Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        stable@vger.kernel.org, Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.16 139/272] ima: clear IMA_HASH
Date:   Mon, 28 May 2018 12:02:52 +0200
Message-Id: <20180528100252.722880471@linuxfoundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20180528100240.256525891@linuxfoundation.org>
References: <20180528100240.256525891@linuxfoundation.org>
User-Agent: quilt/0.65
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

4.16-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

[ Upstream commit a9a4935d44b58c858a81393694bc232a96cdcbd4 ]

The IMA_APPRAISE and IMA_HASH policies overlap. Clear IMA_HASH properly.

Fixes: da1b0029f527 ("ima: support new "hash" and "dont_hash" policy actions")
Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
@@ -384,7 +384,7 @@ int ima_match_policy(struct inode *inode
 		action |= entry->action & IMA_DO_MASK;
 		if (entry->action & IMA_APPRAISE) {
 			action |= get_subaction(entry, func);
-			action ^= IMA_HASH;
+			action &= ~IMA_HASH;
 		}
 
 		if (entry->action & IMA_DO_MASK)