Received: by 2002:ac0:a5b6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m51-v6csp3923312imm; Tue, 29 May 2018 17:09:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKIM6QiCoPdU7UTO8y5H7fNm993n4xS+gQP6PxpMbm+FrgESIO1R6heEtBw96xe9hAHbImu7 X-Received: by 2002:a62:4387:: with SMTP id l7-v6mr492564pfi.55.1527638950990; Tue, 29 May 2018 17:09:10 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1527638950; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=stvf++NZf2imUkiFcYpEnqhHwDqOxZZwE6xWO7k+7I8v2RgGTzR1Ib3zoUfy7U6s4n L9Oz1EKsSZ8DIAsacv5WIsAM4kHNob3iloXWO6Vd757V0UhMbOXdNgVojlh7QGfAQjya e+Zz5y90YXciYuRH9yBxKSr4CDZYc1o5IReAaQz1U+J1EQMxuLortm5W7UEcdQIAgVC8 emeSY4GOcPi0PMsBTtTaWsGaCRP4AnBChd2wNSlezIAQbzW3djrA4t75r1Csea5KaFy4 xj//5xzR2FfId2I71EximTUwyjLovPUDxDqP4FPBTrSuPZ2BfTidUa1hTKyOHnrmAQk7 hPFA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date :subject:cc:to:from:dkim-signature:arc-authentication-results; bh=PxNKzDxNIIwyifEuON75H8y6inO9LOQ6uoG8tObG69Y=; b=apNetiKpKzTihY50EMrmlalDG/CvzsG7mqzyCcor9khhcFFNrDdGjOYo8JnEkB1m3W ZEv81jIePjy+W2Do/y7lpWb5xq4ALkBn3S+tUNRuWOj3eVOSGKWQNoCUPrm9f5XlxQyz WW3xvp/h3J0+mg0WRnMrC6ClYSIXkvg8/eCUnw4FeblczqOpUM0v4EaGCjsfcsiL69sZ Jw3n3NY1tpy/J4Ojcw1J7MiJaRjd3Nwtb/rcbfBvdYCouYHnKi1rItSAoA//WNz2mWDX uTxmXl1TedY1EK9fQ4FD2zQJQ+r+Pf1FIWwpnavXAC7+ThDlgtaDfxozstDKhA9J2N/a V8cQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=fwxMV96U; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o3-v6si32219345pls.64.2018.05.29.17.08.56; Tue, 29 May 2018 17:09:10 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=fwxMV96U; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S968397AbeE3AGY (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 29 May 2018 20:06:24 -0400 Received: from mail-pl0-f66.google.com ([209.85.160.66]:37709 "EHLO mail-pl0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S935846AbeE3AFS (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 May 2018 20:05:18 -0400 Received: by mail-pl0-f66.google.com with SMTP id w19-v6so9905255plq.4 for ; Tue, 29 May 2018 17:05:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references; bh=PxNKzDxNIIwyifEuON75H8y6inO9LOQ6uoG8tObG69Y=; b=fwxMV96UFOTAoNQm/em6xhoHY8ZvoCRp6Bt56N/QDcFk83Xliflr948/JBRdrZNsxM sYabuPkekjcsum9aokOX57hQ5lmtDuZz1RTxfKatETGRBnkefalu+2ASaxLg6UvMtQcc HU1qmnPwkipo5ZwJMeFgT0WzWniXh0HfSAIbzbHOfrIPSxDQL1aGlnK6gjuKgG8fErrK HMTgoNFRd3HMmBcXx+CwmchxYyUCKw7bWog4+Oag+jR8Rk1E7+6ZBq9OlQM/ZG3r+/07 EKumwZk/zf8+kwVsHA6fa4Ucaf4Zf/wTGTY5NlsAOJQISmkmJOwY3xUg6MvRjcWNAL+C RGAA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references; bh=PxNKzDxNIIwyifEuON75H8y6inO9LOQ6uoG8tObG69Y=; b=R23+diQgnPh/g/Da3fqDtU4YEzHiZyzQM3ROdQzcwPnJvPRxQwNDl1DNxKREl+o08/ WYjYUVwFBhi4nj406lTzbLs+HTAorp1BVAJc7JLacy8Zjcr43rycfuQpv2qr0qlz1mwp NmAuiaTK13YrZBifpI+UoUTMfJyPKRczDP5QeOLVfBqr6urYFfp4ksyJ0YyOsDm2NvOp 56Em7ioebCnovDpQrNyJmJt7Y7dzwdR94Llwc8Tmq3bPEuTpZnRp/puptc5KQ9M6v2y9 6OBO4Sb1paM2eWEQ3Kff3b3+aCi2dMXxYONEnfAlam/ftxCTVgDmw4djMhqjEcvhdvjc z6oA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPweTD9tffOR2OHBT5OTlRLmXIqWbYJnTadi+IXByPjqNQsImN1lf ROZ7BfRbMHwFsr+CG/wLllDQUvyVL6Q= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:be0b:: with SMTP id r11-v6mr527798pls.182.1527638717253; Tue, 29 May 2018 17:05:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from joelaf.mtv.corp.google.com ([2620:0:1000:1600:3122:ea9c:d178:eb]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w12-v6sm86979211pfi.158.2018.05.29.17.05.16 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 29 May 2018 17:05:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Joel Fernandes X-Google-Original-From: Joel Fernandes To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: kernel-team@android.com, "Joel Fernandes (Google)" , Boqun Feng , Byungchul Park , Erick Reyes , Ingo Molnar , Julia Cartwright , linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Masami Hiramatsu , Mathieu Desnoyers , Namhyung Kim , Paul McKenney , Peter Zijlstra , Shuah Khan , Steven Rostedt , Thomas Glexiner , Todd Kjos , Tom Zanussi Subject: [PATCH v8 5/8] tracepoint: Make rcuidle tracepoint callers use SRCU Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 17:04:57 -0700 Message-Id: <20180530000500.257225-6-joel@joelfernandes.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.0.921.gf22659ad46-goog In-Reply-To: <20180530000500.257225-1-joel@joelfernandes.org> References: <20180530000500.257225-1-joel@joelfernandes.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" In recent tests with IRQ on/off tracepoints, a large performance overhead ~10% is noticed when running hackbench. This is root caused to calls to rcu_irq_enter_irqson and rcu_irq_exit_irqson from the tracepoint code. Following a long discussion on the list [1] about this, we concluded that srcu is a better alternative for use during rcu idle. Although it does involve extra barriers, its lighter than the sched-rcu version which has to do additional RCU calls to notify RCU idle about entry into RCU sections. In this patch, we change the underlying implementation of the trace_*_rcuidle API to use SRCU. This has shown to improve performance alot for the high frequency irq enable/disable tracepoints. Test: Tested idle and preempt/irq tracepoints. Here are some performance numbers: With a run of the following 30 times on a single core x86 Qemu instance with 1GB memory: hackbench -g 4 -f 2 -l 3000 Completion times in seconds. CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y. No patches (without this series) Mean: 3.048 Median: 3.025 Std Dev: 0.064 With Lockdep using irq tracepoints with RCU implementation: Mean: 3.451 (-11.66 %) Median: 3.447 (-12.22%) Std Dev: 0.049 With Lockdep using irq tracepoints with SRCU implementation (this series): Mean: 3.020 (I would consider the improvement against the "without this series" case as just noise). Median: 3.013 Std Dev: 0.033 [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10344297/ Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) --- include/linux/tracepoint.h | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- kernel/tracepoint.c | 15 +++++++++++- 2 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/tracepoint.h b/include/linux/tracepoint.h index c94f466d57ef..880794207921 100644 --- a/include/linux/tracepoint.h +++ b/include/linux/tracepoint.h @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ */ #include +#include #include #include #include @@ -33,6 +34,8 @@ struct trace_eval_map { #define TRACEPOINT_DEFAULT_PRIO 10 +extern struct srcu_struct tracepoint_srcu; + extern int tracepoint_probe_register(struct tracepoint *tp, void *probe, void *data); extern int @@ -75,10 +78,15 @@ int unregister_tracepoint_module_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb) * probe