Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263097AbTIAAhw (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Aug 2003 20:37:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263113AbTIAAhw (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Aug 2003 20:37:52 -0400 Received: from mail.jlokier.co.uk ([81.29.64.88]:21897 "EHLO mail.jlokier.co.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263097AbTIAAhv (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Aug 2003 20:37:51 -0400 Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2003 01:37:50 +0100 From: Jamie Lokier To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: x86, ARM, PARISC, PPC, MIPS and Sparc folks please run this Message-ID: <20030901003750.GB31531@mail.jlokier.co.uk> References: <20030829053510.GA12663@mail.jlokier.co.uk> <20030901002412.GA16537@linux-sh.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030901002412.GA16537@linux-sh.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 544 Lines: 16 Paul Mundt wrote: > sh (VIPT cache): > > Test separation: 4096 bytes: FAIL - cache not coherent > Test separation: 8192 bytes: FAIL - cache not coherent > Test separation: 16384 bytes: pass A VIVT cache can do that, but I think a VIPT cache should always be coherent. Do I misunderstand? -- Jamie - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/