Received: by 2002:ac0:a594:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m20-v6csp1137559imm; Wed, 23 May 2018 10:52:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZpIbDYgnQQ2wGk6yp3rSM0r1kUuj0vX4px0s+ndrvAx2MSN8ta7unMvlIvoO+Q8Q3a6CQsK X-Received: by 2002:a62:de02:: with SMTP id h2-v6mr3808353pfg.205.1527097942073; Wed, 23 May 2018 10:52:22 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1527097942; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=IM/M/ecjpWuksLYxMiIYmsOqC9y4uUC52HMill0I4+WpiTvUmXZLwLsE0RvhShPAK8 nrvXWWJuDLBo85ThDA6BwdFiNDqGD4Yziw5zVxKGfOMXMn773oxyidCk2KlsgY6CXqoF jmGOtxMZdr4g1ynjsR+Xy27N9bdSiLP+XKgMwnNOcX+6dzt2pAXB8c2/lBGddNPEXkgr HV8dluRFS/LkK6IDgYvBbKgACT7IBBnGXlBMcNGnV5zgkypMJ2OrpnXyvJgO9tiM82x2 qxbBu30BHy4DuzLV+26i/9/Zu2wxsr1KX8+KQMhelF0oQMvuHbJv5l7Bex+Asick7iI1 DKiQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:arc-authentication-results; bh=rJw7d020swqSVZPqrWT5Z6sKfKfbQ5ihx9IYM3AlynA=; b=ERGoJeGNv6/2wpezfeLDx7kapobvqO+DF1n1EnQdZq/UmiJ7xtsFnkxa7SW46P5KiQ FWZP7rtPHaPpLLvdq5bvHs7DwB+YCzCupQkr9PhxUS3dse1zT+gTQy1E41Qg4QaHmZ4t ACPSGBF2E/8ivXVgkM73st95BLdVjNaT2GXkKzIHdEwtRYZu7M7JvAo7gcDsdupMofOI 89qYGYJy7bKd2O1kHJsI9LZCGuXxOLgaY1Ekbhygvdbo91wf4EWoHUoqe/ggQ/LWh3dt bT2hOFcopHVykKAWV4EXVN3tXqIKZWx98K4iXlHIjQA5d0eA3WFqN0rDoT7PnEDGHmHj BbOg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 1-v6si18392477plr.483.2018.05.23.10.52.06; Wed, 23 May 2018 10:52:22 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933144AbeEWRv5 (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 23 May 2018 13:51:57 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:50194 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751685AbeEWRv4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 May 2018 13:51:56 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay1.suse.de (charybdis-ext.suse.de [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55379AEEB; Wed, 23 May 2018 17:51:55 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 10:35:31 -0700 From: Davidlohr Bueso To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org Cc: manfred@colorfullife.com, guillaume.knispel@supersonicimagine.com, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: semantics of rhashtable and sysvipc Message-ID: <20180523173531.q7qxm62dkw256nbk@linux-n805> References: <20180523172500.anfvmjtumww65ief@linux-n805> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180523172500.anfvmjtumww65ief@linux-n805> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170421 (1.8.2) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 23 May 2018, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: >I see two possible fixes. I guess a third option would be to make the hashtable static, but I'm not against using rhashtables so I'm not really considering this.