Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262342AbTHaQS2 (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Aug 2003 12:18:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262347AbTHaQS2 (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Aug 2003 12:18:28 -0400 Received: from smtp.bitmover.com ([192.132.92.12]:61640 "EHLO smtp.bitmover.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262342AbTHaQS1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Aug 2003 12:18:27 -0400 Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 09:18:18 -0700 From: Larry McVoy To: Dan Kegel Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz , GCC Mailing List , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: LMbench as gcc performance regression test? Message-ID: <20030831161818.GB18767@work.bitmover.com> Mail-Followup-To: Larry McVoy , Dan Kegel , Daniel Jacobowitz , GCC Mailing List , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <3F51A201.8090108@kegel.com> <20030831152449.GA6893@nevyn.them.org> <3F521B4E.10909@kegel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3F521B4E.10909@kegel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin (score=0.5, required 7, AWL, DATE_IN_PAST_06_12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 674 Lines: 15 On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 08:59:10AM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote: > I need to make sure that moving to a newer compiler for our kernel > will cause no performance regressions. Perhaps people think that you mean to compile LMbench w/ different GCC's and maybe what you really mean is compile the same kernel with different GCC's and measure that. -- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/