Received: by 2002:ac0:a594:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m20-v6csp1225138imm; Wed, 23 May 2018 12:21:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZr8L76PutWvifbXF21NgRiAy5BHB9aTLR1txitzOepgBrcUHhSs0MO83vYnbWs6y+NiOXDF X-Received: by 2002:a62:d717:: with SMTP id b23-v6mr4034764pfh.5.1527103311357; Wed, 23 May 2018 12:21:51 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1527103311; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=r2MkRqyWnkWnHcNuW3qJWXpXsiOV1x7PAPPBhQCwcEpEVOxDHNECCJ8UCSEPhtOjJ1 chml9J5hc10bQljIy+axEM7dDFrj+IHWXLoQYVE4OF34qFFj3mW7zALhRxj2BrWthUc1 0E8kzGWC5bdSGXYgQw8eFRQKtkV5LtQnj/7vyZnxJwVh/cvlnjU50kx1JZ0P6P7dLHGD vr7WmJa9DZCLgBaIut4KDKgkhL9IqkCZrEnGVGxeaoqJttC7RGa6UBoBvvBWsKzSDz1E qpVGyZ1SATxyFoq+GiC4E+K/5F+NyyRIuvlRHSVISuy5Y5fyrUdA0/BDejg+A1iwl5jv HF/Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:cc:to :from:date:arc-authentication-results; bh=kXlcMXmMVndr95/7t5Juc3wgYkq7CL+sWnpjDagNtrQ=; b=FQmAiIjS37p9cdMrKUcR7MA84B4knD/b66dEH9Vu0/LiV5mru8n4uNaCF/JkAHPg+d XpCeHStunEw9150IRh4kT2Vet1WbChblg+uNayQH+A7rA/5tKC66hdgpLigpvvlrZxXw SKoWDeRjjZpAR1nmMsb06kHIMlC0L9V0IDtS8/o6wuK9/L0mWN66pLrvQ3WMRAR4gl/e JdEabZBRJxxN3ejhEd5GrU9Qav6hsGbNq4A7bpfq8EEDbXQaV/WmNIXmv0fqpKBdgvPF 9ku3toDupzo+NHv1D3iah54KO9nLckTmnnKCxcIlbM+m/SGq1KxZxG5qEy6yxFdSJZSH yELw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v6-v6si20151558plp.60.2018.05.23.12.21.36; Wed, 23 May 2018 12:21:51 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934246AbeEWTU1 (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 23 May 2018 15:20:27 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:37124 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934090AbeEWTUZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 May 2018 15:20:25 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098394.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w4NJDv71088230 for ; Wed, 23 May 2018 15:20:25 -0400 Received: from e32.co.us.ibm.com (e32.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.150]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2j5b80gy03-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 23 May 2018 15:20:25 -0400 Received: from localhost by e32.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 23 May 2018 13:20:24 -0600 Received: from b01cxnp22034.gho.pok.ibm.com (9.57.198.24) by e32.co.us.ibm.com (192.168.1.132) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Wed, 23 May 2018 13:20:22 -0600 Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.108]) by b01cxnp22034.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w4NJ959V5112292 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 23 May 2018 19:09:05 GMT Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 608DCB2066; Wed, 23 May 2018 16:10:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42DCEB205F; Wed, 23 May 2018 16:10:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from paulmck-ThinkPad-W541 (unknown [9.70.82.108]) by b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 May 2018 16:10:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: by paulmck-ThinkPad-W541 (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 587D716C5DD3; Wed, 23 May 2018 12:10:44 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 12:10:44 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: Tejun Heo Cc: Jens Axboe , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kara , Andrew Morton , kernel-team@fb.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] bdi: Move cgroup bdi_writeback to a dedicated low concurrency workqueue Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <20180523175632.GO1718769@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> <20180523183907.GZ3803@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20180523185143.GS1718769@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180523185143.GS1718769@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18052319-0004-0000-0000-000014255D95 X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00009073; HX=3.00000241; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000261; SDB=6.01036619; UDB=6.00530319; IPR=6.00815747; MB=3.00021262; MTD=3.00000008; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2018-05-23 19:20:24 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18052319-0005-0000-0000-000087567014 Message-Id: <20180523191044.GC3803@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2018-05-23_07:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1709140000 definitions=main-1805230188 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 11:51:43AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 11:39:07AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > While this resolves the problem at hand, it might be a good idea to > > > isolate rcu_exp_work to its own workqueue too as it can be used from > > > various paths and is prone to this sort of indirect A-A deadlocks. > > > > Commit ad7c946b35ad4 ("rcu: Create RCU-specific workqueues with rescuers") > > was accepted into mainline this past merge window. Does that do what > > you want, or are you looking for something else? > > Ah, that does it. Sorry, was looking at an older kernel. No worries -- after all, I must confess that I was a bit slow in getting to this. Thanx, Paul