Received: by 2002:ac0:a594:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m20-v6csp1982045imm; Tue, 22 May 2018 12:36:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZokCb+e/Qz31BFyy0cQtSH4k1HoPyPbAgHHSSZuSUhBmyOpr0JMwICpwo/jthUE9MvsxBDI X-Received: by 2002:a63:79ca:: with SMTP id u193-v6mr5439194pgc.112.1527017779664; Tue, 22 May 2018 12:36:19 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1527017779; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=aU3j1jxSOF17KliCgJWERUoKRQrC+ly2Or1JSDBRPu6ZcdPS0beMeF2tIQJ9xGlUsm dKl1CaSzST3YFrNaxzZF9c2PvB1NswJOGtBqx+L4hnbjo6zxQScxwtIw4iMstiBpJNh1 WRrbk7xs+vsucP8JR/WQUt5Ro3rMzqryuVxQfMnE6LK3af8X0y4ci3ekbPMV6xH+EJ0B lqUJmrrC7A5Hkg94MOZvtEFAe2HcWLG6VAC7ud7KrIzN9Tlz7LTjamHroCxyNavXKhM4 NOoKOPqJgbe7IO4Ca+dffcac5L0DBiahaJORGXJjoXUK3kvs4krFSf+3GHbomxPljCNv 4oGA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:references:in-reply-to:references :in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :arc-authentication-results; bh=C25aPMVPEGH9l3vlu6ZfHCDc6l0D5q+6tS2O9dyKT+k=; b=qCG5Nc2rtK+G5SBtpYUTB7KYZiF4AXko4QBUePuR9stM1cWZ6o1cI/WMgz/YCA9pLm HAapGKZxbYaDqpqBHUZNb05faui31pzPiyI4nY/4gz2a3/yGu0gkJkvf21KsKuHWnJg/ gH09+5EET4eT16esNPwAsKzWpl+tC9e/ijxNvJ9Md5D+vFS+CKaH7HiGBGnRmlz5w+5j joV5zumJPgPdPMEkzpYxeBdkSclcQOD8/ioVoWODl4J9yWi7PhTtWHOzCJkoFtwnOKUz q4ArdbQ1rgAWU+CZEWNZduk/r8TI6Ugo8SQEBW0n8NSiIUmzZiaTMUhk4lBjUBB+iOgS 4PjA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y8-v6si13266400pgp.527.2018.05.22.12.36.04; Tue, 22 May 2018 12:36:19 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752835AbeEVTey (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 22 May 2018 15:34:54 -0400 Received: from mga07.intel.com ([134.134.136.100]:16706 "EHLO mga07.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752406AbeEVTcF (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 May 2018 15:32:05 -0400 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 May 2018 12:32:00 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.49,430,1520924400"; d="scan'208";a="226406417" Received: from rchatre-s.jf.intel.com ([10.54.70.76]) by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 22 May 2018 12:32:00 -0700 From: Reinette Chatre To: tglx@linutronix.de, fenghua.yu@intel.com, tony.luck@intel.com, vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com Cc: gavin.hindman@intel.com, jithu.joseph@intel.com, dave.hansen@intel.com, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Reinette Chatre Subject: [PATCH V4 27/38] x86/intel_rdt: Add utilities to test pseudo-locked region possibility Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 04:29:15 -0700 Message-Id: <55867a6b4c403e0af61eec032cad669b9c12cced.1526987654.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.13.6 In-Reply-To: References: In-Reply-To: References: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org A pseudo-locked region does not have a class of service associated with it and thus not tracked in the array of control values maintained as part of the domain. Even so, when the user provides a new bitmask for another resource group it needs to be checked for interference with existing pseudo-locked regions. Additionally only one pseudo-locked region can be created in any cache hierarchy. Introduce two utilities in support of above scenarios: (1) a utility that can be used to test if a given capacity bitmask overlaps with any pseudo-locked regions associated with a particular cache instance, (2) a utility that can be used to test if a pseudo-locked region exists within a particular cache hierarchy. Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt.h | 2 ++ arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_pseudo_lock.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 57 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt.h index 12b006178d3a..119645c83e27 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt.h +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt.h @@ -503,6 +503,8 @@ enum rdtgrp_mode rdtgroup_mode_by_closid(int closid); int rdtgroup_tasks_assigned(struct rdtgroup *r); int rdtgroup_locksetup_enter(struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp); int rdtgroup_locksetup_exit(struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp); +bool rdtgroup_cbm_overlaps_pseudo_locked(struct rdt_domain *d, u32 _cbm); +bool rdtgroup_pseudo_locked_in_hierarchy(struct rdt_domain *d); struct rdt_domain *get_domain_from_cpu(int cpu, struct rdt_resource *r); int update_domains(struct rdt_resource *r, int closid); void closid_free(int closid); diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_pseudo_lock.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_pseudo_lock.c index ce8243c87877..0d2177a0bc60 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_pseudo_lock.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_pseudo_lock.c @@ -299,3 +299,58 @@ int rdtgroup_locksetup_exit(struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp) pseudo_lock_free(rdtgrp); return 0; } + +/** + * rdtgroup_cbm_overlaps_pseudo_locked - Test if CBM or portion is pseudo-locked + * @d: RDT domain + * @_cbm: CBM to test + * + * @d represents a cache instance and @_cbm a capacity bitmask that is + * considered for it. Determine if @_cbm overlaps with any existing + * pseudo-locked region on @d. + * + * Return: true if @_cbm overlaps with pseudo-locked region on @d, false + * otherwise. + */ +bool rdtgroup_cbm_overlaps_pseudo_locked(struct rdt_domain *d, u32 _cbm) +{ + unsigned long *cbm = (unsigned long *)&_cbm; + unsigned long *cbm_b; + unsigned int cbm_len; + + if (d->plr) { + cbm_len = d->plr->r->cache.cbm_len; + cbm_b = (unsigned long *)&d->plr->cbm; + if (bitmap_intersects(cbm, cbm_b, cbm_len)) + return true; + } + + return false; +} + +/** + * rdtgroup_pseudo_locked_in_hierarchy - Pseudo-locked region in cache hierarchy + * @d: RDT domain under test + * + * The setup of a pseudo-locked region affects all cache instances within + * the hierarchy of the region. It is thus essential to know if any + * pseudo-locked regions exist within a cache hierarchy to prevent any + * attempts to create new pseudo-locked regions in the same hierarchy. + * + * Return: true if a pseudo-locked region exists in the hierarchy of @d, + * false otherwise. + */ +bool rdtgroup_pseudo_locked_in_hierarchy(struct rdt_domain *d) +{ + struct rdt_resource *r; + struct rdt_domain *d_i; + + for_each_alloc_enabled_rdt_resource(r) { + list_for_each_entry(d_i, &r->domains, list) { + if (d_i != d && + cpumask_intersects(&d_i->cpu_mask, &d->cpu_mask)) + return true; + } + } + return false; +} -- 2.13.6