Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261277AbTICEUH (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Sep 2003 00:20:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261679AbTICEUH (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Sep 2003 00:20:07 -0400 Received: from dp.samba.org ([66.70.73.150]:47336 "EHLO lists.samba.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261277AbTICEUE (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Sep 2003 00:20:04 -0400 Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 14:18:51 +1000 From: Anton Blanchard To: Larry McVoy , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Scaling noise Message-ID: <20030903041850.GA2978@krispykreme> References: <20030903040327.GA10257@work.bitmover.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030903040327.GA10257@work.bitmover.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 841 Lines: 20 > I've frequently tried to make the point that all the scaling for lots of > processors is nonsense. Mr Dell says it better: > > "Eight-way (servers) are less than 1 percent of the market and shrinking > pretty dramatically," Dell said. "If our competitors want to claim > they're No. 1 in eight-ways, that's fine. We want to lead the market > with two-way and four-way (processor machines)." > > Tell me again that it is a good idea to screw up uniprocessor performance > for 64 way machines. Great idea, that. Go Dinosaurs! And does your 4 way have hyperthreading? Anton - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/