Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        stable@vger.kernel.org,
        Jonathan Billings <jsbillings@jsbillings.org>,
        David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 086/496] rxrpc: Work around usercopy check
Date:   Mon, 28 May 2018 11:57:51 +0200
Message-Id: <20180528100323.424942628@linuxfoundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20180528100319.498712256@linuxfoundation.org>
References: <20180528100319.498712256@linuxfoundation.org>
User-Agent: quilt/0.65
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

4.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

[ Upstream commit a16b8d0cf2ec1e626d24bc2a7b9e64ace6f7501d ]

Due to a check recently added to copy_to_user(), it's now not permitted to
copy from slab-held data to userspace unless the slab is whitelisted.  This
affects rxrpc_recvmsg() when it attempts to place an RXRPC_USER_CALL_ID
control message in the userspace control message buffer.  A warning is
generated by usercopy_warn() because the source is the copy of the
user_call_ID retained in the rxrpc_call struct.

Work around the issue by copying the user_call_ID to a variable on the
stack and passing that to put_cmsg().

The warning generated looks like:

	Bad or missing usercopy whitelist? Kernel memory exposure attempt detected from SLUB object 'dmaengine-unmap-128' (offset 680, size 8)!
	WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1401 at mm/usercopy.c:81 usercopy_warn+0x7e/0xa0
	...
	RIP: 0010:usercopy_warn+0x7e/0xa0
	...
	Call Trace:
	 __check_object_size+0x9c/0x1a0
	 put_cmsg+0x98/0x120
	 rxrpc_recvmsg+0x6fc/0x1010 [rxrpc]
	 ? finish_wait+0x80/0x80
	 ___sys_recvmsg+0xf8/0x240
	 ? __clear_rsb+0x25/0x3d
	 ? __clear_rsb+0x15/0x3d
	 ? __clear_rsb+0x25/0x3d
	 ? __clear_rsb+0x15/0x3d
	 ? __clear_rsb+0x25/0x3d
	 ? __clear_rsb+0x15/0x3d
	 ? __clear_rsb+0x25/0x3d
	 ? __clear_rsb+0x15/0x3d
	 ? finish_task_switch+0xa6/0x2b0
	 ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xed/0x180
	 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x29/0x40
	 ? __sys_recvmsg+0x4e/0x90
	 __sys_recvmsg+0x4e/0x90
	 do_syscall_64+0x7a/0x220
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x26/0x9b

Reported-by: Jonathan Billings <jsbillings@jsbillings.org>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Jonathan Billings <jsbillings@jsbillings.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 net/rxrpc/recvmsg.c |    5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/net/rxrpc/recvmsg.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/recvmsg.c
@@ -513,9 +513,10 @@ try_again:
 			ret = put_cmsg(msg, SOL_RXRPC, RXRPC_USER_CALL_ID,
 				       sizeof(unsigned int), &id32);
 		} else {
+			unsigned long idl = call->user_call_ID;
+
 			ret = put_cmsg(msg, SOL_RXRPC, RXRPC_USER_CALL_ID,
-				       sizeof(unsigned long),
-				       &call->user_call_ID);
+				       sizeof(unsigned long), &idl);
 		}
 		if (ret < 0)
 			goto error_unlock_call;