Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 25 May 2018 12:27:13 -0300
From:   Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To:     Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
Cc:     Robert Walker <robert.walker@arm.com>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tor Jeremiassen <tor@ti.com>,
        mike.leach@linaro.org, kim.phillips@arm.com,
        coresight@lists.linaro.org, Mike Leach <mike.leach@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFT v2 1/4] perf cs-etm: Generate sample for missed packets
Message-ID: <20180525152713.GD4091@kernel.org>
References: <1526892748-326-1-git-send-email-leo.yan@linaro.org>
 <1526892748-326-2-git-send-email-leo.yan@linaro.org>
 <bc320d6d-a21d-b5a4-e30d-511bb69aba32@arm.com>
 <20180522083920.GD31075@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s>
 <03a53a72-8af5-02de-21a8-fd02a0974ed6@arm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <03a53a72-8af5-02de-21a8-fd02a0974ed6@arm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Em Fri, May 25, 2018 at 03:03:47PM +0100, Robert Walker escreveu:
> Hi Leo,
> 
> Following the discussions from your reply to this with a simplified patch,
> this version of the patch works better as you also need to emit a branch
> sample when handling a CS_ETM_TRACE_ON packet to indicate the end of a block
> of trace.
> 
> This patch does not break the output from perf inject to generate
> instruction samples for AutoFDO, so I am happy with that.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Rob
> 
> Reviewed-by: Robert Walker <robert.walker@arm.com>

So, Leo, can you please resubmit, bumping the v2 to v3 (or the latest
one, I haven't fully reread this thread) add this "Reviewed-by: Robert"
tag and any other that people may have provided, so that I can merge it?

Thanks,

- Arnaldo
 
> 
> On 22/05/18 09:39, Leo Yan wrote:
> > Hi Rob,
> > 
> > On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 12:27:42PM +0100, Robert Walker wrote:
> > > Hi Leo,
> > > 
> > > On 21/05/18 09:52, Leo Yan wrote:
> > > > Commit e573e978fb12 ("perf cs-etm: Inject capabilitity for CoreSight
> > > > traces") reworks the samples generation flow from CoreSight trace to
> > > > match the correct format so Perf report tool can display the samples
> > > > properly.  But the change has side effect for packet handling, it only
> > > > generate samples when 'prev_packet->last_instr_taken_branch' is true,
> > > > this results in the start tracing packet and exception packets are
> > > > dropped.
> > > > 
> > > > This patch checks extra two conditions for complete samples:
> > > > 
> > > > - If 'prev_packet->sample_type' is zero we can use this condition to
> > > >    get to know this is the start tracing packet; for this case, the start
> > > >    packet's end_addr is zero as well so we need to handle it in the
> > > >    function cs_etm__last_executed_instr();
> > > > 
> > > I think you also need to add something in to handle discontinuities in
> > > trace - for example it is possible to configure the ETM to only trace
> > > execution in specific code regions or to trace a few cycles every so
> > > often. In these cases, prev_packet->sample_type will not be zero, but
> > > whatever the previous packet was.  You will get a CS_ETM_TRACE_ON packet in
> > > such cases, generated by an I_TRACE_ON element in the trace stream.
> > > You also get this on exception return.
> > > 
> > > However, you should also keep the test for prev_packet->sample_type == 0
> > > as you may not see a CS_ETM_TRACE_ON when decoding a buffer that has
> > > wrapped.
> > Thanks for reviewing.  Let's dig more detailed into this issue,
> > especially for handling packet CS_ETM_TRACE_ON, I'd like divide into two
> > sub cases.
> > 
> > - The first case is for using python script:
> > 
> >    I use python script to analyze packets with below command:
> >    ./perf script --itrace=ril128 -s arm-cs-trace-disasm.py -F cpu,event,ip,addr,sym -- -v -d objdump -k ./vmlinux
> > 
> >    What I observe is after we pass python script with parameter '-s
> >    arm-cs-trace-disasm.py', then instruction tracing options
> >    '--itrace=ril128' isn't really used;  the perf tool creates another
> >    new process for launch python script and re-enter cmd_script()
> >    function, but at the second time when invoke cmd_script() for python
> >    script execution the option '--itrace=ril128' is dropped and all
> >    parameters are only valid defined by the python script.
> > 
> >    As result, I can the variable 'etmq->etm->synth_opts.last_branch' is
> >    always FALSE for running python script.  So all CS_ETM_TRACE_ON
> >    packets will be ignored in the function cs_etm__flush().
> > 
> >    Even the CS_ETM_TRACE_ON packets are missed to handle, the program
> >    flow still can work well.  The reason is without the interference by
> >    CS_ETM_TRACE_ON, the CS_ETM_RANGE packets can smoothly create
> >    instruction range by ignore the middle CS_ETM_TRACE_ON packet.
> > 
> >    Please see below example, in this example there have 3 packets, the
> >    first one packet is CS_ETM_RANGE packet which is labelled with
> >    'PACKET_1', the first one packet can properly generate branch sample
> >    data with previous packet as expected;  the second packet is
> >    PACKET_2 which is CS_ETM_TRACE_ON, but
> >    'etmq->etm->synth_opts.last_branch' is false so function
> >    cs_etm__flush() doesn't handle it and skip the swap operation
> >    "etmq->prev_packet = tmp"; the third packet is PACKET_3, which is
> >    CS_ETM_RANGE packet and we can see it's smoontly to create
> >    continous instruction range between PACKET_1 and PACKET_3.
> > 
> >    cs_etm__sample: prev_packet: sample_type=1 exc=0 exc_ret=0 cpu=1 start_addr=0xffff000008a5f79c end_addr=0xffff000008a5f7bc last_instr_taken_branch=1
> >    PACKET_1: cs_etm__sample: packet: sample_type=1 exc=0 exc_ret=0 cpu=1 start_addr=0xffff000008a5f858 end_addr=0xffff000008a5f864 last_instr_taken_branch=1
> >    cs_etm__synth_branch_sample: ip=0xffff000008a5f7b8 addr=0xffff000008a5f858 pid=2290 tid=2290 id=1000000021 stream_id=1000000021 period=1 cpu=1 flags=0 cpumode=2
> > 
> >    cs_etm__flush: prev_packet: sample_type=1 exc=0 exc_ret=0 cpu=1 start_addr=0xffff000008a5f858 end_addr=0xffff000008a5f864 last_instr_taken_branch=1
> >    PACKET_2: cs_etm__flush: packet: sample_type=2 exc=0 exc_ret=0 cpu=2 start_addr=0xdeadbeefdeadbeef end_addr=0xdeadbeefdeadbeef last_instr_taken_branch=1
> > 
> >    cs_etm__sample: prev_packet: sample_type=1 exc=0 exc_ret=0 cpu=1 start_addr=0xffff000008a5f858 end_addr=0xffff000008a5f864 last_instr_taken_branch=1
> >    PACKET_3: cs_etm__sample: packet: sample_type=1 exc=0 exc_ret=0 cpu=2 start_addr=0xffff000008be7528 end_addr=0xffff000008be7538 last_instr_taken_branch=1
> >    cs_etm__synth_branch_sample: ip=0xffff000008a5f860 addr=0xffff000008be7528 pid=2290 tid=2290 id=1000000021 stream_id=1000000021 period=1 cpu=2 flags=0 cpumode=2
> > 
> >    So seems to me, the CS_ETM_TRACE_ON packet doesn't introduce trouble
> >    for the program flow analysis if we can handle all CS_ETM_RANGE
> >    packets and without handling CS_ETM_TRACE_ON packet for branch
> >    samples.
> > 
> > - The second case is for --itrace option without python script:
> >    ./perf script --itrace=ril -F cpu,event,ip,addr,sym -k ./vmlinux
> > 
> >    In this case, the flag 'etmq->etm->synth_opts.last_branch' is true
> >    so CS_ETM_TRACE_ON packet will be handled; but I can observe the
> >    CS_ETM_RANGE packet in etmq->prev_packet isn't handled in the
> >    function cs_etm__flush() for branch sample, so actually we miss some
> >    branch sample for this case.
> > 
> >    So I think we also need handle CS_ETM_RANGE packet in function
> >    cs_etm__flush() to generate branch samples.  But this has side
> >    effect, we introduce the extra track for CS_ETM_TRACE_ON packet for
> >    branch samples, so we will see one branch range like:
> >    [ 0xdeadbeefdeadbeef .. 0xdeadbeefdeadbeef ].
> > 
> > Please reivew below change is okay for you?  Thanks a lot for
> > suggestions.
