Received: by 2002:ac0:a594:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m20-v6csp1228514imm; Wed, 23 May 2018 12:25:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZqtSwsUk5yaP5WF/v7tC4Tm9AjtAL8IHrJNRtvbseLZzAQ3WhbnfcanpwdM6hDC/uh/ceQB X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:758d:: with SMTP id j13-v6mr4230413pll.188.1527103524525; Wed, 23 May 2018 12:25:24 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1527103524; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=azhu4YCEMxfAabmLe2qOqcVgPuE8/6sUepTQBtNW1kbgCsytM6GDh2LI6PfcpuoWG1 DeH1QvvqsDc47DOWidEfUl0NkzRbhS4CfOp/+us/+Q2nbTivM6JcAD1tLqfvITFrEIsc AhVQQy0zbuNH81NKhBrI5lmgb002z8s0H7Q+ycy52+llUx543kVzaM1w4XCyY4MoYE6Y Ep9gLWs9y8ZfRxqca76+O2L28o5rImR5Rtgpo2WOHKFAcZXc6rh01MywgZWEZU2mK2nh wRVsSQ5Oyc+O8StoElLt2kD4pJdHVKrUQM9bwPsgAuMRWzse+ejvRlzJXTv1EFQI4ge+ Odsw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:from:subject:cc:to:message-id:date :arc-authentication-results; bh=8K9YT/e00Rirzy190/usziqeVzmfDQqydyNFBzd7IQ8=; b=KW33dFqD5TDHBhhlxr44Fz4FTzPgllCNP4Nk/h6LBFzEFQH1R06ZsGjQxTKYD1K3C/ HfdUGlsqU5/lrlfcZPwgaT4dJ5BHXOn/5q331O6m6Csd6q+/VEjVp2vFCQpOhtI/BP/1 yjqhSDN9vEco9SLQdYQBTytH5vUh5jbP9AGUELTenciun/WXryDyp7khsGyrXA0+Gj2V qMEp3nJJLZRloO2fujGuQfyu4mHIr4GG1zRR8TPwkeYUep4roJj+1BC6qpkub/qJkN5/ jBlDmyEoa+a4Ocr+8mlQShXTGQmPdzJaWdmD21G1PlJaJJTzAz19VGYP+APVfeJ3htuG K6Zg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a18-v6si15484740pgu.59.2018.05.23.12.25.10; Wed, 23 May 2018 12:25:24 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934722AbeEWTYr (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 23 May 2018 15:24:47 -0400 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:33782 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934667AbeEWTYn (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 May 2018 15:24:43 -0400 Received: from localhost (pool-173-77-163-54.nycmny.fios.verizon.net [173.77.163.54]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: davem-davemloft) by shards.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 52503144E5881; Wed, 23 May 2018 12:24:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 15:24:40 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <20180523.152440.915264101771444714.davem@davemloft.net> To: christianvanbrauner@gmail.com Cc: shuah@kernel.org, keescook@chromium.org, tglx@linutronix.de, kstewart@linuxfoundation.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, mic@digikod.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, ebiederm@xmission.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, christian@brauner.io Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests: uevent filtering From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20180522193421.7017-1-christian@brauner.io> References: <20180522193421.7017-1-christian@brauner.io> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 25.3 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.12 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Wed, 23 May 2018 12:24:42 -0700 (PDT) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Christian Brauner Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 21:34:21 +0200 > Recent discussions around uevent filtering (cf. net-next commit [1], [2], > and [3] and discussions in [4], [5], and [6]) have shown that the semantics > around uevent filtering where not well understood. > Now that we have settled - at least for the moment - how uevent filtering > should look like let's add some selftests to ensure we don't regress > anything in the future. > Note, the semantics of uevent filtering are described in detail in my > commit message to [2] so I won't repeat them here. > > [1]: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=90d52d4fd82007005125d9a8d2d560a1ca059b9d > [2]: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=a3498436b3a0f8ec289e6847e1de40b4123e1639 > [3]: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=26045a7b14bc7a5455e411d820110f66557d6589 > [4]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/4/739 > [5]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/26/767 > [6]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/26/738 > > Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner Applied to net-next, thanks.