Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262618AbTIAGD7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Sep 2003 02:03:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262622AbTIAGD7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Sep 2003 02:03:59 -0400 Received: from nat-pool-bos.redhat.com ([66.187.230.200]:11376 "EHLO chimarrao.boston.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262618AbTIAGD6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Sep 2003 02:03:58 -0400 Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2003 02:03:55 -0400 (EDT) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@chimarrao.boston.redhat.com To: Dan Kegel cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Subject: Re: Andrea VM changes In-Reply-To: <3F529A95.4030509@kegel.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1055 Lines: 26 On Sun, 31 Aug 2003, Dan Kegel wrote: > Jamie Lokier wrote: > > I'd love to be able to select which app _doesn't_ deserve the axe. > > I.e. not sshd, and then not httpd. > > I tried adding a hinting system that let the user > tweak the badness calculated by the OOM killer. > Didn't help. No matter how I tried to protect > important processes, there was always a case where > the OOM killer ended up killing them anyway. Indeed. You can't have completely fool-proof heuristics. Then again, a heuristic is often better than killing syslogd at the first hint of trouble. -- "Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/