Received: by 2002:ac0:a5b6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m51-v6csp3661426imm; Tue, 29 May 2018 11:05:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZrkOmUkmv0o/Y1zaKcObDKt0PZoNhEScyo2qMcfaafOaI3hETdzyHN5z8heDcxXnqBAnsWm X-Received: by 2002:a65:4805:: with SMTP id h5-v6mr14616726pgs.96.1527617135453; Tue, 29 May 2018 11:05:35 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1527617135; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=FQRv8f8qJRAJ4vX+yiPxOiOYEknNTbk/R3BdHY7Pa1HI8MZjUVZfhMJWErxuAAaAg2 fN4sV4hL2QPu6BC2dYrRXTUGd0ci5ouCN4smQV9vDoHiGZf2RwCA35MC60h5olNTxwHa owlDNY8hZ3x6PF0xVRU6xsdZGzKkX0+49pVUJ8mFQ3n62RJ5XSu8H/zO/96ZqvHNmYOc s2p8mDz/yntG4z5oXX9QRd9n0FQ/a1JIyo5rWLJ2D4j1Z23Oca+FNimU+c+F/e7leQv7 1Z4zqMpPxpRkvpDMh5dRKnA9wYtQlarmC9IcUd801gOhw9c1UySs1RxlSBt3a8QEY3Wj 8SFg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:references:in-reply-to:date :subject:cc:to:from:arc-authentication-results; bh=xagU8FbVopmjN+TR83EPMVD1uPKi3XlKyhQM/60waI8=; b=bL9LHSg32atMFK9tb51k7wxkz4Z5h9rHt6+F24B/YjEGzp99+kDZ7wv/joSkvPElZX NJhvnd72LgZZBmKh5NdrMpM3aZ5aq0Db6MK/hhU9KFN/DTzTmMvYjp/mieecEgmM+tGO gRrh1iXIW2wtz9rciWjYgCcKdNcN00YOJi30FY9pUa8ZRKXoLW/jchKBIDHCgK/ygAun mSdTxpb9OzxONQbMTWshuQ/r26M4ESueUO7ZwMh8mLFnwsOD/aHGVImfp4udnV8H8oc/ bhDzmS2FDUwWgE+Hc8RcUPFwj0F2mxQrLELN+2uzOZO3+G0ETCjRSgbmT7LkCISzYuMZ K4wQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z23-v6si33950882plo.492.2018.05.29.11.05.21; Tue, 29 May 2018 11:05:35 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965960AbeE2SDU (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 29 May 2018 14:03:20 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:45780 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965822AbeE2SCb (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 May 2018 14:02:31 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098394.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w4THsanu106975 for ; Tue, 29 May 2018 14:02:31 -0400 Received: from e06smtp12.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp12.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.108]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2j9a5pvesp-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 29 May 2018 14:02:30 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp12.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 29 May 2018 19:02:27 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.195) by e06smtp12.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.142) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Tue, 29 May 2018 19:02:23 +0100 Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.62]) by b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w4TI2MGj21233816 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 29 May 2018 18:02:23 GMT Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 793F3AE058; Tue, 29 May 2018 18:51:29 +0100 (BST) Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B974AE045; Tue, 29 May 2018 18:51:28 +0100 (BST) Received: from dhcp-9-2-54-219.watson.ibm.com (unknown [9.2.54.219]) by d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 May 2018 18:51:28 +0100 (BST) From: Mimi Zohar To: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Cc: Mimi Zohar , linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Howells , "Luis R . Rodriguez" , Eric Biederman , kexec@lists.infradead.org, Andres Rodriguez , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Ard Biesheuvel Subject: [PATCH v4 6/8] ima: add build time policy Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 14:01:58 -0400 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.5 In-Reply-To: <1527616920-5415-1-git-send-email-zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1527616920-5415-1-git-send-email-zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18052918-0008-0000-0000-000004FC48D2 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18052918-0009-0000-0000-00001E906784 Message-Id: <1527616920-5415-7-git-send-email-zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2018-05-29_07:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=6 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1709140000 definitions=main-1805290195 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org IMA by default does not measure, appraise or audit files, but can be enabled at runtime by specifying a builtin policy on the boot command line or by loading a custom policy. This patch defines a build time policy, which verifies kernel modules, firmware, kexec image, and/or the IMA policy signatures. This build time policy is automatically enabled at runtime and persists after loading a custom policy. Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar --- security/integrity/ima/Kconfig | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 101 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig b/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig index 6a8f67714c83..004919d9bf09 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig +++ b/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig @@ -156,6 +156,64 @@ config IMA_APPRAISE If unsure, say N. +config IMA_APPRAISE_BUILD_POLICY + bool "IMA build time configured policy rules" + depends on IMA_APPRAISE && INTEGRITY_ASYMMETRIC_KEYS + default n + help + This option defines an IMA appraisal policy at build time, which + is enforced at run time without having to specify a builtin + policy name on the boot command line. The build time appraisal + policy rules persist after loading a custom policy. + + Depending on the rules configured, this policy may require kernel + modules, firmware, the kexec kernel image, and/or the IMA policy + to be signed. Unsigned files might prevent the system from + booting or applications from working properly. + +config IMA_APPRAISE_REQUIRE_FIRMWARE_SIGS + bool "Appraise firmware signatures" + depends on IMA_APPRAISE_BUILD_POLICY + default n + help + This option defines a policy requiring all firmware to be signed, + including the regulatory.db. If both this option and + CFG80211_REQUIRE_SIGNED_REGDB are enabled, then both signature + verification methods are necessary. + +config IMA_APPRAISE_REQUIRE_KEXEC_SIGS + bool "Appraise kexec kernel image signatures" + depends on IMA_APPRAISE_BUILD_POLICY + default n + help + Enabling this rule will require all kexec'ed kernel images to + be signed and verified by a public key on the trusted IMA + keyring. + + Kernel image signatures can not be verified by the original + kexec_load syscall. Enabling this rule will prevent its + usage. + +config IMA_APPRAISE_REQUIRE_MODULE_SIGS + bool "Appraise kernel modules signatures" + depends on IMA_APPRAISE_BUILD_POLICY + default n + help + Enabling this rule will require all kernel modules to be signed + and verified by a public key on the trusted IMA keyring. + + Kernel module signatures can only be verified by IMA-appraisal, + via the finit_module syscall. Enabling this rule will prevent + the usage of the init_module syscall. + +config IMA_APPRAISE_REQUIRE_POLICY_SIGS + bool "Appraise IMA policy signature" + depends on IMA_APPRAISE_BUILD_POLICY + default n + help + Enabling this rule will require the IMA policy to be signed and + and verified by a key on the trusted IMA keyring. + config IMA_APPRAISE_BOOTPARAM bool "ima_appraise boot parameter" depends on IMA_APPRAISE diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c index c27f6993b07a..3c0bc8a1a88e 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ int ima_policy_flag; static int temp_ima_appraise; +static int build_ima_appraise __ro_after_init; #define MAX_LSM_RULES 6 enum lsm_rule_types { LSM_OBJ_USER, LSM_OBJ_ROLE, LSM_OBJ_TYPE, @@ -162,6 +163,25 @@ static struct ima_rule_entry default_appraise_rules[] __ro_after_init = { #endif }; +static struct ima_rule_entry build_appraise_rules[] __ro_after_init = { +#ifdef CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE_REQUIRE_MODULE_SIGS + {.action = APPRAISE, .func = MODULE_CHECK, + .flags = IMA_FUNC | IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED}, +#endif +#ifdef CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE_REQUIRE_FIRMWARE_SIGS + {.action = APPRAISE, .func = FIRMWARE_CHECK, + .flags = IMA_FUNC | IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED}, +#endif +#ifdef CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE_REQUIRE_KEXEC_SIGS + {.action = APPRAISE, .func = KEXEC_KERNEL_CHECK, + .flags = IMA_FUNC | IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED}, +#endif +#ifdef CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE_REQUIRE_POLICY_SIGS + {.action = APPRAISE, .func = POLICY_CHECK, + .flags = IMA_FUNC | IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED}, +#endif +}; + static struct ima_rule_entry secure_boot_rules[] __ro_after_init = { {.action = APPRAISE, .func = MODULE_CHECK, .flags = IMA_FUNC | IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED}, @@ -435,7 +455,7 @@ void ima_update_policy_flag(void) ima_policy_flag |= entry->action; } - ima_appraise |= temp_ima_appraise; + ima_appraise |= (build_ima_appraise | temp_ima_appraise); if (!ima_appraise) ima_policy_flag &= ~IMA_APPRAISE; } @@ -488,8 +508,8 @@ void __init ima_init_policy(void) } /* - * Insert the appraise rules requiring file signatures, prior to - * any other appraise rules. + * Insert the builtin "secure_boot" policy rules requiring file + * signatures, prior to any other appraise rules. */ for (i = 0; i < secure_boot_entries; i++) { list_add_tail(&secure_boot_rules[i].list, &ima_default_rules); @@ -497,6 +517,26 @@ void __init ima_init_policy(void) ima_appraise_flag(secure_boot_rules[i].func); } + /* + * Insert the build time appraise rules requiring file signatures + * for both the initial and custom policies, prior to other appraise + * rules. + */ + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(build_appraise_rules); i++) { + struct ima_rule_entry *entry; + + if (!secure_boot_entries) + list_add_tail(&build_appraise_rules[i].list, + &ima_default_rules); + + entry = kmemdup(&build_appraise_rules[i], sizeof(*entry), + GFP_KERNEL); + if (entry) + list_add_tail(&entry->list, &ima_policy_rules); + build_ima_appraise |= + ima_appraise_flag(build_appraise_rules[i].func); + } + for (i = 0; i < appraise_entries; i++) { list_add_tail(&default_appraise_rules[i].list, &ima_default_rules); -- 2.7.5