Received: by 2002:ac0:a5b6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m51-v6csp397778imm; Sat, 26 May 2018 01:59:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZrk2y2fqs3zhCu2srINjcgTy3u4KHlc40uiEghNpig/JqAXo+K1c6dfEBKjKW+tmIjyo2D/ X-Received: by 2002:a62:7002:: with SMTP id l2-v6mr5797087pfc.40.1527325176957; Sat, 26 May 2018 01:59:36 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1527325176; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=vGhakWNT3F/RDbEnyr6kYKGfKQg0cA3dONtHGVzWHk/+OinIcTxARQNzGAU56RUeqo iNr//nSAcu5gd1JslGUhfikE84JuliCvdbTCXpg7tEhMu1ilMHz0rRIwm6YPkNE1g1vE VhZheIfZ9LVkb1yGdSM4nyZ9t/mOdIqSlbeG2+Eq+HoMEU+KXrr2OI/MgyfI8EfWui4q UGp9ER2Mnr3TWBKSX225D4+pm7kyIZT3AsqKAiFb6mqny2ayKfNXIa3ud5mYZ8y8+B2U jFru17Zsi3QvC/wMKf0J6HCevLSfUIo/6DDQf6QwMyX2N7CEW5Y2nDo17SVU7fR4iKSc Rs4A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :organization:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from :date:arc-authentication-results; bh=42CnsdMGmHwwQQv+hg9GVmebXL0FmjDCl3wW0hKI50c=; b=Rek2i+JyX36TeKambwMt0cI5gbZ9Bin5suDYX8cA1SE62Hl3lpRdM82oHm0DKIeXId vZ+7tfUaEBHw1V6Pt8r6xZHeBXVzYw4QRdKVE1HeZAg6azv7e4phIk/fEZfi/snE6itD /ZNgKdxyK6IfPmDoSKAG8w9TajIYYqVfyd8QQA+jVOISGt+Q6ijqfppcuEhH1NdAsps3 GvFCX12Np+YXC2VmbFZ00hQDeOZ1/UClBetc8MUxW9I689KQnskKszq81v44JIcmyX1B 0PRUYwnUNRXUx4bst6bUNqZJWhXT8nkWG7No7pn11WwcL6VOM0oeKYhQ4fSk8VQcSgk2 iYSw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z21-v6si24584286plo.465.2018.05.26.01.59.22; Sat, 26 May 2018 01:59:36 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1031398AbeEZI7G convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 26 May 2018 04:59:06 -0400 Received: from mail.bootlin.com ([62.4.15.54]:36154 "EHLO mail.bootlin.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1031247AbeEZI7E (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 May 2018 04:59:04 -0400 Received: by mail.bootlin.com (Postfix, from userid 110) id 3311E207B7; Sat, 26 May 2018 10:59:03 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on mail.bootlin.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SHORTCIRCUIT shortcircuit=ham autolearn=disabled version=3.4.0 Received: from xps13 (unknown [37.171.152.122]) by mail.bootlin.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5F3BB20012; Sat, 26 May 2018 10:58:51 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 26 May 2018 10:58:48 +0200 From: Miquel Raynal To: Abhishek Sahu Cc: Boris Brezillon , David Woodhouse , Brian Norris , Marek Vasut , Richard Weinberger , Cyrille Pitchen , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Andy Gross , Archit Taneja Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 14/16] mtd: rawnand: qcom: check for operation errors in case of raw read Message-ID: <20180526105848.2fb1080f@xps13> In-Reply-To: <1527250904-21988-15-git-send-email-absahu@codeaurora.org> References: <1527250904-21988-1-git-send-email-absahu@codeaurora.org> <1527250904-21988-15-git-send-email-absahu@codeaurora.org> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.15.0-dirty (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Abhishek, On Fri, 25 May 2018 17:51:42 +0530, Abhishek Sahu wrote: > Currently there is no error checking for raw read. For raw > reads, there won’t be any ECC failure but the operational > failures are possible, so schedule the NAND_FLASH_STATUS read > after each codeword. > > Signed-off-by: Abhishek Sahu > --- Acked-by: Miquel Raynal