Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 09:53:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 09:53:42 -0500 Received: from westgate.starhub.net.sg ([203.116.1.190]:43787 "EHLO westgate.starhub.net.sg") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 09:53:24 -0500 Message-ID: <3A02D150.E7E87398@usa.net> Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2000 22:53:04 +0800 From: Michael Boman Organization: Eleventh Alliance X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16-3 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: ext3 vs. JFS file locations... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Gurus, I was trying to build a super-big kernel with allot of Journaling File System inside it to try out what is best for us to use. Now, I encountered a problem.. It seems like both IBM's JFS and ext3 wants to use fs/jfs .. IMHO that is like asking for problem.. A more logic location for ext3 should be fs/ext3, no? Anyway, just my thought... It might already been discussed for what I know.. BTW.. If you find time to reply on this post, please put me on the Cc: line - I am not on the mailinglist, generates too much mail I have no time to read... Best regards Michael Boman PS I was using 2.2.17 as base for my patches.. DS -- Pager : out of order | On the contrary of what you may Mobile: (+65) 98 55 17 34 | think, your hacker is fully aware eMail : michael.boman@usa.net | of your company's dress code. He ICQ : 5566009 | is fully aware of the fact that it Handle: proxy / 11 Alliance | doesn't help him to do his job. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/