Received: by 2002:ac0:a5b6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m51-v6csp3342770imm; Tue, 29 May 2018 05:44:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZrLfOhX+DtARi8SBfirY1zYN42NikYmGGED516VRlDngOd3XuqMx5xldO4Je8b3qH5RMVOA X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:b087:: with SMTP id p7-v6mr17465596plr.227.1527597855682; Tue, 29 May 2018 05:44:15 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1527597855; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=YaT0tHoAfCZaWeKkUUfScZVPiPE/pj4Zm7lsZ7E2HHp38ihiRHmsBK8LRFJpfeN9Pq 3BuT9jYq6Doj6ohr0/QbVAAeRGaHFg3fFjHuEugC2j8dNGF48T7KefA7rqFwcePFT0JA r/+1w/7ksknynkwUh1e6tiBbEX6hFAGlNxd2cFkvemFr5MuM8p18DUoX8LXAzQD5JXHb ORszC92XO72OFvsB4pdcTQRerI0vz0h8UMmgvrny9u1tCT0QxXcnyOZQbaBNQqEpJPRY 7H2FUfccmK3hJRGWK9n8SM+963YfmgSEtOrioQpEuhv73FJkwpflsiVTPmdEZXjJQB3m KB7g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:subject:mime-version:user-agent :message-id:in-reply-to:date:references:cc:to:from :arc-authentication-results; bh=qTs2QPlFePb4P6aJ6yKZ1fNJ7TwmeqZ4EQK4SLvASvI=; b=elYUTcUk1mjYJ+3BH+JkAbrlmjJKZuQX/VYM3utH7WFezri5Zw69uj3bg9ZtGeXlPx pm5pfLDqYVoS66rAVTpmNsRf+K+mSRgxw6EuWe0vxWJ2RmjXJX4xlgWmmn2RskmAfkiG nuse7OcM05aStHRTpjYloBvrOYN9RAtVgaKf451OE1ubK8IOnBSpbPqshcdnr7hJP/KI aL8S8ZvC9Jukddnk+2xiQeALtzzzhNCpY7+ktPJKLNZHsaalouXLu3dn+96Jzj3irE8J MONqAs/CQZWOgnnoenS1ms02B96SEoUpGfD5ieoPdmmhvh2Lf0Yjr+BKkOAh7QdP7Qqt rkoA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w19-v6si31147085plp.538.2018.05.29.05.44.01; Tue, 29 May 2018 05:44:15 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934061AbeE2Mmz (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 29 May 2018 08:42:55 -0400 Received: from out01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.231]:39643 "EHLO out01.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933565AbeE2Mmw (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 May 2018 08:42:52 -0400 Received: from in02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.52]) by out01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1fNdxi-0004rp-Pt; Tue, 29 May 2018 06:42:50 -0600 Received: from [97.119.174.25] (helo=x220.xmission.com) by in02.mta.xmission.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1fNdxh-0003Wy-EO; Tue, 29 May 2018 06:42:50 -0600 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Miklos Szeredi Cc: lkml , Linux Containers , linux-fsdevel , Alban Crequy , Seth Forshee , Sargun Dhillon , Dongsu Park , "Serge E. Hallyn" , Miklos Szeredi References: <87r2mre5b3.fsf@xmission.com> <87wovubbdf.fsf@xmission.com> Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 07:42:35 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87wovubbdf.fsf@xmission.com> (Eric W. Biederman's message of "Wed, 23 May 2018 11:11:24 -0500") Message-ID: <877enmskec.fsf@xmission.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-XM-SPF: eid=1fNdxh-0003Wy-EO;;;mid=<877enmskec.fsf@xmission.com>;;;hst=in02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=97.119.174.25;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX18a0sxZTkZXm8QbbBxsF4Ez1ipIovNQuyw= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 97.119.174.25 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on sa02.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.7 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,LotsOfNums_01,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG,XMSubLong autolearn=disabled version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * 1.2 LotsOfNums_01 BODY: Lots of long strings of numbers * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.5000] * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa02 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa02 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: *;Miklos Szeredi X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 830 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.09 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 3.4 (0.4%), b_tie_ro: 2.2 (0.3%), parse: 1.51 (0.2%), extract_message_metadata: 28 (3.4%), get_uri_detail_list: 4.7 (0.6%), tests_pri_-1000: 11 (1.3%), tests_pri_-950: 2.2 (0.3%), tests_pri_-900: 1.79 (0.2%), tests_pri_-400: 40 (4.8%), check_bayes: 37 (4.5%), b_tokenize: 16 (1.9%), b_tok_get_all: 9 (1.0%), b_comp_prob: 5 (0.7%), b_tok_touch_all: 3.6 (0.4%), b_finish: 0.88 (0.1%), tests_pri_0: 726 (87.4%), check_dkim_signature: 1.11 (0.1%), check_dkim_adsp: 4.9 (0.6%), tests_pri_500: 11 (1.3%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: [PATCH] fuse: Ensure posix acls are translated outside of init_user_ns X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) writes: > ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) writes: > >> Ensure the translation happens by failing to read or write >> posix acls when the filesystem has not indicated it supports >> posix acls. >> >> This ensures that modern cached posix acl support is available >> and used when dealing with posix acls. This is important >> because only that path has the code to convernt the uids and >> gids in posix acls into the user namespace of a fuse filesystem. >> >> Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" >> --- > > ping. > > Miklos are you around where you can look at this? Perhaps I got the wrong email address. Ping? > >> Miklos after several attempts to handle this better last cycle. I >> figure we should go with the stupid version for now. I think I know >> how to do better but I don't want that to gate forward progress on >> fully unprivileged fuse mounts. Especially as this is the last known >> issue to deal with. >> >> fs/fuse/fuse_i.h | 1 + >> fs/fuse/inode.c | 7 +++++++ >> fs/fuse/xattr.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 3 files changed, 51 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h b/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h >> index f630951df8dc..5256ad333b05 100644 >> --- a/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h >> +++ b/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h >> @@ -985,6 +985,7 @@ ssize_t fuse_listxattr(struct dentry *entry, char *list, size_t size); >> int fuse_removexattr(struct inode *inode, const char *name); >> extern const struct xattr_handler *fuse_xattr_handlers[]; >> extern const struct xattr_handler *fuse_acl_xattr_handlers[]; >> +extern const struct xattr_handler *fuse_no_acl_xattr_handlers[]; >> >> struct posix_acl; >> struct posix_acl *fuse_get_acl(struct inode *inode, int type); >> diff --git a/fs/fuse/inode.c b/fs/fuse/inode.c >> index 1643043d4fe5..22c76cf8c2e3 100644 >> --- a/fs/fuse/inode.c >> +++ b/fs/fuse/inode.c >> @@ -1100,6 +1100,13 @@ static int fuse_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent) >> file->f_cred->user_ns != sb->s_user_ns) >> goto err_fput; >> >> + /* >> + * If we are not in the initial user namespace posix >> + * acls must be translated. >> + */ >> + if (sb->s_user_ns != &init_user_ns) >> + sb->s_xattr = fuse_no_acl_xattr_handlers; >> + >> fc = kmalloc(sizeof(*fc), GFP_KERNEL); >> err = -ENOMEM; >> if (!fc) >> diff --git a/fs/fuse/xattr.c b/fs/fuse/xattr.c >> index 3caac46b08b0..433717640f78 100644 >> --- a/fs/fuse/xattr.c >> +++ b/fs/fuse/xattr.c >> @@ -192,6 +192,26 @@ static int fuse_xattr_set(const struct xattr_handler *handler, >> return fuse_setxattr(inode, name, value, size, flags); >> } >> >> +static bool no_xattr_list(struct dentry *dentry) >> +{ >> + return false; >> +} >> + >> +static int no_xattr_get(const struct xattr_handler *handler, >> + struct dentry *dentry, struct inode *inode, >> + const char *name, void *value, size_t size) >> +{ >> + return -EOPNOTSUPP; >> +} >> + >> +static int no_xattr_set(const struct xattr_handler *handler, >> + struct dentry *dentry, struct inode *nodee, >> + const char *name, const void *value, >> + size_t size, int flags) >> +{ >> + return -EOPNOTSUPP; >> +} >> + >> static const struct xattr_handler fuse_xattr_handler = { >> .prefix = "", >> .get = fuse_xattr_get, >> @@ -209,3 +229,26 @@ const struct xattr_handler *fuse_acl_xattr_handlers[] = { >> &fuse_xattr_handler, >> NULL >> }; >> + >> +static const struct xattr_handler fuse_no_acl_access_xattr_handler = { >> + .name = XATTR_NAME_POSIX_ACL_ACCESS, >> + .flags = ACL_TYPE_ACCESS, >> + .list = no_xattr_list, >> + .get = no_xattr_get, >> + .set = no_xattr_set, >> +}; >> + >> +static const struct xattr_handler fuse_no_acl_default_xattr_handler = { >> + .name = XATTR_NAME_POSIX_ACL_DEFAULT, >> + .flags = ACL_TYPE_ACCESS, >> + .list = no_xattr_list, >> + .get = no_xattr_get, >> + .set = no_xattr_set, >> +}; >> + >> +const struct xattr_handler *fuse_no_acl_xattr_handlers[] = { >> + &fuse_no_acl_access_xattr_handler, >> + &fuse_no_acl_default_xattr_handler, >> + &fuse_xattr_handler, >> + NULL >> +};