Received: by 2002:ac0:a594:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m20-v6csp3375536imm; Thu, 17 May 2018 07:50:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZqvPYGoTWLCJpdlHs8iqbtHdXMU9c/OByvutxP8vUwIt10pWQSSuA6kcVx1UFPxLDiISOnj X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:42a3:: with SMTP id h32-v6mr5565679pld.72.1526568658529; Thu, 17 May 2018 07:50:58 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1526568658; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=LTVw49L4eMRHfhGTGwOuvD1MFoUsRvUC/o3dQDIkVxTQCLdWm+Nhbel+pDcQ8vF1Ta 5Lkdnx6WSVWhm7deSY086nzBJUdVu1QmqHQxMvu3VVd9wikn6Eu70i3eFz1yi3C0Ux4Z EG899ebGJAZQjP+ihh8LuPMZrwXrJ+/YjlSkF8q2365R6LHQt7nfqFZi6Lruryzzi2Uy AJX13ixvdgcoHNpACQL1I6qxol7OSCLLW17yuU4XHDpdVKjuHC7RTkuEjKBSAYCnd4ZE 0tILsRrdrTrOkcL4ZjI7I1yN8iKDIi09giu/fKkFNmFVO36+OizcNpfFz+lQPR/4PsUn Jq/Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:references:in-reply-to:date :subject:cc:to:from:arc-authentication-results; bh=rx3LUSXdIXX0sN+62fEwINbGglSzSV+VwIEfHF16/y0=; b=bt++x644/TtlEMcZ2/cBgWuWADAyMeCnOM+Q7qurB9yPmPeOsQ/+OPTxSc6/BvyqFm cfXhUS+NXyZr9ADF2qjn2nNzIygXDvNBaVcjildJ4gsfkLPwPJkTQB9eZRa3jn3RcM2y AjmmHvkem36pK6YT+fuPQGklka2Xp0CHY3HYE4wpUbZqCeyGEVUrWIlkkLBw4R9r6zsq UTdQf/F8uDZDG4GynLUj+/VTaJwDi7LkPv3t7Ib+A//ODa16ufzslbmo56SYH5PY/a33 ZOwwp+w7Z59nTknnY0wxF895EczkF9tzOgioRVlJU7QSyjCCED2Vb6R20t5RAYKxtO8J +w2g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o7-v6si4134199pgp.525.2018.05.17.07.50.43; Thu, 17 May 2018 07:50:58 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752593AbeEQOuA (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 17 May 2018 10:50:00 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:38196 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752501AbeEQOt4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 May 2018 10:49:56 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098420.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w4HEjRXQ145568 for ; Thu, 17 May 2018 10:49:56 -0400 Received: from e06smtp13.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp13.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.109]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2j199r839a-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 17 May 2018 10:49:55 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp13.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 17 May 2018 15:49:54 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.196) by e06smtp13.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.143) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Thu, 17 May 2018 15:49:49 +0100 Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.58]) by b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w4HEnn9l8192436; Thu, 17 May 2018 14:49:49 GMT Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9FF44C04E; Thu, 17 May 2018 15:41:37 +0100 (BST) Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 919E04C044; Thu, 17 May 2018 15:41:36 +0100 (BST) Received: from localhost.ibm.com (unknown [9.80.108.64]) by d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 May 2018 15:41:36 +0100 (BST) From: Mimi Zohar To: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Cc: Mimi Zohar , linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Howells , "Luis R . Rodriguez" , Eric Biederman , kexec@lists.infradead.org, Andres Rodriguez , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Ard Biesheuvel Subject: [PATCH v2 8/9] ima: add build time policy Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 10:48:49 -0400 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.5 In-Reply-To: <1526568530-9144-1-git-send-email-zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1526568530-9144-1-git-send-email-zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18051714-0012-0000-0000-000005D7A705 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18051714-0013-0000-0000-00001954D35E Message-Id: <1526568530-9144-9-git-send-email-zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2018-05-17_08:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1709140000 definitions=main-1805170137 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org IMA by default does not measure, appraise or audit files, but can be enabled at runtime by specifying a builtin policy on the boot command line or by loading a custom policy. This patch defines a build time policy, which verifies kernel modules, firmware, kexec image, and/or the IMA policy signatures. This build time policy is automatically enabled at runtime. The build time policy rules persist after loading a custom policy. Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar --- security/integrity/ima/Kconfig | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 101 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig b/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig index 6a8f67714c83..004919d9bf09 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig +++ b/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig @@ -156,6 +156,64 @@ config IMA_APPRAISE If unsure, say N. +config IMA_APPRAISE_BUILD_POLICY + bool "IMA build time configured policy rules" + depends on IMA_APPRAISE && INTEGRITY_ASYMMETRIC_KEYS + default n + help + This option defines an IMA appraisal policy at build time, which + is enforced at run time without having to specify a builtin + policy name on the boot command line. The build time appraisal + policy rules persist after loading a custom policy. + + Depending on the rules configured, this policy may require kernel + modules, firmware, the kexec kernel image, and/or the IMA policy + to be signed. Unsigned files might prevent the system from + booting or applications from working properly. + +config IMA_APPRAISE_REQUIRE_FIRMWARE_SIGS + bool "Appraise firmware signatures" + depends on IMA_APPRAISE_BUILD_POLICY + default n + help + This option defines a policy requiring all firmware to be signed, + including the regulatory.db. If both this option and + CFG80211_REQUIRE_SIGNED_REGDB are enabled, then both signature + verification methods are necessary. + +config IMA_APPRAISE_REQUIRE_KEXEC_SIGS + bool "Appraise kexec kernel image signatures" + depends on IMA_APPRAISE_BUILD_POLICY + default n + help + Enabling this rule will require all kexec'ed kernel images to + be signed and verified by a public key on the trusted IMA + keyring. + + Kernel image signatures can not be verified by the original + kexec_load syscall. Enabling this rule will prevent its + usage. + +config IMA_APPRAISE_REQUIRE_MODULE_SIGS + bool "Appraise kernel modules signatures" + depends on IMA_APPRAISE_BUILD_POLICY + default n + help + Enabling this rule will require all kernel modules to be signed + and verified by a public key on the trusted IMA keyring. + + Kernel module signatures can only be verified by IMA-appraisal, + via the finit_module syscall. Enabling this rule will prevent + the usage of the init_module syscall. + +config IMA_APPRAISE_REQUIRE_POLICY_SIGS + bool "Appraise IMA policy signature" + depends on IMA_APPRAISE_BUILD_POLICY + default n + help + Enabling this rule will require the IMA policy to be signed and + and verified by a key on the trusted IMA keyring. + config IMA_APPRAISE_BOOTPARAM bool "ima_appraise boot parameter" depends on IMA_APPRAISE diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c index c27f6993b07a..3c0bc8a1a88e 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ int ima_policy_flag; static int temp_ima_appraise; +static int build_ima_appraise __ro_after_init; #define MAX_LSM_RULES 6 enum lsm_rule_types { LSM_OBJ_USER, LSM_OBJ_ROLE, LSM_OBJ_TYPE, @@ -162,6 +163,25 @@ static struct ima_rule_entry default_appraise_rules[] __ro_after_init = { #endif }; +static struct ima_rule_entry build_appraise_rules[] __ro_after_init = { +#ifdef CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE_REQUIRE_MODULE_SIGS + {.action = APPRAISE, .func = MODULE_CHECK, + .flags = IMA_FUNC | IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED}, +#endif +#ifdef CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE_REQUIRE_FIRMWARE_SIGS + {.action = APPRAISE, .func = FIRMWARE_CHECK, + .flags = IMA_FUNC | IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED}, +#endif +#ifdef CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE_REQUIRE_KEXEC_SIGS + {.action = APPRAISE, .func = KEXEC_KERNEL_CHECK, + .flags = IMA_FUNC | IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED}, +#endif +#ifdef CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE_REQUIRE_POLICY_SIGS + {.action = APPRAISE, .func = POLICY_CHECK, + .flags = IMA_FUNC | IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED}, +#endif +}; + static struct ima_rule_entry secure_boot_rules[] __ro_after_init = { {.action = APPRAISE, .func = MODULE_CHECK, .flags = IMA_FUNC | IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED}, @@ -435,7 +455,7 @@ void ima_update_policy_flag(void) ima_policy_flag |= entry->action; } - ima_appraise |= temp_ima_appraise; + ima_appraise |= (build_ima_appraise | temp_ima_appraise); if (!ima_appraise) ima_policy_flag &= ~IMA_APPRAISE; } @@ -488,8 +508,8 @@ void __init ima_init_policy(void) } /* - * Insert the appraise rules requiring file signatures, prior to - * any other appraise rules. + * Insert the builtin "secure_boot" policy rules requiring file + * signatures, prior to any other appraise rules. */ for (i = 0; i < secure_boot_entries; i++) { list_add_tail(&secure_boot_rules[i].list, &ima_default_rules); @@ -497,6 +517,26 @@ void __init ima_init_policy(void) ima_appraise_flag(secure_boot_rules[i].func); } + /* + * Insert the build time appraise rules requiring file signatures + * for both the initial and custom policies, prior to other appraise + * rules. + */ + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(build_appraise_rules); i++) { + struct ima_rule_entry *entry; + + if (!secure_boot_entries) + list_add_tail(&build_appraise_rules[i].list, + &ima_default_rules); + + entry = kmemdup(&build_appraise_rules[i], sizeof(*entry), + GFP_KERNEL); + if (entry) + list_add_tail(&entry->list, &ima_policy_rules); + build_ima_appraise |= + ima_appraise_flag(build_appraise_rules[i].func); + } + for (i = 0; i < appraise_entries; i++) { list_add_tail(&default_appraise_rules[i].list, &ima_default_rules); -- 2.7.5