Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] block: Create scsi_sense.h for SCSI and ATAPI
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc:     Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
        James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        "Manoj N. Kumar" <manoj@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        "Matthew R. Ochs" <mrochs@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Uma Krishnan <ukrishn@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20180522181512.39316-1-keescook@chromium.org>
 <20180522181512.39316-4-keescook@chromium.org>
 <20180522183613.GA3784@infradead.org> <yq1efi3bk3g.fsf@oracle.com>
 <CAGXu5jJ0Sice+fdpWgzBhQR=NGz-DT9qmYVdV1GeH73_q9pbmw@mail.gmail.com>
 <732f4249-5681-4a54-ec21-4ecc3d3a74e5@kernel.dk>
 <20180522191309.GA23615@infradead.org>
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Message-ID: <8d4af5c4-96fa-54ee-d5c1-b887b1de5a3c@kernel.dk>
Date:   Tue, 22 May 2018 13:16:54 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20180522191309.GA23615@infradead.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 5/22/18 1:13 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 01:09:41PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> I think Martin and Christoph are objecting to moving the code to
>> block/scsi_ioctl.h. I don't care too much about where the code is, but
>> think it would be nice to have the definitions in a separate header. But
>> if they prefer just pulling in all of SCSI for it, well then I guess
>> it's pointless to move the header bits. Seems very heavy handed to me,
>> though.
> 
> It might be heavy handed for the 3 remaining users of drivers/ide,

Brutal :-)

> but as long as that stuff just keeps working I'd rather worry about
> everyone else, and keep the scsi code where it belongs.

Fine with me then, hopefully we can some day kill it off.

-- 
Jens Axboe