Received: by 2002:ac0:a5b6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m51-v6csp3132409imm; Tue, 29 May 2018 01:24:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZqNCEjoBrej1PYRWAu7zn98ukw6GvFHr0pVClPxWQmjIvLZt23e9CCwQ/1F5LMtA7hdHaTV X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:9b8a:: with SMTP id y10-v6mr16818041plp.124.1527582243057; Tue, 29 May 2018 01:24:03 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1527582243; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=GKhnaJu0wGBcx1evZSceVacP3/1hoUGb/U2P5Yk323T4x8NLEOQUujV5JUAWhk3l+I yPg3ixc+CzyFKHfywvCM0llrq8Rmj203Ak+oBOE+KHMCBehZCfkRw6dOfW2PzSwUb5By 1HNS4svO5L+lIYRB8b3yaSlYsETtUwPQQ0M9BGLnkxfHiQLqEn0bFoP6Rol1rt0QAqW2 RJyEM+K4FplhraYk4PDy5/OQcHsmLZmY33/VK/NUK9y78oNrUXWqtUronthwY+A7N6bx E1hQ6oAJaTTaYjS9oOTgLNn2DbCUVKjq/ni3UaTOoScU+BOQeM64EIA47hT6gqvrlyvO MDIw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:arc-authentication-results; bh=gYJbE97dzsVPzI0OOrC1E91Jv0CfTNnlOXV3h16Z1PI=; b=NGrOtyabwmYTlJdOqrL39F9lBcjXMojsrl7HcZ6gNeFCNpFs9kKqA4cgcY5OEg42wJ 79mcxtZev0Xay1ZjyRi29BzQOoD7cDIPU5n5P7rYlED1L4xZc5IzWcWIzUTR+rfAQ7eQ 99otCDUvoxnE3LBGqLXISA7eP1hpC9HnJ3GoXJTZgxtrS4iRBnQFpj2sXP3LiA7tHkVr TkhsAwE4qCUW1uKAaVr4Yp8dnwSBU1FxBVGKQrquw7r9KQpQ3Gy98C88TaZGTwvdRNP6 gO0724GSlLcTd9MDz4Nl8D4b8Zg5apZ2RhnzQYzflwgqZh+562nojWX6i5WwqbAQ+RX1 dfbQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c10-v6si26203979pge.596.2018.05.29.01.23.49; Tue, 29 May 2018 01:24:03 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932361AbeE2IWo (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 29 May 2018 04:22:44 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:46238 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755292AbeE2IWm (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 May 2018 04:22:42 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay1.suse.de (charybdis-ext-too.suse.de [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AE49AF79; Tue, 29 May 2018 08:22:41 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 10:22:40 +0200 From: Michal Hocko To: Nikolay Borisov Cc: Randy Dunlap , Jonathan Corbet , LKML , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, "Darrick J. Wong" , David Sterba Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: document scope NOFS, NOIO APIs Message-ID: <20180529082240.GP27180@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20180424183536.GF30619@thunk.org> <20180524114341.1101-1-mhocko@kernel.org> <6c9df175-df6c-2531-b90c-318e4fff72bb@infradead.org> <20180525075217.GF11881@dhcp22.suse.cz> <7c5d8afb-563f-43fd-50ef-d532550983c7@suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7c5d8afb-563f-43fd-50ef-d532550983c7@suse.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.5 (2018-04-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon 28-05-18 10:21:00, Nikolay Borisov wrote: > > > On 25.05.2018 10:52, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Thu 24-05-18 09:37:18, Randy Dunlap wrote: > >> On 05/24/2018 04:43 AM, Michal Hocko wrote: > > [...] > >>> +The traditional way to avoid this deadlock problem is to clear __GFP_FS > >>> +resp. __GFP_IO (note the later implies clearing the first as well) in > >> > >> latter > > > > ? > > No I really meant that clearing __GFP_IO implies __GFP_FS clearing > Sorry to barge in like that, but Randy is right. > > > > > https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/latter > > " of, relating to, or being the second of two groups or things or the > last of several groups or things referred to > > Fixed -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs