Received: by 2002:ac0:a594:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m20-v6csp3626024imm; Fri, 25 May 2018 08:49:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZpgtuZwgBaweMRPcbKagH7a8v5OSD2wb7iWKJe4rgHM0YKQ7nb4vt470O3cC+i37xN1hcf7 X-Received: by 2002:a63:788b:: with SMTP id t133-v6mr2473115pgc.20.1527263370444; Fri, 25 May 2018 08:49:30 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1527263370; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=lTDVPPLLMBSvNX63BBXFGuNn1ntL2FFLL13ouLwIqtIYClZ4O6lFHXKI3slWQQiD5K MDsbuCCSfaWkYDPY4IIB014l43cvAhktMJpjX7LCizMMExheI6c8vhiK3wYKaQbPtO4X gsgqLIrbY27vq4EchjCzEpJ7J5SDCHdEqXJBheFeVsrzI8mrVIZ2MAycacGEToKjMtYe /cpvym3Nu/FHCBwGbUnNfQWLgF0xfU2H1jg/EKf4Fbi3U/S0v1fesydtJjbqF40MER7S ec+jZ+VRl5QsnTzNZD7OaYB6jvjVcAcz1hepm+rJBjhh+dm5A9ZWlII3G10LHav8WV8p wv1Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:arc-authentication-results; bh=yjRRZrrRFeI2mRJWUtdQ9smoGYhF1+By3cZnOux15+8=; b=1E5GoYSr9wg+VtJjMGOPX7fllN/K6y/JoJ03VBZZiU00dWTYBimtUO6gbDFQ7/jzX+ ZDbMELQhCh5z+HjI44W+Qq2b0adAeIxCLzixWEyBm82mxl9hHaRig0tcnOUN6hkbCqOB SWHWGsWi7JzFo2JmHosQgnYoVF+F2CSvdIQRZoNeq09CZg/M5JbusvY9nNgVkurBhkPD /Xtk0KgQHWqDmIg9qCl1MzlGgf7QkcVXttQYkKtCCwZX6QvhcvNw6c3nGtLA7VzBLar1 oq8JLJwM2ZdmCOOIK10xajrZ/RDxoq8MtiR/sg9e049upeuNzbjmY80uFFyvxmRCzOQx VB1g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r3-v6si23732891plb.336.2018.05.25.08.49.15; Fri, 25 May 2018 08:49:30 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S966571AbeEYPtE (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 25 May 2018 11:49:04 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:35612 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965570AbeEYPtD (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 May 2018 11:49:03 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AD811529; Fri, 25 May 2018 08:49:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e107564-lin.cambridge.arm.com (e107564-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.2.131.9]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7D0473F557; Fri, 25 May 2018 08:49:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 25 May 2018 16:48:59 +0100 From: Brian Starkey To: Ayan Kumar Halder Cc: liviu.dudau@arm.com, alexandru-cosmin.gheorghe@arm.com, gustavo@padovan.org, maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, seanpaul@chromium.org, airlied@linux.ie, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nd@arm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: check_pixel_format() should return true if no modifiers are passed for a supported pixel format Message-ID: <20180525154859.GB1139@e107564-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <1527262541-13964-1-git-send-email-ayan.halder@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1527262541-13964-1-git-send-email-ayan.halder@arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Ayan, On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 04:35:41PM +0100, Ayan Kumar Halder wrote: >If a plane supports a pixel format and the framebuffer does not pass any >modifiers, then drm_plane_check_pixel_format() should always return true >for the given format regardless of whether the plane supports any >modifiers or not. > >Signed-off-by: Ayan Kumar Halder >--- > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > >diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane.c >index 6d2a6e4..873c084 100644 >--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane.c >+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane.c >@@ -564,6 +564,9 @@ int drm_plane_check_pixel_format(struct drm_plane *plane, > if (!plane->modifier_count) > return 0; > >+ if (modifier == DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NONE) >+ return 0; >+ There can be drivers which have formats which are only supported when a modifier is used - so I don't think this check is right to have in the core. Drivers need to check if they support the format with no modifier (same as DRM_FORMAT_MOD_LINEAR) in their format_mod_supported() callback. Thanks, -Brian > for (i = 0; i < plane->modifier_count; i++) { > if (modifier == plane->modifiers[i]) > break; >-- >2.7.4 >