Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 29 May 2018 11:35:41 +0300
To:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc:     Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com>,
        mturquette@baylibre.com, sboyd@kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
        mark.rutland@arm.com, lgirdwood@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org,
        mazziesaccount@gmail.com, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        mikko.mutanen@fi.rohmeurope.com, heikki.haikola@fi.rohmeurope.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] mfd/regulator/clk: bd71837: ROHM BD71837 PMIC
 driver
Message-ID: <20180529083541.GA13528@localhost.localdomain>
References: <20180528090003.GA8778@localhost.localdomain>
 <20180529073958.GB4790@dell>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180529073958.GB4790@dell>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hello,

On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 08:39:58AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Mon, 28 May 2018, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> 
> > Patch series adding support for ROHM BD71837 PMIC.
> FYI, this patch-set is going to be difficult to manage since it was
> not sent 'threaded'.
> 
> If/when you send a subsequent version, could you please ensure you
> send the set threaded so the patches keep in relation to one another
> as they are reviewed?

Thanks for the guidance. I have not sent so many patches to community so
I am grateful also from all the practical tips =) Just one slight problem.
I have only seen emails being threaded when one is replying to an email.
So how should I send my patches in same thread? Just send first one and
then send subsequent patches as replies?

I just killed some unused definitions and one unused variable from the
code so I am about to send new version. I'll try doing that as a threaded
series and resend all the patches as v3.

Br,
	Matti Vaittinen