unregistration and the end of module exit to make sure there is no * caller executing a probe when it is freed. */ +#ifdef CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS static inline void tracepoint_synchronize_unregister(void) { + synchronize_srcu(&tracepoint_srcu); synchronize_sched(); } +#else +static inline void tracepoint_synchronize_unregister(void) { } +#endif #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS extern int syscall_regfunc(void); @@ -129,18 +137,38 @@ extern void syscall_unregfunc(void); * as "(void *, void)". The DECLARE_TRACE_NOARGS() will pass in just * "void *data", where as the DECLARE_TRACE() will pass in "void *data, proto". */ -#define __DO_TRACE(tp, proto, args, cond, rcucheck) \ +#define __DO_TRACE(tp, proto, args, cond, rcuidle) \ do { \ struct tracepoint_func *it_func_ptr; \ void *it_func; \ void *__data; \ + int __maybe_unused idx = 0; \ \ if (!(cond)) \ return; \ - if (rcucheck) \ - rcu_irq_enter_irqson(); \ - rcu_read_lock_sched_notrace(); \ - it_func_ptr = rcu_dereference_sched((tp)->funcs); \ + \ + /* \ + * For rcuidle callers, use srcu since sched-rcu \ + * doesn't work from the idle path. \ + */ \ + if (rcuidle) { \ + if (in_nmi()) { \ + WARN_ON_ONCE(1); \ + return; /* no srcu from nmi */ \ + } \ + \ + idx = srcu_read_lock_notrace(&tracepoint_srcu); \ + it_func_ptr = \ + srcu_dereference_notrace((tp)->funcs, \ + &tracepoint_srcu); \ + /* To keep it consistent with !rcuidle path */ \ + preempt_disable_notrace(); \ + } else { \ + rcu_read_lock_sched_notrace(); \ + it_func_ptr = \ + rcu_dereference_sched((tp)->funcs); \ + } \ + \ if (it_func_ptr) { \ do { \ it_func = (it_func_ptr)->func; \ @@ -148,9 +176,13 @@ extern void syscall_unregfunc(void); ((void(*)(proto))(it_func))(args); \ } while ((++it_func_ptr)->func); \ } \ - rcu_read_unlock_sched_notrace(); \ - if (rcucheck) \ - rcu_irq_exit_irqson(); \ + \ + if (rcuidle) { \ + preempt_enable_notrace(); \ + srcu_read_unlock_notrace(&tracepoint_srcu, idx);\ + } else { \ + rcu_read_unlock_sched_notrace(); \ + } \ } while (0) #ifndef MODULE diff --git a/kernel/tracepoint.c b/kernel/tracepoint.c index 1e37da2e0c25..54157792f5ab 100644 --- a/kernel/tracepoint.c +++ b/kernel/tracepoint.c @@ -31,6 +31,9 @@ extern struct tracepoint * const __start___tracepoints_ptrs[]; extern struct tracepoint * const __stop___tracepoints_ptrs[]; +DEFINE_SRCU(tracepoint_srcu); +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tracepoint_srcu); + /* Set to 1 to enable tracepoint debug output */ static const int tracepoint_debug; @@ -67,16 +70,26 @@ static inline void *allocate_probes(int count) return p == NULL ? NULL : p->probes; } -static void rcu_free_old_probes(struct rcu_head *head) +static void srcu_free_old_probes(struct rcu_head *head) { kfree(container_of(head, struct tp_probes, rcu)); } +static void rcu_free_old_probes(struct rcu_head *head) +{ + call_srcu(&tracepoint_srcu, head, srcu_free_old_probes); +} + static inline void release_probes(struct tracepoint_func *old) { if (old) { struct tp_probes *tp_probes = container_of(old, struct tp_probes, probes[0]); + /* + * Tracepoint probes are protected by both sched RCU and SRCU, + * by calling the SRCU callback in the sched RCU callback we + * cover both cases. So lets chain the SRCU and RCU callbacks. + */ call_rcu_sched(&tp_probes->rcu, rcu_free_old_probes); } } -- 2.17.0.921.gf22659ad46-goog