Received: by 2002:ac0:a5b6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m51-v6csp2324700imm; Mon, 28 May 2018 06:05:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZoTzynGl+1GHIvjtidysDcgBZIL753HogGre/Pl0L+luXSHSTVyP/ial3u2Wc+RMZeNOSZr X-Received: by 2002:a63:ac57:: with SMTP id z23-v6mr9109700pgn.394.1527512754164; Mon, 28 May 2018 06:05:54 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1527512754; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=KDoYCNYna9IchBYmXi5kS6k1+sXBJpZhBG0NaBCdE034yOzvhdwgu9Vm1ufyVqYA8u KaaMQMxF07DoDTlPnOySvnF/lxSuiXmVuVgqN/Z4Lx/KGHZAUnYv9iTJp5/9PgWPBrLk OsT2tOPgHTQn//61JyvP1eFF6qDk+N+8cBRH1L+Ad17Ja4dYVuqq4xIhqi4S5HVmJubO Q/IipZ/Ozdajp3LPFY/EOrTkEk+2aUMu5LIGySS6Zlo6GHUUfkoYHAWoT2G4ZiSqovCw ESBxDxJnFF3IuAbtk7rtRJYJwPa8zcBMiRwgHsh1lhFjNSj7Hqw3P8Gm71wDila+JLDx 0Jyw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:dkim-signature :arc-authentication-results; bh=TFZqZaXs3ENOY2Ig+iwB6+LTB1sdDlHoLlrbwP5L/V4=; b=p+BtTjL/Nz7XD3bDNjez17Nb162o1RhFpIByjH2CUo5ED+aLwpVR76nIIhZy2+b+ov BMOOVJ/5k1iKt0Zwjvc+A5UE3thPZe0sNUQpxsbulXSDROPamTDi2yLC7fDPlmHNXXUR oGz5ylb2YanfTSItaKRoGiFzYZJnvxqmlVEDOntWCQIm2TJLQx8m+XK8bv80k/0VIUDu bm1fXiXWlMlHtLo8fv/rrlMiYvLu7gQSo2ApJIY0svmugPw2o4thOcF+zrH4gNWHQ7GO vIgfqsnh8jLbNNp3r1kxxszbbU83PcxlaMujkZCTnX/zImASnrgf3UPCXZDQsvTR8Hl6 onBg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=PhOuenhy; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l16-v6si29115375pff.270.2018.05.28.06.05.22; Mon, 28 May 2018 06:05:54 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=PhOuenhy; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1164022AbeE1Kwn (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 28 May 2018 06:52:43 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:41878 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1163817AbeE1Kwh (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 May 2018 06:52:37 -0400 Received: from localhost (LFbn-1-12247-202.w90-92.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.92.61.202]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A003C20883; Mon, 28 May 2018 10:52:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1527504756; bh=lRIluXuXMPeV2Ag3/7pl/dE6S0yZBnbytL4X9lsYzcE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=PhOuenhyCQcv58yM6kQfELwESpv8972FXmAzllT2cC1zc8F0aPxjINqmoLRl7EcK+ hygB2C8lq82t1KjDUlWA45tpkRwJJBPo3R+nhX1BP7gzU3FzMFIYVpHCMM3usf0z3e GubwiEmRzfMU9XU6++RNEvE1tc8BfijCRMMn1tTQ= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Taehee Yoo , Steffen Klassert , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 4.14 253/496] xfrm: fix rcu_read_unlock usage in xfrm_local_error Date: Mon, 28 May 2018 12:00:38 +0200 Message-Id: <20180528100330.553051491@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.0 In-Reply-To: <20180528100319.498712256@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20180528100319.498712256@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 X-stable: review MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Taehee Yoo [ Upstream commit 46c0ef6e1eb95f619d9f62da4332749153db92f7 ] In the xfrm_local_error, rcu_read_unlock should be called when afinfo is not NULL. because xfrm_state_get_afinfo calls rcu_read_unlock if afinfo is NULL. Fixes: af5d27c4e12b ("xfrm: remove xfrm_state_put_afinfo") Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- net/xfrm/xfrm_output.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_output.c +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_output.c @@ -285,8 +285,9 @@ void xfrm_local_error(struct sk_buff *sk return; afinfo = xfrm_state_get_afinfo(proto); - if (afinfo) + if (afinfo) { afinfo->local_error(skb, mtu); - rcu_read_unlock(); + rcu_read_unlock(); + } } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xfrm_local_error);