Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263426AbTIBD3i (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Sep 2003 23:29:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263444AbTIBD3i (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Sep 2003 23:29:38 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.224.249]:18636 "EHLO main.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263426AbTIBD3h (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Sep 2003 23:29:37 -0400 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Kevin Puetz Subject: Re: laptopkernel: dead? Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2003 22:29:33 -0500 Message-ID: References: <200309011423.15797.lkml@kcore.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org User-Agent: KNode/0.7.6 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 540 Lines: 12 Jan De Luyck wrote: > Hello, > > Just a quick question: is the laptopkernel kernelpatch dead? Last update > was for 2.4.21-rc8 ... > > Jan well, the ACPI changes (the main thing it contained, though not the only thing) were merged into mainline, so I suspect that's why the branch fizzled . - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/