((struct device *)data, handle, no need to cast void * > + adev, type); > + > + if (!uncore_dev) > + return AE_ERROR; > + > + for (channel = 0; channel < uncore_dev->max_channels; channel++) { > + if (thunderx2_pmu_uncore_add(uncore_dev, channel)) { > + /* Can't add the PMU device, abort */ > + return AE_ERROR; > + } > + } > + return AE_OK; > +} > + > +static int thunderx2_uncore_pmu_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu, > + struct hlist_node *node) > +{ > + int new_cpu; > + struct thunderx2_pmu_uncore_channel *pmu_uncore; > + > + pmu_uncore = hlist_entry_safe(node, > + struct thunderx2_pmu_uncore_channel, node); > + if (cpu != pmu_uncore->cpu) > + return 0; > + > + new_cpu = cpumask_any_and( > + cpumask_of_node(pmu_uncore->uncore_dev->node), > + cpu_online_mask); > + if (new_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids) > + return 0; > + > + pmu_uncore->cpu = new_cpu; > + perf_pmu_migrate_context(&pmu_uncore->pmu, cpu, new_cpu); > + return 0; > +} > + > +static const struct acpi_device_id thunderx2_uncore_acpi_match[] = { > + {"CAV901C", 0}, > + {}, no ',' required > +}; > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, thunderx2_uncore_acpi_match); > + > +static int thunderx2_uncore_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > +{ > + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; > + acpi_handle handle; > + acpi_status status; > + > + set_dev_node(dev, acpi_get_node(ACPI_HANDLE(dev))); Is this already done when the platform device is created in ACPI enumeration? I assume the child devices have enumerated at this point. > + > + /* Make sure firmware supports DMC/L3C set channel smc call */ > + if (test_uncore_select_channel_early(dev)) > + return -ENODEV; > + > + if (!has_acpi_companion(dev)) > + return -ENODEV; > + > + handle = ACPI_HANDLE(dev); > + if (!handle) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + /* Walk through the tree for all PMU UNCORE devices */ > + status = acpi_walk_namespace(ACPI_TYPE_DEVICE, handle, 1, > + thunderx2_pmu_uncore_dev_add, > + NULL, dev, NULL); > + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) { > + dev_err(dev, "failed to probe PMU devices\n"); > + return_ACPI_STATUS(status); > + } > + > + dev_info(dev, "node%d: pmu uncore registered\n", dev_to_node(dev)); > + return 0; > +} > + > +static struct platform_driver thunderx2_uncore_driver = { > + .probe = thunderx2_uncore_probe, why no remove? > + .driver = { > + .name = "thunderx2-uncore-pmu", > + .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(thunderx2_uncore_acpi_match), > + }, > +}; > + > +static int __init register_thunderx2_uncore_driver(void) > +{ > + int ret; > + > + ret = cpuhp_setup_state_multi(CPUHP_AP_PERF_ARM_THUNDERX2_UNCORE_ONLINE, > + "perf/tx2/uncore:online", > + NULL, > + thunderx2_uncore_pmu_offline_cpu); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + return platform_driver_register(&thunderx2_uncore_driver); > + > +} > +device_initcall(register_thunderx2_uncore_driver); > diff --git a/include/linux/cpuhotplug.h b/include/linux/cpuhotplug.h > index 8796ba3..eb0c896 100644 > --- a/include/linux/cpuhotplug.h > +++ b/include/linux/cpuhotplug.h > @@ -161,6 +161,7 @@ enum cpuhp_state { > CPUHP_AP_PERF_ARM_L2X0_ONLINE, > CPUHP_AP_PERF_ARM_QCOM_L2_ONLINE, > CPUHP_AP_PERF_ARM_QCOM_L3_ONLINE, > + CPUHP_AP_PERF_ARM_THUNDERX2_UNCORE_ONLINE, > CPUHP_AP_PERF_POWERPC_NEST_IMC_ONLINE, > CPUHP_AP_PERF_POWERPC_CORE_IMC_ONLINE, > CPUHP_AP_PERF_POWERPC_THREAD_IMC_ONLINE, >