Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 17 Mar 2001 14:05:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 17 Mar 2001 14:05:01 -0500 Received: from mx1out.umbc.edu ([130.85.253.51]:47560 "EHLO mx1out.umbc.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 17 Mar 2001 14:04:45 -0500 Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2001 14:04:02 -0500 From: John Jasen X-X-Sender: To: Aaron Lunansky cc: "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" , "'kees@shoen.nl'" Subject: Re: [OT] how to catch HW fault In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 17 Mar 2001, Aaron Lunansky wrote: > It could very well be your ram (I don't suspect the cpu). If you can, try a > different stick of ram. I've found a good exercise for exercising memory faults is to recompile the kernel with a -j16 flag; and in a second virtual console, do something like dd if=/dev/hda of=/dev/null bs=2048k Either the kernel compile will fail with a sig11, or the dd will fail and lock the system, in my experience. I've used this method, crudely, to chase down memory problems in systems using 256-512MB ram. YMMV. -- -- John E. Jasen (jjasen1@umbc.edu) -- In theory, theory and practise are the same. In practise, they aren't. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/