Received: by 2002:ac0:a594:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m20-v6csp5581103imm; Sat, 19 May 2018 05:17:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZrEcwFZG822WpvrpyYv1JzgN0R94sngOtsZgl5Yyd/QUYc9mANo6ZDFQlGFdrjYSWfRGZCe X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:a586:: with SMTP id az6-v6mr13523335plb.210.1526732266438; Sat, 19 May 2018 05:17:46 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1526732266; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=zzLaS8lfAJzG3lygaUqf/9J8yYkRRPAhZiIJtY50jzw4DMy+zwyK58LnRYfHORhkhb BDMRdrSUBb79aPpi0x1nORkkhx30vQM+y7o93p5GhIap7HPvmgpVpzcdARU8hi+kF2XO jyAjfU/1/lmwTkAebidKOUsW/87YE3lEqf6h3bOkCyxp2NJ59ZczoQ9afXPCsqa/q0Bp kFHFOLGbXwmzddrm+Svx+bTLpXamt914HhKfVrHi4P40OuxBVcL07gysqoUqjpLXmBRl bhx6vvEy2VCoryEVdvORmx4yQpw6xwRRwNnQBf5fzAVWOpQM8O10a9aOR+3UQpaFvEc0 dL4w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :message-id:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:date :arc-authentication-results; bh=sD2S22JCOKuvmJrbUXC4rrHXPCkLOyQihfZ+XSgEvzI=; b=kAMEvBAlvg5fhRooHzerymeFuC5sxvcjGMrVw2kBpO67r1ILDGhmQYXcnbdlsm9S7D 6NT82agYZwk6HVf1S75bC6SXltaPBfLnqM8gq/HuasxRvz/cVXOYp6vEYuLwvHPr7CcC 1UM/EbaOTkjmrZh7n63WJknuS4CNW6Yra1+qiho1hPs/qEmCzRKqmiv00K1aiBKfs8Sm EAnPXomV7okE6itB3Sx7WLV9SNs+tTudqChjQi1tpDNOrC1Yg9oHcy/KKb4P0agG7NlS W1eTzuVHEXascfM3dNVxPIg8fHt4rFsB5AWrorXSHEsPVL2vMWWfQxwvhq/yeGecHUB5 ++5Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t23-v6si9291154ply.237.2018.05.19.05.17.32; Sat, 19 May 2018 05:17:46 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752349AbeESMRI (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 19 May 2018 08:17:08 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:55665 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752277AbeESMRG (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 May 2018 08:17:06 -0400 Received: from p4fea4eb5.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([79.234.78.181] helo=nanos.glx-home) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1fK0nE-0000ni-IF; Sat, 19 May 2018 14:17:00 +0200 Date: Sat, 19 May 2018 14:17:00 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Vitaly Kuznetsov cc: KY Srinivasan , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "x86@kernel.org" , Paolo Bonzini , =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Radim_Kr=E8m=E1=F8?= , Roman Kagan , Haiyang Zhang , Stephen Hemminger , "Michael Kelley (EOSG)" , Mohammed Gamal , Cathy Avery , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/8] x86/hyper-v: move struct hv_flush_pcpu{,ex} definitions to common header In-Reply-To: <87d0xuiwx5.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> Message-ID: References: <20180516152131.30689-1-vkuznets@redhat.com> <20180516152131.30689-2-vkuznets@redhat.com> <87d0xuiwx5.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 17 May 2018, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > KY Srinivasan writes: > > We should coordinate on this; I have patches in flight that conflict with > > the changes here. > > I see you also fixed 'HV_GENERIC_SET_SPARCE_4K' typo. I don't think it's > a big deal as we fix it in the same way :-) > > I see you also altered hv_flush_pcpu_ex definition but kept it in mmu.c: > I think my patches should be applied on top of yours, I only need to > move it to hyperv-tlfs.h header and get rid of _pcpu suffix. > > I hope Thomas will merge your patches very soon. In case Paolo/Radim > decide that my series is ready too we'll ask their guidance on how to > resolve the conflict (topic branch?). It should be relatively easy. I've applied KY's series to tip/x86/hyperv. It has no other changes in there. So it could be pulled into KVM if necessary w/o pulling other stuff. Thanks, tglx