Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262052AbTHaOoo (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Aug 2003 10:44:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262084AbTHaOoo (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Aug 2003 10:44:44 -0400 Received: from ppp-217-133-42-200.cust-adsl.tiscali.it ([217.133.42.200]:19664 "EHLO dualathlon.random") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262052AbTHaOon (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Aug 2003 10:44:43 -0400 Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 16:45:05 +0200 From: Andrea Arcangeli To: Alan Cox Cc: Larry McVoy , Pascal Schmidt , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: bandwidth for bkbits.net (good news) Message-ID: <20030831144505.GS24409@dualathlon.random> References: <20030830230701.GA25845@work.bitmover.com> <20030831013928.GN24409@dualathlon.random> <20030831025659.GA18767@work.bitmover.com> <1062335711.31351.44.camel@dhcp23.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1062335711.31351.44.camel@dhcp23.swansea.linux.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-GPG-Key: 1024D/68B9CB43 13D9 8355 295F 4823 7C49 C012 DFA1 686E 68B9 CB43 X-PGP-Key: 1024R/CB4660B9 CC A0 71 81 F4 A0 63 AC C0 4B 81 1D 8C 15 C8 E5 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1585 Lines: 33 On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 02:15:12PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > On Sul, 2003-08-31 at 03:56, Larry McVoy wrote: > > I'm pretty convinced we can't solve the problem at our end. Maybe we can > > For bursts of traffic you can't. what's the difference of rejecting packets in software, or because the link can't handle them? Assume the guaranteed bandwidth is much lower than what the link can provide (very common here during the day), the isp will have to do the software thing anyways to balance the bandwidth across the different ip. it works flawlessy for me and it's the same problem (I also use streaming services), and they're unusable until I turn the shaping on, I'm sure that if you use the script and you change 1kbyte/sec to everything but voip it'll work fine for you too, since basically everything else won't pass anymore, it will take ages to open an html page and all the bkbits.net users will hang, and the link will be idle 99% of the time, so voip will take it over as much as it can. I don't think it's a matter of "if it works or not", I think it's a matter of how much you're ok to lose in terms of global bandwith for all the other services but voip. the only annoying problem I run into, is that tc is missing a flush operation (like iptables -F) but I never need to tweak it anymore so I don't mind too much. Andrea - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/