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c b/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c
> > index 822ba91..37d3722 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c
> > @@ -495,6 +495,13 @@ static inline void cs_etm__reset_last_branch_rb(struct cs_etm_queue *etmq)
> >   static inline u64 cs_etm__last_executed_instr(struct cs_etm_packet *packet)
> >   {
> >   	/*
> > +	 * The packet is the start tracing packet if the end_addr is zero,
> > +	 * returns 0 for this case.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (!packet->end_addr)
> > +		return 0;
> > +
> > +	/*
> >   	 * The packet records the execution range with an exclusive end address
> >   	 *
> >   	 * A64 instructions are constant size, so the last executed
> > @@ -897,13 +904,28 @@ static int cs_etm__sample(struct cs_etm_queue *etmq)
> >   		etmq->period_instructions = instrs_over;
> >   	}
> > -	if (etm->sample_branches &&
> > -	    etmq->prev_packet &&
> > -	    etmq->prev_packet->sample_type == CS_ETM_RANGE &&
> > -	    etmq->prev_packet->last_instr_taken_branch) {
> > -		ret = cs_etm__synth_branch_sample(etmq);
> > -		if (ret)
> > -			return ret;
> > +	if (etm->sample_branches && etmq->prev_packet) {
> > +		bool generate_sample = false;
> > +
> > +		/* Generate sample for start tracing packet */
> > +		if (etmq->prev_packet->sample_type == 0 ||
> > +		    etmq->prev_packet->sample_type == CS_ETM_TRACE_ON)
> > +			generate_sample = true;
> > +
> > +		/* Generate sample for exception packet */
> > +		if (etmq->prev_packet->exc == true)
> > +			generate_sample = true;
> > +
> > +		/* Generate sample for normal branch packet */
> > +		if (etmq->prev_packet->sample_type == CS_ETM_RANGE &&
> > +		    etmq->prev_packet->last_instr_taken_branch)
> > +			generate_sample = true;
> > +
> > +		if (generate_sample) {
> > +			ret = cs_etm__synth_branch_sample(etmq);
> > +			if (ret)
> > +				return ret;
> > +		}
> >   	}
> >   	if (etm->sample_branches || etm->synth_opts.last_branch) {
> > @@ -921,12 +943,17 @@ static int cs_etm__sample(struct cs_etm_queue *etmq)
> >   static int cs_etm__flush(struct cs_etm_queue *etmq)
> >   {
> > +	struct cs_etm_auxtrace *etm = etmq->etm;
> >   	int err = 0;
> >   	struct cs_etm_packet *tmp;
> > -	if (etmq->etm->synth_opts.last_branch &&
> > -	    etmq->prev_packet &&
> > -	    etmq->prev_packet->sample_type == CS_ETM_RANGE) {
> > +	if (!etmq->prev_packet)
> > +		return 0;
> > +
> > +	if (etmq->prev_packet->sample_type != CS_ETM_RANGE)
> > +		return 0;
> > +
> > +	if (etmq->etm->synth_opts.last_branch) {
> >   		/*
> >   		 * Generate a last branch event for the branches left in the
> >   		 * circular buffer at the end of the trace.
> > @@ -939,18 +966,25 @@ static int cs_etm__flush(struct cs_etm_queue *etmq)
> >   		err = cs_etm__synth_instruction_sample(
> >   			etmq, addr,
> >   			etmq->period_instructions);
> > +		if (err)
> > +			return err;
> >   		etmq->period_instructions = 0;
> > +	}
> > -		/*
> > -		 * Swap PACKET with PREV_PACKET: PACKET becomes PREV_PACKET for
> > -		 * the next incoming packet.
> > -		 */
> > -		tmp = etmq->packet;
> > -		etmq->packet = etmq->prev_packet;
> > -		etmq->prev_packet = tmp;
> > +	if (etm->sample_branches) {
> > +		err = cs_etm__synth_branch_sample(etmq);
> > +		if (err)
> > +			return err;
> >   	}
> > -	return err;
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Swap PACKET with PREV_PACKET: PACKET becomes PREV_PACKET for
> > +	 * the next incoming packet.
> > +	 */
> > +	tmp = etmq->packet;
> > +	etmq->packet = etmq->prev_packet;
> > +	etmq->prev_packet = tmp;
> > +	return 0;
> >   }
> >   static int cs_etm__run_decoder(struct cs_etm_queue *etmq)