Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 17 Mar 2001 08:56:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 17 Mar 2001 08:56:32 -0500 Received: from netsonic.fi ([194.29.192.20]:45327 "EHLO nalle.netsonic.fi") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 17 Mar 2001 08:56:17 -0500 Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2001 15:55:20 +0200 (EET) From: Sampsa Ranta To: Manfred Spraul cc: , , , Subject: Re: Performance is weird (fwd) -> results In-Reply-To: <3AB2300E.33268BBC@colorfullife.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, Manfred Spraul wrote: > Sampsa Ranta wrote: > > > > After either of your patches, the result was the same, sorry. > > > Is apm or acpi running? No, I tried both SMP and non-SMP version of kernel, the machine is however single processor Athlon 900. CONFIG_ACPI is not set, CONFIG_APM is not set. The 2.4.3pre4 still performs 66M/s without "the load" and 124M/s+ with load. However there is much different between 2.4.2 and 2.4.3pre about 33M/s to 66M/s. - Sampsa Ranta sampsa@netsonic.fi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/