Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 23 May 2018 11:51:43 -0700
From:   Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bdi: Move cgroup bdi_writeback to a dedicated low
 concurrency workqueue
Message-ID: <20180523185143.GS1718769@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com>
References: <20180523175632.GO1718769@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com>
 <20180523183907.GZ3803@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180523183907.GZ3803@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 11:39:07AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > While this resolves the problem at hand, it might be a good idea to
> > isolate rcu_exp_work to its own workqueue too as it can be used from
> > various paths and is prone to this sort of indirect A-A deadlocks.
> 
> Commit ad7c946b35ad4 ("rcu: Create RCU-specific workqueues with rescuers")
> was accepted into mainline this past merge window.  Does that do what
> you want, or are you looking for something else?

Ah, that does it.  Sorry, was looking at an older kernel.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun