Received: by 2002:ac0:a5b6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m51-v6csp397600imm; Sat, 26 May 2018 01:59:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZr7wi4JxUalKqqKhZmXzGuY+ANBncC409DGqmSdVCrqVpCJ2fAONLwTMJOQ63MAmsVnXL8I X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:b946:: with SMTP id h6-v6mr5969039pls.3.1527325159285; Sat, 26 May 2018 01:59:19 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1527325159; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=aUHyAIYXeOLCfmCXz/sD1OxWnWJCOXfsOcKUCMTVaxMNmt06FyPbY4ZytoPKjFdb4T t1u17A6IWgkKb7ys78BRgA0mhAORMAahbpCiwnz81GgVDV3fVhZ6ExGsAHDHB3kB0azu aeexz6tntzepnHg7TEFqH1Yz6KncYG9WelOewEYkKD21i6QA7bvA53V8N2OPWLRzbwUe kqWNyaeCuUs4EpVCqxvbP5mn6E2uUtG+MEDcMCCthPU5z3AG9n7Zb3qso9wXSR22RFbv 8i8C45Ur2bf05DYsFaw7krPzVWso3ORFwRZJtVXRPt3yo193lArM9J68xTpc86McDvfY /NWw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :organization:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from :date:arc-authentication-results; bh=aQ8XOEDAd+BvYkYsxP37SpYZ4vZ/w1MnGaHYZsqa330=; b=pLCbHT1OQRE+wLS0O7gJ4iwhITQYwp3pDdOv7/0X/pWIOclL8B33Xh2096nB24PoAO jy1aUkBr/Fqg/au9aTyZ2ys62QgEEtVFwwrHZWRHRxXTzMAOmulVvmcFIwmTRg1/JR8L phOuyLdD8b6ROiBlhHG3XnZzd1PAaRqaXELfeKFo8p4J+dbntNmKGwxrDMxjqHtRVmpD SvfTc8GHaLOql0//7cJOp8S4o1c51nWFDdmoO13a61x75o6tSe7B6TDf7d37+ZPsUCUb D0ONqoT0T1AOnSfE5p5B4zLlts6pOwquZQ1ka/SyDfo+izFCy56jBAepCR31iwTVlWbK EW+g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f1-v6si25505033pld.3.2018.05.26.01.59.03; Sat, 26 May 2018 01:59:19 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1031340AbeEZI65 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 26 May 2018 04:58:57 -0400 Received: from mail.bootlin.com ([62.4.15.54]:36143 "EHLO mail.bootlin.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1031247AbeEZI64 (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 May 2018 04:58:56 -0400 Received: by mail.bootlin.com (Postfix, from userid 110) id C334220750; Sat, 26 May 2018 10:58:54 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on mail.bootlin.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SHORTCIRCUIT shortcircuit=ham autolearn=disabled version=3.4.0 Received: from xps13 (unknown [37.171.152.122]) by mail.bootlin.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5CDEF2073D; Sat, 26 May 2018 10:58:42 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 26 May 2018 10:58:38 +0200 From: Miquel Raynal To: Abhishek Sahu Cc: Boris Brezillon , David Woodhouse , Brian Norris , Marek Vasut , Richard Weinberger , Cyrille Pitchen , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Andy Gross , Archit Taneja Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 13/16] mtd: rawnand: qcom: minor code reorganization for bad block check Message-ID: <20180526104900.139dd19b@xps13> In-Reply-To: <1527250904-21988-14-git-send-email-absahu@codeaurora.org> References: <1527250904-21988-1-git-send-email-absahu@codeaurora.org> <1527250904-21988-14-git-send-email-absahu@codeaurora.org> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.15.0-dirty (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Abhishek, > @@ -2141,12 +2127,10 @@ static int qcom_nandc_block_bad(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs) > goto err; > } > > - bbpos = mtd->writesize - host->cw_size * (ecc->steps - 1); > - > - bad = nandc->data_buffer[bbpos] != 0xff; > + bad = bbm_bytes_buf[0] != 0xff; BTW, as there are host->bbm_size bytes that can inform on the block state, don't we need to check all of them? > > if (chip->options & NAND_BUSWIDTH_16) > - bad = bad || (nandc->data_buffer[bbpos + 1] != 0xff); > + bad = bad || (bbm_bytes_buf[1] != 0xff); > err: > return bad; > } Thanks, Miquèl