Received: by 2002:ac0:a594:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m20-v6csp1810950imm; Thu, 24 May 2018 01:00:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZqnYkz8Eqx4rEjUjkjZiuhFeaVj5OEnAjeEfAwxLeacoLlx1OgCGedVJOGdPhSIHsa/TV8A X-Received: by 2002:a62:d352:: with SMTP id q79-v6mr6226961pfg.45.1527148845522; Thu, 24 May 2018 01:00:45 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1527148845; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=NqKe2xZqLVKZ08Yvmda4Blny2xugSCShaCEzSPDW72qLnIeXlEFzVxv8zdBtiXGwX6 atLgJl7AmtiGMvx6fdWo4fk9OmLc5LsvXnY/yaLcrEZgEpacCldFl1PlptvmO7mwn46U gCfVPDlc3QqO+Pn9eScHvHOo640aM4MYUKtpZmPMrSHD7hDhhYWh+7MJzmvgr1TB+J6r J0dlf4CgeBO6MUzcZQ7l4h8UM65GFgpdDHjgWSZhAdAFd87s8ChllTmgT7EyKHX/neTH qHntrD3GGOSClkimJIblC/2b698q0Paoog7ObNlx/HnCG4Y3blLuE4l+eWhR4aDMTZqu z3ig== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :references:in-reply-to:mime-version:dkim-signature :arc-authentication-results; bh=rmCnRRsO+dY6RbA4ezluRrsmD1CrFLo7uqaZzU+6aGE=; b=V3mZQpXzh1P/wMyXRYOIGaZqAXqOfHgOEntuM/iPDdohSGb8q1FaWyZ/mqyNkCTa+H LlFoYmnTG7IWgjAt/7kUSrXaQKb6kFmMC/cFzVezVtk1WQ8uJ4TTkYuE4yf5DMbqfM1s iEjDGjQL5+G6lAleY1madCw1HhdCpqEIFqZCsQsIMrAVKooH/5FzjCgs96lVfzOiZT6i URtI+EG3YExEj7dOviOcGOJKcyb9/hDsy2zMrblMvJi2/ZePmxlQLfPRXfg2PTCKDKgI Pf6fZ7nYV2LjttF80RQOtGT/PdIhktQzzh/JgP5Aqbqc/QEk7slTY8spU86wPl1wxEyq 25wg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=n8gJJ7u4; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d12-v6si21161780plo.551.2018.05.24.00.59.59; Thu, 24 May 2018 01:00:45 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=n8gJJ7u4; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965165AbeEXHpV (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 24 May 2018 03:45:21 -0400 Received: from mail-ot0-f196.google.com ([74.125.82.196]:44491 "EHLO mail-ot0-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S935502AbeEXHpT (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 May 2018 03:45:19 -0400 Received: by mail-ot0-f196.google.com with SMTP id g7-v6so800074otj.11; Thu, 24 May 2018 00:45:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=rmCnRRsO+dY6RbA4ezluRrsmD1CrFLo7uqaZzU+6aGE=; b=n8gJJ7u4rhvs4TZf+70pGtDhA+5Lz+gZY/dwuIY4B1TY4WcB9T33GFzrDdEdO8mxPP zcs7KRJfzstjfDmr7OSrkl+FNoDQWZyg/BlJkPZPnxHwN+k2OrApwXsAwb04QTcd8bvK YKZRLsnWWGDyOPgMoMjNwOwxantNew2Vu4Zowp0WCtVAsG0bBZRPZC9qxzCzHkF3/bNt O/LripPYxBpxMK/zRn4zNvBsZkmo7bMSTXAmI6iGWDfzzEd0BqJGDQWhMLc8EvzuUmfa crIOE9Cu99ydOTKR0rvvx43zfuQmClg2kZGbx7JwgZDN9ayhVG2TP6royWxKEbKgedV7 nXqw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=rmCnRRsO+dY6RbA4ezluRrsmD1CrFLo7uqaZzU+6aGE=; b=iwQeeQ3vsUjF6UMt0Mj+O5dySuYVyY884ZKVFij+4rA2ZtLigGrDLLiVqylynhE0GW fDpqoQzAAmmXMD84u8PWPzwSqiLtgur1uTP/Re4L0Iu0FPnOjIj8acZlBC8qfvY6vYrV 26DWo2o5/nEEB8UlR0eAqk8qCf3tnwANs82D1o6DJ0PYaBJfIOgsRGSEtm9qw/+kyN66 4yY/C0FSlMToufxKOxM5/5i05Qwaw0mAtK0DGthmBAUTNbK1x8Tgq6kg8+elMlx+WjLY rPDllqhBirf0hXmvU3496XO93Xj6g/h/2JFqKAvw04t3r/h+lFYBSboPbwsy3/d8UIrJ EiAw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwelXxSfXvfSl2zGZggRgkkjHDgs8iRTPU/B4Gf4luexpKzrXq5G tWiGr5ygxo9YzF9tf84CKun68GdfqU6N8hC8hnA= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:9d6:: with SMTP id 22-v6mr3659763otz.291.1527147918415; Thu, 24 May 2018 00:45:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a9d:1468:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Thu, 24 May 2018 00:45:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1527144234-96396-1-git-send-email-kevin.wangtao@hisilicon.com> References: <1527144234-96396-1-git-send-email-kevin.wangtao@hisilicon.com> From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 09:45:17 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: wPzIQ9ZemikLtjxKHesZ-2nXaOI Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: reinitialize new policy min/max when writing scaling_(max|min)_freq To: Kevin Wangtao Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Viresh Kumar , Linux PM , Linux Kernel Mailing List , gengyanping@hisilicon.com, sunzhaosheng@hisilicon.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 8:43 AM, Kevin Wangtao wrote: > consider such situation, current user_policy.min is 1000000, > current user_policy.max is 1200000, in cpufreq_set_policy, > other driver may update policy.min to 1200000, policy.max to > 1300000. After that, If we input "echo 1300000 > scaling_min_freq", > then user_policy.min will be 1300000, and user_policy.max is > still 1200000, because the input value is checked with policy.max > not user_policy.max. if we get all related cpus offline and > online again, it will cause cpufreq_init_policy fail because > user_policy.min is higher than user_policy.max. How do you reproduce this, exactly? > The solution is when user space tries to write scaling_(max|min)_freq, > the min/max of new_policy should be reinitialized with min/max > of user_policy, like what cpufreq_update_policy does. > > Signed-off-by: Kevin Wangtao > --- > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > index b79c532..8b33e08 100644 > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > @@ -697,6 +697,8 @@ static ssize_t store_##file_name \ > struct cpufreq_policy new_policy; \ > \ > memcpy(&new_policy, policy, sizeof(*policy)); \ > + new_policy->min = policy->user_policy.min; \ > + new_policy->max = policy->user_policy.max; \ It looks like you haven't even tried to build this, have you? > \ > ret = sscanf(buf, "%u", &new_policy.object); \ > if (ret != 1) \ > -- > 2.8.1 >