Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: Revert "dmaengine: pl330: add DMA_PAUSE feature"
To:     Vinod <vkoul@kernel.org>
Cc:     Frank Mori Hess <fmh6jj@gmail.com>, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
        r.baldyga@hackerion.com, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
        Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
        Linux Samsung SOC <linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>
From:   Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Date:   Tue, 29 May 2018 07:17:44 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
        Thunderbird/52.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20180518072112.GG2932@vkoul-mobl>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Message-Id: <20180529051745eucas1p2ee6ec3e34f075d255c87f8f54a626784~zBcpaqmAb1928519285eucas1p2H@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
CMS-TYPE: 201P
References: <eb17d6a7-a188-3ef4-2641-5fd588b16431@samsung.com>
        <CAJz5Opfd9zeEAShFtUNhW4yLfVykef=2QdWWzq88Dtddn4eymQ@mail.gmail.com>
        <06f54061-c537-b399-e493-ec2cdf4def5d@samsung.com>
        <20180515062144.GC13271@vkoul-mobl>
        <CAJz5Open++Dj=a4ty-JbnZBFoqbMQKU6qYumJKSRMRLp_3erSw@mail.gmail.com>
        <20180517041946.GQ13271@vkoul-mobl>
        <CAJz5Opfep+TL0k_3kG7uQc_nU-BdFy1wsD1jo1agwtSvw0JibQ@mail.gmail.com>
        <CGME20180518040358epcas2p353b0096d33116ca78a03b16d24569813@epcas2p3.samsung.com>
        <20180518040349.GB2932@vkoul-mobl>
        <7f0b7404-ee12-977f-02a4-a463d1873aee@samsung.com>
        <20180518072112.GG2932@vkoul-mobl>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Vinod,

On 2018-05-18 09:21, Vinod wrote:
> On 18-05-18, 08:28, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>> Hi Vinod,
>>
>> Okay, I see that in theory, there are some tricky bits in implementing DMA
>> support in UART drivers. On the other hand there are already drivers
>> with seems
>> to be working fine. This discussion is about revert of the feature
>> present in
>> pl330 driver, which is required by other in-kernel driver without proper
>> fix to
>> them.
>>
>> Can we drop it for now and discuss what and how should be implemented to
>> make
>> everyone happy, without any regressions?
> Sure am dropping the revert, we can always bring it back if it is required

This revert is still in your -next branch. Do you plan to update it as well?

Best regards
-- 
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland