Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262037AbTH3PHM (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Aug 2003 11:07:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261898AbTH3PHM (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Aug 2003 11:07:12 -0400 Received: from perninha.conectiva.com.br ([200.250.58.156]:39404 "EHLO perninha.conectiva.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262037AbTH3PHI (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Aug 2003 11:07:08 -0400 Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 12:02:49 -0300 (BRT) From: Marcelo Tosatti X-X-Sender: marcelo@freak.distro.conectiva To: john stultz Cc: olof@austin.ibm.com, lkml , "Randy.Dunlap" Subject: Re: /proc/ioports overrun patch Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 732 Lines: 19 > If so, I would prefer to have a fix which outputs the full resource > information. For that we would need seq_file(). > I have a patch that converts /proc/interrupts to use seq_file as well, > however it would be much cleaner if Randy's backport of the "single" > interface went in first >http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0308.3/0296.html >Are you planning on taking that patch? Or should I just resend my patch > w/o it? I applied the seq file single interfaces now. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/