Received: by 2002:ac0:a594:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m20-v6csp249987imm; Mon, 21 May 2018 05:35:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZqU7R4oKHmy+VBWXY/mQBHV3TePKY5hH7LyLAuo6zJNVqWhA3iSV+AdmXk2bO/FuhZZ12DG X-Received: by 2002:a62:3745:: with SMTP id e66-v6mr19847791pfa.43.1526906141230; Mon, 21 May 2018 05:35:41 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1526906141; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=exvYeztsJAoBizkU9wXBf4ntZ1ezyxfH6HoAQlS33lttcYtPIAk3AnyiHSnG/f31UM bIry/biyI9gU24+Bf2mZ/GxPdvmpv2H5vKiY9NWS/TaEfeXAVbWmP6xuldUwgIgol16c HzsLBjwS7hnRTgprkz+1cyvhS6IJ+IefEn8B7qy/CPULBSDxiqjQ+goFLldQhdl4j5oy iThHZf5dsnc9mIYs9RNOa2JR3vb91Wz6mWjWWtv2Iovc3+FQqRuxzF3+5qkYFs7t+Rx/ D5qbtSvSoK64NOmJU6U/miJzSq/SNXdceR+4so5LbJUEj/Ma6apfJz5+Ibe/zSc1pnda 8dxQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-language:thread-index :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject :in-reply-to:references:cc:to:from:dmarc-filter:dkim-signature :dkim-signature:arc-authentication-results; bh=Q9sVuVBzseO2Z9NfN6zWSvIyQIZvrR3QB/Rg4hPJxVM=; b=a2cWr5WIBFq6c2DqWRGzvwNF+aBDW2mcJXaIEHatxMp+CQjUr1Sijprr0Wnp3bem/L r9HLBmk36lzVgvThTwUR/o5WoU9JgopRbO6JjU1DXHaXBeGLRpuaALmBqYphq1IoAJqw gaOtFYsMMM8jdVaLJCfv7guJ2QA6ju8NuDJHf4RkOJNlkyTlqBnmYPRcziBvhqL+vMoX RS/VpFCW05w2lCLfiX9qmHFxlLMofNsq5GvxIPA7wxGdgWqyU6xMTnokTUD26m3pnt8D WVzyrOkq1nF2lABhD7FCy9AEbKDFhQFY98kADOHx08m4NuNZUilK6ZCjdS0SwIpPZYkn dp/g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@codeaurora.org header.s=default header.b=PuEoqf1U; dkim=pass header.i=@codeaurora.org header.s=default header.b=PuEoqf1U; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t23-v6si13674473ply.237.2018.05.21.05.35.26; Mon, 21 May 2018 05:35:41 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@codeaurora.org header.s=default header.b=PuEoqf1U; dkim=pass header.i=@codeaurora.org header.s=default header.b=PuEoqf1U; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752654AbeEUMfQ (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 21 May 2018 08:35:16 -0400 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:57976 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751109AbeEUMfN (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 May 2018 08:35:13 -0400 Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E3C6460274; Mon, 21 May 2018 12:35:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1526906112; bh=I3RafyRC+hq/2kcdYKlNxFmyn4+TsQpDUoRWiXLSzq0=; h=From:To:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:From; b=PuEoqf1UI+QJADGih53/OKyYmWhfWQ5rrXzJQHEQ4DujB0BQIUgVtKRe6zO/O70ub ItJFukHGpD17g1H+r6ebHRiHUT0+vXpfa0DwVs51UvgWf1we9jGhIzETX7pdssW9Zi 7EulTlZBbeIBZaOlWkbrL1aG78yqDV7BUGkFMzyI= X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=2.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from ilial (unknown [185.23.60.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ilialin@codeaurora.org) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E290860131; Mon, 21 May 2018 12:35:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1526906112; bh=I3RafyRC+hq/2kcdYKlNxFmyn4+TsQpDUoRWiXLSzq0=; h=From:To:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:From; b=PuEoqf1UI+QJADGih53/OKyYmWhfWQ5rrXzJQHEQ4DujB0BQIUgVtKRe6zO/O70ub ItJFukHGpD17g1H+r6ebHRiHUT0+vXpfa0DwVs51UvgWf1we9jGhIzETX7pdssW9Zi 7EulTlZBbeIBZaOlWkbrL1aG78yqDV7BUGkFMzyI= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org E290860131 Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=ilialin@codeaurora.org From: To: "'Russell King - ARM Linux'" Cc: , , , , , , , References: <1526555955-29960-11-git-send-email-ilialin@codeaurora.org> <1526898690-4018-1-git-send-email-ilialin@codeaurora.org> <20180521105428.GM17671@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> <000b01d3f0f3$aa961cc0$ffc25640$@codeaurora.org> <20180521121140.GO17671@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20180521121140.GO17671@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> Subject: RE: [PATCH] cpufreq: Add Kryo CPU scaling driver Date: Mon, 21 May 2018 15:35:07 +0300 Message-ID: <000d01d3f100$294247e0$7bc6d7a0$@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0 Thread-Index: AQF4oTaoNxz6XIk2qh8MCLQUCquwggKwu+X3AuWN43cB2ygHZQHn9PLypKXxQQA= Content-Language: en-us Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org There are 2 CPU clusters in the Kryo, CPU 0 and 1 are called Silver Cluster and CPU 2 and 3 - Gold Cluster. Each cluster has single clock. The clusters differ in terms of speed capabilities, computing power and power consumption. Therefore, I define separate OPP table for each cluster, and my driver will choose the appropriate OPP subset for each cluster. Lead refers to first CPU in the cluster. > -----Original Message----- > From: Russell King - ARM Linux > Sent: Monday, May 21, 2018 15:12 > To: ilialin@codeaurora.org > Cc: viresh.kumar@linaro.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux- > pm@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org; linux- > kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-soc@vger.kernel.org; linux- > clk@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Add Kryo CPU scaling driver > > On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 02:05:41PM +0300, ilialin@codeaurora.org wrote: > > You are right. > > cpu_dev_silver != cpu_dev_gold, and I found this with my tests as well. > > Thank you. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Russell King - ARM Linux > > > Sent: Monday, May 21, 2018 13:54 > > > To: Ilia Lin > > > Cc: viresh.kumar@linaro.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux- > > > pm@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org; linux- > > > kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-soc@vger.kernel.org; linux- > > > clk@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Add Kryo CPU scaling driver > > > > > > On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 01:31:30PM +0300, Ilia Lin wrote: > > > > +#define SILVER_LEAD 0 > > > > +#define GOLD_LEAD 2 > > > > > > Okay, two different values here, but "GOLD_LEAD" appears unused. > > > > > > > + cpu_dev_silver = get_cpu_device(SILVER_LEAD); > > > > + if (NULL == cpu_dev_silver) > > > > + return -ENODEV; > > > > + > > > > + cpu_dev_gold = get_cpu_device(SILVER_LEAD); > > > > + if (NULL == cpu_dev_gold) > > > > + return -ENODEV; > > > > > > get_cpu_device() takes the logical CPU number. So the above gets > > > CPU 0 each time, and so cpu_dev_silver == cpu_dev_gold here. So > > > what's the point of the second get_cpu_device() ? If it's supposed to be: > > > > > > cpu_dev_gold = get_cpu_device(GOLD_LEAD); > > > > > > That would get CPU 2, but in terms of these defines, it doesn't make > > > that much sense. What exactly does "silver lead" and "gold lead" > > > refer to in > > these > > > definitions? > > I think you still need to explain this. > > -- > RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ > FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 8.8Mbps down 630kbps > up According to speedtest.net: 8.21Mbps down 510kbps up