Received: by 2002:ac0:a594:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m20-v6csp107574imm; Tue, 22 May 2018 14:58:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZrflv4n/jMSvwF0VJfQMjKlFjtGwM2i30GeKqsgG/ynCWLkelPdqyPaR0FDKw1vn9V3rQL0 X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:5304:: with SMTP id b4-v6mr200463pli.231.1527026289886; Tue, 22 May 2018 14:58:09 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1527026289; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=xurqzQ4HUnWk09dzjIMyO9p7V1+05rxuN5GnTt+rpGvobtx1zZ4mjhCBW+v/6RJCLU 2K6E4AaYJ0x7OhX6JaxjyaYDVzLqthbMt5C+4NOvkFUZcFgl2V7Zo8i6BF+NK2ewHFBf /V8ZNKSNL5BKsZaZjWjbc4M/sV28PG/+4KbGf+qgv8bsQ5vYoldjWhN7ryYtkGLUzexR aWggZwbGKVao/f/MzPyAkiDiFYTf8PIYmdOY8oH4s41Viti2oPCxRzsDbusnU2Qo+wFS x6wD3jduvJIjeFEDbk8F39MW31l8EonAUDVFdeZSQVQCHJGfbzTNCCpNJEF3ud4OHzxY +Oeg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:arc-authentication-results; bh=h3Upj0weFliEdZHmodUPVYH77f4kYeDngLrpIs+Dunk=; b=vi6hHlVkxRivUE9dfGk52YCwIKHKun4ubf8rEE3kG8Wdg2+zP9oBjzc3u16k4ffeiL WFzM+BX9a8CswA+7LUpjIh9k/nuzyqI2fuomIkkTqnvI+m+6PuyF9FZUSnFrktHZJ2J9 lA23L30+0uGKJIKLXZ29PXsCKxBRtH2fy8oljJgXnySU99VCuX3PAXfimra//0YvOeo6 qEPIdMIPTLthfG1AKyiIqq+G0MiS5p7xL1WGT3TLgykxifRagqko07nKw11Md2uKbvVi xdmG/toJBs6qrIzY0x63yZjLXH/FWb5Z3IuZ6OOEW7TzOSDJ0gt31rhp1ZzP6mf1zw6F sNTg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y25-v6si16476790pfn.248.2018.05.22.14.57.55; Tue, 22 May 2018 14:58:09 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753170AbeEVV4n (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 22 May 2018 17:56:43 -0400 Received: from emh06.mail.saunalahti.fi ([62.142.5.116]:47284 "EHLO emh06.mail.saunalahti.fi" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753137AbeEVV4l (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 May 2018 17:56:41 -0400 Received: from darkstar.musicnaut.iki.fi (85-76-96-92-nat.elisa-mobile.fi [85.76.96.92]) by emh06.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA3E330071; Wed, 23 May 2018 00:56:38 +0300 (EEST) Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 00:56:38 +0300 From: Aaro Koskinen To: Pavel Machek Cc: Pali =?iso-8859-1?Q?Roh=E1r?= , sre@kernel.org, kernel list , linux-arm-kernel , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, tony@atomide.com, khilman@kernel.org, ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com, patrikbachan@gmail.com, serge@hallyn.com, abcloriens@gmail.com, clayton@craftyguy.net, martijn@brixit.nl, sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com, Filip =?utf-8?Q?Matijevi=C4=87?= , Thorsten Leemhuis Subject: Re: v4.17-rc1: regressions on N900, N950 Message-ID: <20180522215638.GC2299@darkstar.musicnaut.iki.fi> References: <20180422074213.GA12428@amd> <20180423202940.ig6iud5lrbgnu35a@darkstar.musicnaut.iki.fi> <20180521213952.GA11596@amd> <20180522080250.4fzyvqrgw5oigexn@pali> <20180522194139.GB2299@darkstar.musicnaut.iki.fi> <20180522205824.GA24927@amd> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180522205824.GA24927@amd> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 10:58:26PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Tue 2018-05-22 22:41:39, Aaro Koskinen wrote: > > My device worked with v4.17-rc1 (haven't found time to test newer kernels), > > but if you say the probe order is random then we must find some proper way > > to express the dependency. > > I started bisect, but.. that will probably not be useful. > > If your device works ok in v4.17-rc1, it probably works in newer -rcs, > too. Actually, my statement may be bogus... Now I tried again with -rc1 (and also -rc6) and it fails... But v4.16 works. > Thanks for the ordering hint, I'll try to figure out what is going on > there. My bisection pointed to 6fa7324ac5489ad43c4b6351355b869bc5458bef which doesn't seem to make any sense...?! So maybe there really is something random stuff going on? :-( A.