Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 22 May 2018 16:02:33 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
Cc:     open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, patches@kernelci.org,
        lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org,
        Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk>,
        linux- stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.16 000/110] 4.16.11-stable review
Message-ID: <20180522140233.GB7374@kroah.com>
References: <20180521210503.823249477@linuxfoundation.org>
 <CA+G9fYsGV7P77u8z0jhGrpMDFSMo-1PBnHPWkq4z1Z7oq6vEaw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <CA+G9fYsGV7P77u8z0jhGrpMDFSMo-1PBnHPWkq4z1Z7oq6vEaw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.0 (2018-05-17)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 04:18:31PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On 22 May 2018 at 02:40, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.16.11 release.
> > There are 110 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Tue May 22 21:04:14 UTC 2018.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.16.11-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.16.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
> 
> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> No regressions on arm64, arm and x86_64.
> 
> NOTE:
> kselftest rtnetlink.sh test case failed on all devices.
> Which is not a regression which used to SKIP pass and now run and fail.
> Bug reported to investigate,
> https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3834

Thanks for the quick turn around for testing all of these and letting me
know.

greg k-h