Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 23 May 2018 18:39:37 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc:     Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
        Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>,
        Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com>,
        Eugene Korenevsky <ekorenevsky@gmail.com>,
        Peter Chen <peter.chen@nxp.com>,
        Daniel Drake <drake@endlessm.com>,
        Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>, Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>,
        Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, groeck@chromium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: hub: Per-port setting to use old enumeration scheme
Message-ID: <20180523163936.GE12456@kroah.com>
References: <20180523021656.122455-1-drinkcat@chromium.org>
 <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1805230958590.1481-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1805230958590.1481-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.0 (2018-05-17)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 10:03:55AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Wed, 23 May 2018, Nicolas Boichat wrote:
> 
> > The "old" enumeration scheme is considerably faster (it takes
> > ~294ms instead of ~439ms to get the descriptor).
> > 
> > It is currently only possible to use the old scheme globally
> > (/sys/module/usbcore/parameters/old_scheme_first), which is not
> > desirable as the new scheme was introduced to increase compatibility
> > with more devices.
> > 
> > However, in our case, we care about time-to-active for a specific
> > USB device (which we make the firmware for), on a specific port
> > (that is pogo-pin based: not a standard USB port). This new
> > sysfs option makes it possible to use the old scheme on a single
> > port only.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>
> > ---
> > 
> > There are other "quirks" that we could add to reduce further
> > enumeration time (e.g. reduce USB debounce time, reduce TRSTRCY
> > to 10ms instead of 50ms as used currently), but the logic is quite
> > similar, so it'd be good to have this reviewed first.
> 
> I'm not opposed to the idea in principle, although I don't like your
> implementation because it breaks the original old_scheme_first
> parameter.
> 
> Let's see what some other people think.
> 
> Yours is a rather special case, because you know exactly what device
> will be attached to a specific port.  Still, I can see that sort of
> thing happening in constrained and special-purpose settings.
> 
> How do you arrange to set the new quirk before the device is 
> discovered?

Yeah, this last question is what I had when looking at this.  Or does it
not matter at first boot and only matters for wake-up?

thanks,

greg k-h