Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263721AbTICRWR (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Sep 2003 13:22:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263532AbTICRVU (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Sep 2003 13:21:20 -0400 Received: from holomorphy.com ([66.224.33.161]:6281 "EHLO holomorphy") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263659AbTICRUO (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Sep 2003 13:20:14 -0400 Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 10:21:04 -0700 From: William Lee Irwin III To: Cliff White Cc: Nick Piggin , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: UP Regression (was) Re: Scaling noise Message-ID: <20030903172104.GO4306@holomorphy.com> Mail-Followup-To: William Lee Irwin III , Cliff White , Nick Piggin , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <3F55907B.1030700@cyberone.com.au> <200309031551.h83Fpu413835@mail.osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200309031551.h83Fpu413835@mail.osdl.org> Organization: The Domain of Holomorphy User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 814 Lines: 19 On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 08:51:56AM -0700, Cliff White wrote: > On the Scalable Test Platform, running osdl-aim-7, for the > UP case, 2.4 is a bit better than 2.6, this is consistent across > many runs. For SMP, 2.6 is better, but the delta is rather > small, until we get to 8 CPUS. We have a lot of un-parsed data from other > tests - might be some trends there also. > See http://developer.osdl.org/cliffw/reaim/index.html > 2.4 kernels are at the bottom of the page. Do you have profile data for these runs? Also, that webpage doesn't have 2.4.x results. -- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/