Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 18 May 2018 12:11:14 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        x86@kernel.org, nadav.amit@gmail.com,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
        Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] x86: bug: prevent gcc distortions
Message-ID: <20180518101114.GB17285@pd.tnic>
References: <20180517161402.78089-1-namit@vmware.com>
 <20180517161402.78089-3-namit@vmware.com>
 <20180518075853.GD12217@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20180518081354.GA11379@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180518081354.GA11379@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.3 (2018-01-21)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 10:13:54AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Yes, that's my main worry too about all these inlining changes:
> the very, very marked reduction in the readability of assembly code.

Same reaction here: the small improvements this brings is simply not
enough to sacrifice readability so much IMO.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.