Received: by 2002:ac0:a594:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m20-v6csp2957303imm; Thu, 24 May 2018 19:53:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZq4tDcHnFgyRntVR41XKF6GR/6EgAxjV4as8lrHNoUOlpMJRUQRzxkQB/xDGgVxxyxDs0v4 X-Received: by 2002:a65:5789:: with SMTP id b9-v6mr474181pgr.417.1527216801606; Thu, 24 May 2018 19:53:21 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1527216801; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=TqFIaYlxMkAma1jV2kaq675EzBBS8Cd6dDk56hjurVyOlrJBxGmdE2/eumP6C0lMD3 M9k2+OaGul4YtNU4vF+DggocD+EAWOb2mUUBOcPWPoFTEQX76bf5Kf6/o7VEwErOO4Qr 6JpXYYMlRLSCycFrQpdVIo5LqqktosFBqMhawihAPSTIryAEeGZCX4PZeVrs5GOt5to9 AhwKp9cAi+7e7+PsIQLZg5FwYpPaChUdhRDKsvFFLWjCCpeiQB7RIfCY9QbEbOS96G10 WnSY7+g7Kfq1NwLW/JYa9vkPCcMsm8BqzGjOKPnH+DcA4J94gOUB6teYhgDv8tJy0qLj Qa+g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :references:in-reply-to:mime-version:dkim-signature :arc-authentication-results; bh=JL2R8OvFPsg2g3OtEW9+GG+rGyYYq/ZolLjNHYdP/34=; b=PaoY596vuk6KpxX7QjgoBc0U15TLum4kDeKwGbKuSESqoQeFrt8a8NWPnP+XPHb1jF bSdrQSwgD9kQF/rgnNTtns/dau0cI+G0bc4M2QJvzTraUtYuEtpBfzphS1bTEzdnAnxJ UGXr06bD5+Y2hmGWNgE1ZoPOxLU1Gesw7Df3STZBgqhzknCLhU8TANNLQKfsSK+WJSUD YaID46km3j/zPT8lL5LRAjdJq7MqGXyzeegstsKxLaFb48aMyduJ6xz66bsc8gjYxOPS jyEO59y9gC6RjsJO4DHzNLyFA25THQW6lxfzfLTvtKqwqGaFAJlTFmOADqqV+lS2YmtN lBWA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=IqjLB9ia; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e13-v6si15138224pgt.332.2018.05.24.19.53.06; Thu, 24 May 2018 19:53:21 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=IqjLB9ia; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752361AbeEYCvr (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 24 May 2018 22:51:47 -0400 Received: from mail-wr0-f193.google.com ([209.85.128.193]:34251 "EHLO mail-wr0-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751235AbeEYCvo (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 May 2018 22:51:44 -0400 Received: by mail-wr0-f193.google.com with SMTP id j1-v6so6542848wrm.1 for ; Thu, 24 May 2018 19:51:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=JL2R8OvFPsg2g3OtEW9+GG+rGyYYq/ZolLjNHYdP/34=; b=IqjLB9iacHReZIgCfi9T/GBVoU91ciVj2fI2lHhx/eCLt7aY90oeUadNUKJLNjkonr Ges591gawT55LsSPZOY1Q28Q0ecgTYKdERrsEd675OcU0Z86JOn6ijItO+EywSJ17smm 6EfJVekp4fUF+9oDOgU6RwNgFaYWa+VlN/28w= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=JL2R8OvFPsg2g3OtEW9+GG+rGyYYq/ZolLjNHYdP/34=; b=FWMnrLXxO9eo/0iGr/RYsANiwAxHuKyI8Hh7f2qoMxMlGXdouobBn5ORcqX0EsLpO0 PHtwRKMBW/xREqOnl+xYBuj39ugWitZvo79+4XvzqZCXR2iutzdKilsopcg9E4U+nxMN 35TSmjMkTP2s3U7ffkdnRZmgDgCHVbhF8oPxBR3mP7UpShJQIfHgrs0ifA/cuZaC4UTY u7bOcrXZbG06HXeHT+YQkpkR54Hqf6pWKFwB4cl10QMoBoumytOR/KwlpfEqs/+ZHVlV IvDeZEGyEpftKlyZnFj10pLHoL9ZXdHazsl7nsH7djxPfOItjS+sdoaMkd02JS6crElM Um7A== X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwc8jxQw/RoLwbBiWaAO8wfm9uOWBYzgnCM0V3kGOC8WjVBclDFA /qaU69rkX07fzV6qWi7LwFiG8di0uD7tBuJV61KHDw== X-Received: by 2002:adf:9c01:: with SMTP id f1-v6mr367482wrc.171.1527216702667; Thu, 24 May 2018 19:51:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a1c:bd44:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Thu, 24 May 2018 19:51:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <006a01d3f3c8$88c24c40$9a46e4c0$@toshiba.co.jp> References: <20180524093159.286472249@linuxfoundation.org> <20180524180652.7bqyquqfe2nqdxfg@xps> <20180524190806.GE31019@kroah.com> <006a01d3f3c8$88c24c40$9a46e4c0$@toshiba.co.jp> From: Rafael Tinoco Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 23:51:02 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/92] 4.4.133-stable review To: Daniel Sangorrin Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk, stable@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Thank you Daniel! Will investigate those. Meanwhile, Greg, I referred to: time: Fix CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW sub-nanosecond accounting Since we're not using this type of clock on arm64's 4.4 kernel vdso functions. This commit's description calls attention for it to be responsible for fixing kselftest flacking tests, we wouldn't get that on 4.4 according to bellow: stable-rc-linux-4.14.y dbb236c1ceb6 arm64/vdso: Fix nsec handling for CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW 49eea433b326 arm64: Add support for CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW in clock_gettime() vDSO 82e88ff1ea94 hrtimer: Revert CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW support 9c808765e88e hrtimer: Add support for CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW stable-rc-linux-4.16.y dbb236c1ceb6 arm64/vdso: Fix nsec handling for CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW 49eea433b326 arm64: Add support for CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW in clock_gettime() vDSO 82e88ff1ea94 hrtimer: Revert CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW support 9c808765e88e hrtimer: Add support for CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW stable-rc-linux-4.4.y stable-rc-linux-4.9.y 99f66b5182a4 arm64/vdso: Fix nsec handling for CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW 49eea433b326 arm64: Add support for CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW in clock_gettime() vDSO 82e88ff1ea94 hrtimer: Revert CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW support 9c808765e88e hrtimer: Add support for CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW Yet, the second fix was backported to all (including 4.4.y): stable-rc-linux-4.14.y 3d88d56c5873 time: Fix CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW sub-nanosecond accounting stable-rc-linux-4.16.y 3d88d56c5873 time: Fix CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW sub-nanosecond accounting stable-rc-linux-4.4.y 7c8bd6e07430 time: Fix CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW sub-nanosecond accounting stable-rc-linux-4.9.y a53bfdda06ac time: Fix CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW sub-nanosecond accounting Not sure you want to keep it in 4.4, thought it was worth mentioning it. Cheers. On 24 May 2018 at 22:34, Daniel Sangorrin wrote: > Hello Rafael, > > The tests fcntl35 and fcntl35_64 should have go from FAIL to PASS. > https://www.spinics.net/lists/stable/msg239475.html > > Looking at > https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.4-oe/build/v4.4.132-93-g915a3d7cdea9/testrun/228569/suite/ltp-syscalls-tests/tests/ > I see that these two tests (and other important tests as well) are being SKIPPED. > > By the way, I see that select04 FAILS in your case. But in my setup, select04 was working fine (x86_64) in 4.4.132. I will confirm that it still works in 4.4.133 > > Thanks, > Daniel Sangorrin > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:stable-owner@vger.kernel.org] On >> Behalf Of Rafael Tinoco >> Sent: Friday, May 25, 2018 5:32 AM >> To: Greg Kroah-Hartman >> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; shuah@kernel.org; patches@kernelci.org; >> lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org; ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk; >> stable@vger.kernel.org; akpm@linux-foundation.org; >> torvalds@linux-foundation.org; linux@roeck-us.net >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/92] 4.4.133-stable review >> >> > > kernel: 4.4.133-rc1 >> > > git repo: >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git >> > > git branch: linux-4.4.y >> > > git commit: 915a3d7cdea9daa9e9fb6b855f10c1312e6910c4 >> > > git describe: v4.4.132-93-g915a3d7cdea9 >> > > Test details: >> https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.4-oe/build/v4.4.132-93-g915a >> 3d7cdea9 >> > > >> > > >> > > No regressions (compared to build v4.4.132-71-g180635995c36) >> > >> > It should have gotten better, as there was a fix in here for at least 2 >> > LTP tests that we previously were not passing. I don't know why you all >> > were not reporting that in the past, it took someone else randomly >> > deciding to run LTP to report it to me... >> > >> > Why did an improvement in results not show up? >> >> Are you referring to the CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW fix for the arm64 vDSO ? >> I think that CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW in VDSO wasn't backported to 4.4.y >> (commit 49eea433b326 in mainline) so this "fix" is changing the >> timekeeping sauce (that would fix MONOTONIC RAW) but not for 4.4.y in >> ARM64. Needs review though :\ > > >