Received: by 2002:ac0:a5b6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m51-v6csp2433844imm; Mon, 28 May 2018 08:02:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZpiMtcIxu8zudQ6vxQP6WFQAZf/gVDVXL6R+buG7KZVDfypBv8iZgZ9dasC5GhcQze4a5ev X-Received: by 2002:a63:77c6:: with SMTP id s189-v6mr9577512pgc.450.1527519738633; Mon, 28 May 2018 08:02:18 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1527519738; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=GJdYiuJOkN6QDvEmMnmzToHUkaCs6W4N6dIQY4aF9ufQCk/mE+aSKIlK6yHNGGMl5Q y1hOlD5/azwZf0z/cBjepTHkMENOWCCM2SYqsmnBO22216QVwAYErv3/W+TTeGMGKIKm 710PJDM8HGYJjIkU9BGf5/d53C+URuprwu9Z2QwGQe/3hQQobZ8Q3Tff8VE2YzS2wpcr gLhu6+1IuI3Pd11pg2Xph9pkI0IbnJgYGRj8UsZLx41lNGIvi/uvMn7xwR3xY/meEAPT 3/K702YJFY7n2wniRfzQ73Lv3ePnOkBTLUemwJkZZ80MApCd4p21Ff73TeuIvtrVAbS3 /q4Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:dkim-signature :arc-authentication-results; bh=gmIW99szUjSpSy84G5XddsuuHfC0kiOk7Nj4PB1raYQ=; b=sWr8MVfkP6efyUh4rLJxCaZF5gwi/h8gNGnuL2lrzZUzkLUuvUiGkTJ5xiIsMhXihL lHEmzzzR/D4IeLWnWfx3wLvPD03kLYxoiyqs644RBEQUGpVL9Rp+EehYnyKP2XhkGRHF AzcJ1xUmd8zCX6lvlG02qLY0KxQvhCYm3SI/kqbQZnisk4bPJ6uHJGmeGqG3aMHnikeF AqwFp0joNkZ6t7ThlEaa6zOmkNPGbB9lkpFUWyIzSW0xU9dwI6b/JbdXWi/OsE/qMdvE IvL0JLbCZ4ItLZEMYRGJ0rRdWmIVPnwUJOG1HBKmGnTzI4upCLy0ary0brwR2S2fx9tP Stww== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=odYWkXtQ; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 95-v6si31247147plc.383.2018.05.28.08.02.01; Mon, 28 May 2018 08:02:18 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=odYWkXtQ; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S939547AbeE1O76 (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 28 May 2018 10:59:58 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:45874 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1033748AbeE1K03 (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 May 2018 06:26:29 -0400 Received: from localhost (LFbn-1-12247-202.w90-92.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.92.61.202]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 18C3520883; Mon, 28 May 2018 10:26:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1527503188; bh=5Uz+QIpJrHG4fR0m+MUX/Iwe7ynMJ2hvlGBA/oeNX20=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=odYWkXtQB3UESPNmvi6RVOhTpwNSLi/o644CInY5pZGiEYO+IYzEcwFJaeHL7Gax3 kD2CztUgr4FtbsMSFEpnt9l48CgINDvu7qIgK2GuoiUC/wN3rVLRp+Vyp51ZfeLddX plzB8tTWJgDrs5o24+qMeTN/GjD8OOh4RZxU2G3s= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Prashant Bhole , Willem de Bruijn , "David S. Miller" , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 4.4 259/268] selftests/net: fixes psock_fanout eBPF test case Date: Mon, 28 May 2018 12:03:53 +0200 Message-Id: <20180528100232.294430742@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.0 In-Reply-To: <20180528100202.045206534@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20180528100202.045206534@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 X-stable: review MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Prashant Bhole [ Upstream commit ddd0010392d9cbcb95b53d11b7cafc67b373ab56 ] eBPF test fails due to verifier failure because log_buf is too small. Fixed by increasing log_buf size Signed-off-by: Prashant Bhole Acked-by: Willem de Bruijn Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- tools/testing/selftests/net/psock_fanout.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/psock_fanout.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/psock_fanout.c @@ -97,6 +97,8 @@ static int sock_fanout_open(uint16_t typ static void sock_fanout_set_ebpf(int fd) { + static char log_buf[65536]; + const int len_off = __builtin_offsetof(struct __sk_buff, len); struct bpf_insn prog[] = { { BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MOV | BPF_X, 6, 1, 0, 0 }, @@ -109,7 +111,6 @@ static void sock_fanout_set_ebpf(int fd) { BPF_ALU | BPF_MOV | BPF_K, 0, 0, 0, 0 }, { BPF_JMP | BPF_EXIT, 0, 0, 0, 0 } }; - char log_buf[512]; union bpf_attr attr; int pfd;