Subject: Re: bitkeeper comments
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
       Albert Cahalan <albert@users.sourceforge.net>,
       Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, ak@suse.de
In-Reply-To: <20030901155915.GC1327@work.bitmover.com>
References: <1062389729.314.31.camel@cube>
	 <20030901140706.GG18458@work.bitmover.com> <1062430014.314.59.camel@cube>
	 <20030901154646.GB1327@work.bitmover.com>
	 <20030901165658.A24661@infradead.org>
	 <20030901155915.GC1327@work.bitmover.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <1062434020.14183.13.camel@dhcp23.swansea.linux.org.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2003 17:33:40 +0100
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 871
Lines: 16

On Llu, 2003-09-01 at 16:59, Larry McVoy wrote:
> Hey, I'm not in the middle of this because I don't understand who is right
> and it's not my place to make that call.  I said "if Linus or Marcelo says
> do it"  specifically for the case that there is some hanky panky going on.
> On the other hand, it's perfectly possible that the wrong comment got 
> stuck in there and if that's the case why shouldn't it get fixed?

Presumably in the abstract "if you care" case you can generate this
change globally by excluding that changeset and all after, then
reapplying it with a different comment then reapplying all that follow ?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/